Turn meaningful open-source contributions into verifiable career proof.
Browser demo · Launch hub · Run the real app · Engineering showcase · Recruiter brief · Safety · Contribute
ContributorOps is an open-source contribution intelligence platform for developers who want to do meaningful OSS work and turn that work into evidence that maintainers and hiring teams can understand.
The core loop is:
Discover → Prepare → Validate → Authorize → Prove
- Discover role-relevant contribution opportunities.
- Prepare scoped change plans, tests, maintainer context, and PR narrative.
- Validate scope, quality, repository policy, duplicates, and submission readiness.
- Authorize maintainer-facing writes through explicit, bounded authority paths.
- Prove completed work through portfolio evidence, resume bullets, and interview stories.
ContributorOps is intentionally not a mass-commenting bot, mass-PR engine, or contribution-gaming system. Maintainer trust is an architecture constraint.
The fastest evaluation path is the browser demo. It requires no signup, no GitHub token, and no repository access.
The demo uses explicitly fictional examples and walks through:
- issue discovery and role-fit scoring
- focused file/test planning
- deterministic quality checks
- interactive versus standing authorization boundaries
- recruiter-readable proof-of-work output
Want the real product instead of the walkthrough?
The Codespaces/local default remains demo-safe: no GitHub token is required and external contribution execution is disabled unless the operator explicitly configures it.
ContributorOps makes the product story inspectable. The architecture, trust boundaries, quality gates, launch rules, and adoption signals are public rather than hidden behind marketing claims.
| Evidence | What it demonstrates |
|---|---|
| Browser Demo | immediate no-signup product evaluation with clearly fictional scenarios |
| Launch Hub | audience-specific evaluation paths for developers, recruiters, and maintainers |
docs/architecture.md |
system surfaces, data flow, CI, deployment, and production evolution |
docs/security-model.md |
interactive action-scoped approval and standing exact-patch authorization boundaries |
docs/adr/ |
durable reasoning behind high-impact architecture choices |
docs/safety-policy.md |
anti-spam rules, repository-policy checks, exact-patch constraints, and rate limits |
docs/quality-gates.md |
deterministic route/metadata checks, Lighthouse budgets, TypeScript/build gates, and limits |
| CI workflow | API/Web/Site builds, trust tests, dependency audits, secret scanning, and site-quality enforcement |
| CodeQL workflow | JavaScript/TypeScript static security analysis |
| Engineering Showcase | how the implementation maps to engineering evidence |
| Recruiter Brief | a two-minute path from product story to source-level proof |
| Adoption Dashboard | live public GitHub signals without invented customer or user claims |
docs/phase-8-launch-execution.md |
launch packets, channel rules, 60-second demo, measurement, and anti-gaming policy |
A generated plan is never authority by itself.
ContributorOps supports two intentionally separate paths for maintainer-facing execution.
Interactive contribution runs follow:
prepare → inspect exact payload → approve exact action → execute → retain audit event
New runs receive separate approval capabilities for:
- comment
- fork branch
- draft PR
A capability for one action cannot authorize another. Legacy generic run tokens fail closed for new writes.
The operator can separately enable a repository-owned exact-patch queue for bounded unattended execution.
A queued patch must already contain the concrete files, exact replacements, commit metadata, PR copy, and test evidence. Before execution ContributorOps re-checks:
- open/non-archived repository and issue state
- detected repository policy, including AI-contribution prohibitions
- existing PRs referencing the issue
- same-repository/day duplication
- global daily PR cap
- safe paths and bounded file/replacement scope
- exact single-match replacement against current source
Ambiguity or source drift fails closed. Successful standing submissions remain draft pull requests and include automation disclosure.
Read docs/security-model.md and docs/safety-policy.md.
flowchart LR
User[Developer] --> Site[apps/site\nPublic site + browser demo]
User --> Web[apps/web\nProduct UI]
Web --> API[apps/api\nExpress orchestration]
API --> Data[data\nLocal MVP state]
API --> GH[GitHub / Octokit]
Actions[GitHub Actions] --> Quality[CI + quality + security gates]
Actions --> Radar[Hourly OSS radar]
Radar --> Workspace[Managed contributor workspace]
PatchQueue[Repository-owned exact patch queue] --> Exact[Exact-patch validation]
Exact --> GH
API --> Interactive[Action-scoped interactive approval]
Interactive --> GH
The project originally established human-approved interactive writes in ADR-0001. The current security model documents how that interactive path coexists with the separately authorized exact-patch queue.
contributorOps/
├─ .devcontainer/ # one-click Codespaces environment
├─ apps/
│ ├─ api/ # discovery, scoring, planning, GitHub safety + execution paths
│ ├─ web/ # interactive product application
│ └─ site/ # public product, demo, launch, recruiter, adoption, quality, safety
├─ data/ # local MVP state + standing patch queue inputs/results
├─ docs/
│ ├─ adr/ # architecture decision records
│ └─ ... # architecture, safety, quality, adoption, launch, distribution
├─ scripts/ # deterministic site-quality and Lighthouse harnesses
├─ .github/ # CI, CodeQL, dependency review, Pages, radar, patch-queue workflows
├─ lighthouserc.json
├─ CHANGELOG.md
├─ CITATION.cff
├─ CONTRIBUTORS.md
└─ README.md
- issue discovery across external repositories
- role-aware scoring and filtering
- daily/hourly contribution radar
- stack-oriented prioritization
- scoped contribution plans
- likely file and testing suggestions
- maintainer-question drafting
- branch, commit, and PR draft generation
- managed contributor forks/workspaces
- bounded executable exact-patch plans
- PR quality scoring
- deterministic pre-submit checks
- action-scoped interactive approvals
- exact-patch standing authorization
- repository-policy and duplicate checks
- per-repository and global daily limits
- draft-only standing submissions
- auditable approval/run state
- runtime high/critical npm audit merge gate
- full dependency audit reporting
- CodeQL static analysis
- Dependabot update policy
- optional Dependency Review hard gate when GitHub Dependency Graph is enabled
- CycloneDX SBOM generation
- route/metadata integrity validation
- Lighthouse quality budgets
- API/Web/Site TypeScript and build checks
- contribution portfolio tracking
- public contribution pages
- GitHub resume export
- LinkedIn draft generation
- interview STAR story generation
- recruiter-facing summaries
- browser-only no-signup demo
- local/Codespaces real-app evaluation
- public Launch Hub
- live GitHub adoption dashboard
- optional privacy-first analytics, disabled by default
- audience-specific Share Hub
- structured workflow-feedback intake
- contributor-retention playbook
- channel-specific public launch execution guide
- Node.js 20+
- npm 10+
git clone https://github.com/AnkitParekh007/contributorOps.git
cd contributorOps
npm cinpm run devWithout a GitHub token, the product can use its demo discovery path; authenticated GitHub actions remain unavailable.
npm run site:devnpm run test:api
npm run typecheck
npm run build:all
npm run site:quality
npm run site:lighthouse
npm run security:audit:runtimeSee docs/environment-setup.md and docs/local-development.md.
| Area | Status |
|---|---|
| Public product + documentation site | ✅ Live |
| Browser-only no-signup walkthrough | ✅ Implemented |
| Local / Codespaces real-app path | ✅ Implemented |
| Engineering showcase + recruiter brief | ✅ Implemented |
| Public Launch Hub | ✅ Implemented |
| Audience-specific Share Hub | ✅ Implemented |
| Public GitHub adoption dashboard | ✅ Implemented |
| Public Quality Gates surface | ✅ Implemented |
| Route-level metadata + site-quality gate | ✅ Implemented |
| Lighthouse quality budgets | ✅ Implemented |
| Interactive action-scoped approval | ✅ Implemented |
| Standing exact-patch authorization | ✅ Implemented |
| Managed contributor workspace / forks | ✅ Implemented |
| Runtime dependency-security gate | ✅ Implemented |
| CodeQL + Dependabot | ✅ Implemented |
| Safety/security/architecture documentation | ✅ Implemented |
| Distribution + launch execution playbooks | ✅ Implemented |
| Optional privacy-first site analytics hook | ✅ Implemented, disabled by default |
| GitHub Dependency Review hard gate | 🟡 Workflow ready; Dependency Graph must be enabled in repository settings |
| Real billing/payments | 🟡 Planned |
| Per-user GitHub OAuth | 🟡 Planned |
| Production multi-user database | 🟡 Planned |
| Hosted multi-user SaaS operations | 🟡 Planned |
ContributorOps is a working open-source product and engineering architecture showcase, not a claim that a hosted production SaaS is already operating.
The fastest contribution path:
- open the public Contribute page
- browse
good first issueorhelp wanted - read
CONTRIBUTING.md - read the Safety Policy before changing GitHub automation
- run the relevant tests, type checks, builds, and quality gates
- open a focused PR explaining user impact and safety implications
Contributor recognition is described in CONTRIBUTORS.md, and repeat-contributor practices are in docs/contributor-retention.md.
Tried the workflow but do not have a code change yet? Use the Workflow feedback issue template to report one concrete point of friction or improvement.
- Launch Hub — shortest evaluation path by audience
- Adoption Dashboard — live public GitHub signals
docs/phase-8-launch-execution.md— current launch packets and execution rulesdocs/adoption-scorecard.md— GitHub traffic + adoption measurement modeldocs/distribution-playbook.md— audience, conversion, and anti-spam rulesdocs/share-kit.md— canonical copy and technical article angles- Share Hub — audience-specific share links
The measurement system deliberately separates repository engagement from customer/user claims and keeps optional site analytics disabled unless explicitly configured.
ContributorOps prioritizes:
- quality over contribution volume
- professional evidence over vanity activity
- explicit authorization over opaque automation
- maintainer trust over growth mechanics
- fail-closed exactness over unattended guessing
- explainable engineering work over empty GitHub metrics
- audience-specific distribution over mass promotion
- measurable learning over invented traction
- enforced quality gates over unverifiable engineering claims
BSD 3-Clause. See LICENSE.
Try the browser demo. Inspect the source. Challenge the safety model. Contribute if you can make it better.