Skip to content

Conversation

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
mediawiki/mediawiki-codesniffer (source) require major ^38.0 -> ^39.0

Release Notes

wikimedia/mediawiki-tools-codesniffer

v39.0.0

Compare Source

New sniffs
  • Create PHPUnitAssertEmpty sniff to warn against using assertEmpty (DannyS712)
Changed sniffs
  • AssertionOrderSniff: Also re-order actual value named $expected* (DannyS712)
  • ClassLevelLicense: Skip whole rest of file (Lucas Werkmeister)
  • FunctionAnnotationsSniff: Add some Psalm tags (Gergő Tisza)
  • FunctionCommentSniff: Skip attributes when checking for doc block (DannyS712)
  • PropertyDocumentationSniff: Handle visibility on its own line (DannyS712)
  • SpecificAssertionsSniff: Add assertEmpty() and assertNotEmpty() (DannyS712)
  • SpecificAssertionsSniff: Add assertIsArray() and assertIsNotArray() (DannyS712)
Documentation, dependencies and build changes
  • HISTORY: Fix 'visiblity' typo (Klein Muçi)
  • docs: Remove or replace usages of "sanity" (Reedy)
  • tests: Move AlphabeticArraySort tests into own directory (Lucas Werkmeister)
  • build: Lock down composer/semver version again now everything's upgraded (James D. Forrester)
  • build: Updating composer dependencies (libraryupgrader)
  • build: Update squizlabs/php_codesniffer to 3.6.2 (Alexander Vorwerk)
  • build: Updating mediawiki/mediawiki-phan-config to 0.11.1 (libraryupgrader)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: "before 3am on the first day of the month" in timezone UTC.

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@matticbot matticbot added [Status] Needs Review This PR is ready for review. [Type] Janitorial labels May 13, 2022
@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

⚠ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: undefined
Command failed: /tmp/monorepo/.github/files/renovate-post-upgrade-run.sh renovate/mediawiki-mediawiki-codesniffer-39.x
Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Caution: This PR has changes that must be merged to WordPress.com
Hello matticbot! These changes need to be synced to WordPress.com - If you 're an a11n, please commandeer and confirm D80775-code works as expected before merging this PR. Once this PR is merged, please commit the changes to WP.com. Thank you!
This revision will be updated with each commit to this PR

@anomiex anomiex enabled auto-merge (squash) May 13, 2022 18:58
@anomiex anomiex merged commit 07202ca into master May 13, 2022
@anomiex anomiex deleted the renovate/mediawiki-mediawiki-codesniffer-39.x branch May 13, 2022 18:59
@anomiex
Copy link
Contributor

anomiex commented May 13, 2022

r245639-wpcom

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the jetpack/11.0 milestone May 13, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Great news! One last step: head over to your WordPress.com diff, D80775-code, and deploy it.
Once you've done so, come back to this PR and add a comment with your changeset ID.

Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the [Status] Needs Review This PR is ready for review. label May 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants