Skip to content

Fix: error with slice when using descript_scheduler#27

Merged
qaco merged 1 commit intoxtc-tools:mainfrom
yadej:dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

Fix: error with slice when using descript_scheduler#27
qaco merged 1 commit intoxtc-tools:mainfrom
yadej:dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug

Conversation

@yadej
Copy link
Contributor

@yadej yadej commented Jan 27, 2026

Add a minimal failing example for descript_scheduler

Discussion of the error is in that issue #26

@guillon guillon added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 28, 2026
@guillon guillon requested a review from qaco January 28, 2026 09:26
@qaco
Copy link
Contributor

qaco commented Jan 28, 2026

Cool ! Do you want to dig into the bug (probably in descript.py) and fix it in the same PR ? It could be a good exercise to discover XTC deeper. If you prefer, I can do it.

@yadej
Copy link
Contributor Author

yadej commented Jan 28, 2026

I want to try to fix it

@yadej yadej force-pushed the dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug branch from ebd6146 to 98b2aff Compare January 29, 2026 15:52
@yadej yadej changed the title Add test file for error with slice when using descript_scheduler Fix: error with slice when using descript_scheduler Jan 29, 2026
@yadej yadej force-pushed the dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug branch from 98b2aff to 3ab1ee6 Compare February 3, 2026 12:36
@yadej yadej requested a review from qaco February 3, 2026 12:51
@yadej yadej force-pushed the dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug branch from 0120f52 to 97e5311 Compare February 20, 2026 10:28
@yadej yadej requested a review from qaco February 20, 2026 10:38
@qaco
Copy link
Contributor

qaco commented Feb 25, 2026

Sorry for the delay. It is great work. This new round of comments focuses on separation of concerns.

Copy link
Contributor

@qaco qaco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job!

@guillon
Copy link
Member

guillon commented Mar 2, 2026

@qaco is this review ready to merge or does it depend upon PR #50, or vice-versa?

@qaco
Copy link
Contributor

qaco commented Mar 3, 2026

@qaco is this review ready to merge or does it depend upon PR #50, or vice-versa?

Imho, ready to merge !

@guillon
Copy link
Member

guillon commented Mar 3, 2026

@qaco is this review ready to merge or does it depend upon PR #50, or vice-versa?

Imho, ready to merge !

Ok @qaco, please merge it if ready.
Thanks!

@qaco
Copy link
Contributor

qaco commented Mar 4, 2026

@yadej could you please squash your commits ? Once it's done, I merge the branch !

descript_scheduler
- Add test to descript_scheduler with slice
@yadej yadej force-pushed the dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug branch from 5b98628 to 4c39966 Compare March 4, 2026 08:36
@yadej
Copy link
Contributor Author

yadej commented Mar 4, 2026

The commit has been squashed

@qaco qaco merged commit 4361580 into xtc-tools:main Mar 4, 2026
3 checks passed
@yadej yadej deleted the dev/rcesista/spec_schedule_bug branch March 4, 2026 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants