05.CONCEPT EVALUVATION AND CONCEPT ARCHITECTURE

WEIGHTS TO OBJECTS

design NO	Objective	Score Allocated	Justification for score
01	power consumption	00	power supply is same to most of the design
	Ease of use	7	As the design is simple, compare to the datum design
	portability	12	Design has not heavy weight therefore easy to carry
	maintenance	-8	due to small framework maintenance is difficult
	Cost	5	due to simple framework

03	power consumption	00	power supply is same to most of the design
	Ease of use	14	As the design is automatic it becomes much easy to use
	portability	12	The machine is designed in such a way that it is portable
	maintenance	8	as most of the material is raw maintenance is less
	Cost	5	due to simple framework

04	power consumption	00	power supply is same to most of the design
	Ease of use	14	The design is easy compare to datum
	portability	6	Design is smaller in size compare to datum
	maintenance	16	It is easy to maintane due to stable design
	Cost	5	Has it has less complicated special parts to the design

05	power consumption	00	power supply is same to most of the design
	Ease of use	-7	due to complicated design
	portability	6	due to small in size compare to datum
	maintenance	8	Easy to maintane due to small size
	Cost	-5	Due to complex design it requires more parts compare to datum

Design Objective	Weight	Design 01	Design 02	Design 03	Design 04	Design 05
power consumption	5	00	Datum	00	00	00
Ease of use	7	+	Datum	++	++	-
portability	6	++	Datum	++	+	+
maintenance	8	-	Datum	+	++	+
cost	5	+	Datum	+	+	-
Score(+)		24		39	41	14
Score(-)		-8		00	00	-12
Total		16		39	41	2

Organization Structure Chart Infographic Graph

morphological chart