-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
Bug/cleanup output data #138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Add scheduler singleton to handle creating pools an closing pools. - Remove Pool references and replace scheduler - Update tests and benchmarks
add tally methods to tally in batches
…eature/multi-processing
also, fix a bug where the tally did not include the decryption shares, and where a few of the CP proofs were not using the crypto_extended_base_hash in their challenge inputs
|
This pull request introduces 5 alerts when merging d363a51 into 463bf0c - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
|
This pull request introduces 5 alerts when merging 9d6f6e2 into 463bf0c - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
|
This pull request introduces 3 alerts when merging 28df5ff into 463bf0c - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
…ug/cleanup-output-data
keithrfung
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm.
Issue
Link your PR to an issue
Fixes #137
Description
Use friendly variable names for proofs. add comments to them to make it easy to find in the spec. Add the decryption shares to the tally output. Fix a bug with the CP proofs were a couple of them were not using the extended base hash code as an input to the challenge generators. Added challenge values explicitly in a few places to ease computational comparisons
depends on: #134
Testing
Checklist
🚨Please review the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
💚Thank you!