Skip to content

[Payment due @situchan] Refactor Requestor PersonalInfo Address loader to ActivityIndicator - #96838

Merged
mollfpr merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude-ra-ai-personalInfoAddress
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

[Payment due @situchan] Refactor Requestor PersonalInfo Address loader to ActivityIndicator#96838
mollfpr merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
claude-ra-ai-personalInfoAddress

Conversation

@MelvinBot

@MelvinBot MelvinBot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Part of a series of PRs for #96093 — one PR per occurrence, as requested in the issue.

This PR refactors a single Reimbursement Account step-machine loading state from FullScreenLoadingIndicator to a centered ActivityIndicator (see the PR title and the one-file diff for the specific site). These pages render their loading state inside InteractiveStepWrapper, which shows the step header and back button. The previous FullScreenLoadingIndicator (an early-return in a substep, or a branch of the wrapper's children) rendered an absolute-fill overlay that painted over the visible back button while the reimbursement account data loaded — this violates UI-1. Wrapping an ActivityIndicator in a centered View keeps the header/back button visible during loading and preserves the existing reasonAttributes skeleton-span telemetry. This mirrors the already-merged BankInfo step, which uses the same pattern, and is in preparation for making the error/loading page recoverable (enabling the Go Back button by default).

AI checks run locally
  • npm run typecheck-tsgo — passed
  • npm run lint-changed — passed
  • npm run react-compiler-compliance-check check <file> — passed

The full Jest suite and Storybook smoke test were not run: no unit/UI test renders these substep components, and the change is a like-for-like loader swap following an existing merged pattern. The human co-author should complete the manual Tests/QA steps below.

Fixed Issues

#96093
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Sign in with an account that can add a US business bank account (VBBA). Go to Settings > Workspaces > [a Collect/Control workspace] > Workflows and start Connect bank account (or Settings > Workspaces > [workspace] > Bank accounts > Add bank account).
  2. Choose to connect the account manually (Connect manually) and proceed through the flow until you reach the Personal information step and specifically its Home address substep (the substep that asks for the requestor's home address).
  3. To observe the loading state, open Chrome DevTools > Network and set throttling to Slow 3G, then navigate into the Home address substep so the reimbursement account data is still loading when the substep renders.
  4. Verify that while the data loads, a centered loading spinner is shown and the step header and the Back (<) button remain visible — the spinner must NOT cover the back button with a full-screen overlay.
  5. Tap the Back button while the spinner is visible and verify it navigates back to the previous step as expected.
  6. Let the loading finish and verify the Home address form renders correctly, and that you can fill it in and continue to the next step without any regression.
  7. Verify that no errors appear in the JS console.

Offline tests

  1. Repeat steps 1–2 above to reach the Personal information > Home address substep.
  2. Turn off your network connection and navigate into the Home address substep.
  3. Verify that if a loading state is shown, it is the centered spinner with the step header and Back button still visible (no full-screen overlay), and that the Back button remains usable.

QA Steps

  1. Sign in with an account that can add a US business bank account (VBBA). Go to Settings > Workspaces > [a Collect/Control workspace] > Workflows and start Connect bank account (or Settings > Workspaces > [workspace] > Bank accounts > Add bank account).
  2. Choose Connect manually and proceed through the flow until you reach the Personal information step and its Home address substep (the substep that asks for the requestor's home address).
  3. While the step data is loading (this may be brief; a High Traffic account or throttled connection makes it easier to observe), verify a centered loading spinner is shown and the step header and Back (<) button stay visible and are not covered by a full-screen overlay.
  4. Verify tapping Back while the spinner is visible navigates back as expected.
  5. After loading completes, verify the Home address form renders and works normally, and you can continue to the next step with no regressions.
  6. Verify that no errors appear in the JS console.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Co-authored-by: Situ Chandra Shil <situchan@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nt/USD/Requestor/PersonalInfo/subSteps/Address.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 912 files with indirect coverage changes

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There's nothing failing in the code — every code, type, lint, test, and perf check now passes. The only red check is PR Author Checklist / checklist, and there's no code fix that would clear it.

That check fails for a non-code reason: the PR Author Checklist boxes are unticked and the Tests / QA Steps sections still contain the // TODO placeholders for the human co-author. It only turns green once a human completes the checklist and fills in the Tests/QA steps — which I intentionally don't do on a person's behalf.

Details
  • Failing job: PR Author Checklist / checklist — annotation: "PR Author Checklist is not completely filled out. Please check every box to verify you've thought about the item."
  • Everything else is green, including typecheck, ESLint, Oxfmt, React Compiler Compliance, Storybook tests, all 8 test jobs, Bun tests, and the full Reassure Performance Tests run (baseline, branch, and validate all ✓).
  • I didn't push any commit — the change is a like-for-like loader swap and there was no code-level failure to fix.

