Skip to content

Explicitly match on-the-fly HTLCs after a restart - #3357

Merged
t-bast merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
on-the-fly-payment-hash-dup-restart
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

Explicitly match on-the-fly HTLCs after a restart#3357
t-bast merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
on-the-fly-payment-hash-dup-restart

Conversation

@t-bast

@t-bast t-bast commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When we restart our node, we look at HTLCs that have been received but not relayed yet: they must be failed back, otherwise we would let them in the incoming channel until their timeout is reached, which would force our peer to force-close.

There is an exception for HTLCs that are paying for an on-the-fly funded channel: we will explicitly retry relaying those HTLCs, even after a restart, because that's how we get paid for the funding fees. We were only matching them by payment_hash, which wasn't precise enough: an attacker could initiate an on-the-fly channel and then send unrelated HTLCs that use the same payment_hash, just to mess up with us and get some of our channels force-closed.

We already have the detailed information about on-the-fly HTLCs in our DB, so we now use that to match HTLCs on the corresponding channel_id and htlc_id, which guarantees uniqueness.

This was reported by Loupe (https://github.com/project-loupe).

When we restart our node, we look at HTLCs that have been received but
not relayed yet: they must be failed back, otherwise we would let them
in the incoming channel until their timeout is reached, which would
force our peer to force-close.

There is an exception for HTLCs that are paying for an on-the-fly funded
channel: we will explicitly retry relaying those HTLCs, even after a
restart, because that's how we get paid for the funding fees. We were
only matching them by `payment_hash`, which wasn't precise enough: an
attacker could initiate an on-the-fly channel and then send unrelated
HTLCs that use the same `payment_hash`, just to mess up with us and get
some of our channels force-closed.

We already have the detailed information about on-the-fly HTLCs in our
DB, so we now use that to match HTLCs on the corresponding `channel_id`
and `htlc_id`, which guarantees uniqueness.
@t-bast
t-bast requested review from pm47 and sstone August 14, 2026 14:34

@pm47 pm47 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. We could probably type the pair (case class HtlcCoordinates(...) ?)

@t-bast

t-bast commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

LGTM. We could probably type the pair (case class HtlcCoordinates(...) ?)

I hesitated but it was hard to find a good name, and it required touching more files, so I deferred it for now.

@t-bast
t-bast merged commit aa321d6 into master Aug 19, 2026
1 check passed
@t-bast
t-bast deleted the on-the-fly-payment-hash-dup-restart branch August 19, 2026 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants