Skip to content

Metric Name Pricing UI Changes to EUMs - #38731

Open
ouracheal wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
ouracheal/mnp-ui-improvements
Open

Metric Name Pricing UI Changes to EUMs#38731
ouracheal wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
ouracheal/mnp-ui-improvements

Conversation

@ouracheal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

explain how customers can use MNP EUMs

  • WIP, please do not merge yet - thank you!

@ouracheal
ouracheal requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2026 13:18
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Guide Content impacting a guide label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@evazorro evazorro added the WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) label Aug 4, 2026
@evazorro

evazorro commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @ouracheal, I added the "work in progress" label because you mentioned this is a WIP. That label will keep the PR out of the Documentation team's review queue. When you're ready for us to take a look, just remove the label. Thank you for updating the docs!

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Images Images are added/removed with this PR label Aug 4, 2026
@jhgilbert

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[Automated message] This PR has merge conflicts created by the docs repo reorg project. Because this PR is marked as a work in progress, no attempt was made to auto-resolve the conflicts. When your PR is finished, you can queue your PR for an auto-fix by removing the WORK IN PROGRESS label and the astro-reorg-skip label. Your PR will be processed in the next batch of attempted auto-fixes.

This is an automated comment, but if you have a question, you can mention me in this PR (external contributors) or reach out in #docs-repo-reorg-support on Slack (internal contributors).

@jhgilbert jhgilbert added astro-reorg-skip Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg astro-reorg-processed Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg labels Aug 6, 2026
@ouracheal ouracheal removed the WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) label Aug 6, 2026
@ouracheal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @ouracheal, I added the "work in progress" label because you mentioned this is a WIP. That label will keep the PR out of the Documentation team's review queue. When you're ready for us to take a look, just remove the label. Thank you for updating the docs!

@evazorro Thanks so much! This PR is ready for review :)

@evazorro

evazorro commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@evazorro Thanks so much! This PR is ready for review :)

@ouracheal Great! As it happens, today we're reorganizing the repo, so your PR now has some merge conflicts because of the new directory structure. You can fix those conflicts yourself, or follow the instructions in this comment and our automation will open a new PR to fix the conflicts for you (this may take a little while). After that, my team will do a review as normal.

@jeff-morgan-dd jeff-morgan-dd self-assigned this Aug 7, 2026

@jeff-morgan-dd jeff-morgan-dd left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you! As Eva mentioned, there's a merge conflict as a result of the repo migration yesterday. Easiest first step is just to remove the astro-reorg-skip label from the PR and let the autofix try and resolve. Please reach out if you have any issues - thanks!

@ouracheal ouracheal removed the astro-reorg-processed Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg label Aug 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

astro-reorg-skip Needs manual conflict resolution after replatforming reorg Guide Content impacting a guide Images Images are added/removed with this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants