Merge pull request #1 from clauderiks/project-documentation Add documentation index page (#2) # Summary Closes #<issue number> - [] I have read the [Contributing](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and the strict [No-AI Policy](../AI_POLICY.md) guides. ## How Did You Test this Change? ## Images/Videos <!-- if relevant, please include any relevant images that show off how your feature is working --> <!-- devin-review-badge-begin --> --- <a href="https://app.devin.ai/review/clauderiks/ide/pull/2" target="_blank"> <picture> <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://static.devin.ai/assets/gh-open-in-devin-review-dark.svg?v=1"> <img src="https://static.devin.ai/assets/gh-open-in-devin-review-light.svg?v=1" alt="Open in Devin Review"> </picture> </a> <!-- devin-review-badge-end -->

[zskbot]

Summary

Closes #

• [] I have read the Contributing and the strict No-AI Policy guides.

How Did You Test this Change?

Images/Videos

---

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fb9a4a6f-2b49-4015-923e-1bff40100674

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

No Changes in PR

Qodo reviewed your PR and found no changes in the code

[devin-ai-integration]

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

⚠️ 1 issue in files not directly in the diff

⚠️ Editor config validation broken by pointing to a non-existent schema site (.gh-dash.yml:1)

The config file's schema reference is changed ($schema=https://clriks-dash.dev/schema.json at .gh-dash.yml:1) from the official gh-dash schema URL to a different domain, so editors can no longer fetch the schema to validate or autocomplete the config.

Impact: People editing this config in an IDE lose schema validation and autocompletion, and may see errors that the schema cannot be loaded.

Schema URL points away from the official gh-dash schema host

The original line referenced https://gh-dash.dev/schema.json, which is the canonical schema published for gh-dash configs. Changing it to https://clriks-dash.dev/schema.json means the yaml-language-server directive resolves to a domain that does not host the gh-dash schema (and likely does not exist), breaking validation/autocomplete for this config. The rest of the config still targets dlvhdr/gh-dash, confirming this is still a gh-dash config and the original schema URL was correct.