build(deps): bump actions/setup-python from 6.0.0 to 7.0.0 - #600
Conversation
954d1a0 to
1825838
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
182583872ae2d255ef0465226218b60496110820. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- OSV-Scanner PR/osv-scan / osv-scan: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/30107865441/job/89529646606)
- osv-scan / osv-scan check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/30107865441/job/89529646606)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed. Findings1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
Failed checks:
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
|
1825838 to
d95680f
Compare
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 5 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough세 GitHub Actions 워크플로에서 Python 설정에 사용하는 ChangesPython 액션 업데이트
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
26a2e30ff9d8d6dca3c8d3c7cbdf60b28dbbb28c. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Strix Security Scan/strix: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/30674601512/job/91299124574)
- Strix Security Scan/strix: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/.github/actions/runs/30674601512/job/91299124574)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
|
@dependabot rebase |
|
Looks like this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot. That means Dependabot can't rebase it - sorry! If you're happy for Dependabot to recreate it from scratch, overwriting any edits, you can request |
seonghobae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The diff only advances the pinned setup-python action in workflows that use the stable python-version input. None uses the removed pip-install input, and interpreter versions and subsequent installation commands remain unchanged.
26a2e30 to
e641f62
Compare
The requested current-head Strix failure has been resolved: workflow run 30674601512 was re-run and its strix job completed successfully on head 26a2e30. All eight current-head security workflows are also successful, and an exact-head approval is present. Dismissing this no-longer-applicable failure-only review without bypassing any required check.
|
@dependabot rebase |
|
Looks like this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot. That means Dependabot can't rebase it - sorry! If you're happy for Dependabot to recreate it from scratch, overwriting any edits, you can request |
|
@dependabot recreate |
3d9f705 to
f2dd634
Compare
|
@dependabot rebase |
Bumps [actions/setup-python](https://github.com/actions/setup-python) from 6.0.0 to 7.0.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/setup-python/releases) - [Commits](actions/setup-python@v6...5fda3b9) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/setup-python dependency-version: 7.0.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
f2dd634 to
ff4158a
Compare
Bumps actions/setup-python from 6.0.0 to 7.0.0.
Release notes
Sourced from actions/setup-python's releases.
... (truncated)
Commits
5fda3b9Pin SHA commits and update docs with latest versions (#1338)4ab7e95Merge pull request #1337 from actions/philip-gai/bump-actions-cache-6-2-00f3a009Remove the pip-install input (#1336)f8cf429Migrate to ESM and upgrade dependencies (#1330)54baeeaValidate and retry manifest fetch to prevent silent failures (#1332)c709277Annotation code fix (#1335)6849080remove EOL Python versions and Bumps numpy text fixture (#1333)0903b46Bump certifi from 2020.6.20 to 2024.7.4 in /tests/data (#1328)