Properly support fluids - #3003
Merged
Merged
Conversation
octylFractal
reviewed
Aug 8, 2026
octylFractal
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2026
octylFractal
left a comment
octylFractal
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving as-is, we'll look at cleaning it up later alongside BlockState.
Member
Author
|
Follow-up issue for cleanup: #3006 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds proper FluidState/FluidType/FluidCategory support, migrating our historic partial registries to be fully featured as well as adding FluidState as a derived BlockState property.
This allows us in the future to support features such as #3001, as the way to differentiate those blocks is to use fluid states.
This PR purely exposes the fluid system within our API, it does not add any features using those fluids at this point.