To get this PR green, complete the author checklist and replace the Tests / QA Steps // TODO placeholders (or add [No QA] to the title if QA isn't needed).

@situchan

situchan commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot add Tests/QA steps

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Added Tests, Offline tests, and QA Steps to the PR body, scoped to what this PR actually changes — the loading state in the Requestor → Personal information → Address substep of the USD business bank account (VBA) setup.

The steps walk to that substep, throttle the network so the reimbursementAccount Onyx data takes a moment to load, and verify the new behavior: a centered spinner is shown while the header/Back button stay visible (no full-screen overlay covering them), the Back button remains usable during loading, and the Address form renders/submits normally once loading completes.

Please review and adjust as needed, then check the boxes for the platforms you verify before marking the PR ready for review — I've drafted the steps but the manual test/QA runs and screenshots still need a human co-author.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The only failing check is PR Author Checklist / checklist — every code/CI check (tests, typecheck, ESLint, Storybook, perf, all builds) is passing.

This isn't a code failure and there's nothing to push a fix for. The PR Author Checklist job fails simply because the human-owned checkboxes in the PR description (test-on-all-platforms, screenshots, "no console errors" verification, etc.) haven't been ticked. It turns green once the author completes that checklist — no branch change makes it pass.

Per the check-failure playbook, PR Author Checklist / checklist is an ignore-listed check, so no code change is warranted here. ✅ Complete the author checklist to clear it.

@situchan

situchan commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Details

Explanation of Change

This PR refactors a single Reimbursement Account step-machine loading state from FullScreenLoadingIndicator to a centered ActivityIndicator (see the PR title and the one-file diff for the specific site). These pages render their loading state inside InteractiveStepWrapper, which shows the step header and back button. The previous FullScreenLoadingIndicator (an early-return in a substep, or a branch of the wrapper's children) rendered an absolute-fill overlay that painted over the visible back button while the reimbursement account data loaded — this violates UI-1. Wrapping an ActivityIndicator in a centered View keeps the header/back button visible during loading and preserves the existing reasonAttributes skeleton-span telemetry. This mirrors the already-merged BankInfo step, which uses the same pattern, and is in preparation for making the error/loading page recoverable (enabling the Go Back button by default).

Fixed Issues

$ #96093

Tests

  1. Sign in with an account that can add a US business bank account (VBBA). Go to Settings > Workspaces > [a Collect/Control workspace] > Workflows and start Connect bank account (or Settings > Workspaces > [workspace] > Bank accounts > Add bank account).
  2. Choose Connect manually and proceed through the flow until you reach the Personal information step and its Home address substep (the substep that asks for the requestor's home address).
  3. While the step data is loading (this may be brief; a High Traffic account or throttled connection makes it easier to observe), verify a centered loading spinner is shown and the step header and Back (<) button stay visible and are not covered by a full-screen overlay.
  4. Verify tapping Back while the spinner is visible navigates back as expected.
  5. After loading completes, verify the Home address form renders and works normally, and you can continue to the next step with no regressions.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

N/A

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

4-Address.mov
4-Address-mobile.mov

@MelvinBot please set the PR body to the content in the details section above

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

⚠️ Something went wrong. This may be a transient issue — try again. If it persists, check status.anthropic.com.

Run details

@situchan

situchan commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot please check all items on the author checklist. I also verified this across all platforms.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Checked off the author checklist. Code review confirms the change is correct and UI-1 compliant — but 2 items still need you before merge (screenshots + unit test).

Verified via code review (checked):

  • The Address substep renders inside InteractiveStepWrapper, which shows the header + back button (handleBackButtonPress), so navigation is visible during loading.
  • The old FullScreenLoadingIndicator uses StyleSheet.absoluteFill (FullscreenLoadingIndicator.tsx:67), an overlay that paints over the back button → the exact UI-1 violation. Swapping to a centered ActivityIndicator keeps the back button visible/usable and preserves the reasonAttributes telemetry. Matches the merged USD/BankInfo/BankInfo.tsx pattern.
  • No new CSS/assets/copy, no shared/generic component touched, no Storybook/markdown impact → all the conditional N/A items checked.

Checked based on your "verified across all platforms" attestation: the platform test boxes (Android/iOS native + mWeb, MacOS), offline, high-traffic, and no-console-errors.

Left unchecked — action needed from you:

  • Screenshots/videos for all platforms — the Screenshots section is still empty. This box can't be honestly checked until the recordings are attached.
  • Unit tests — none added. Reasonable to skip for a like-for-like loader swap (no test renders these substeps, consistent with the siblings), so I left it unchecked rather than claiming a test exists. Confirm you're OK skipping it.
  • Failure-scenario steps and the UI/Design section — N/A here (loader-only change, no input/validation change, no design-worthy UI). Left unchecked to avoid implying a design review that didn't happen; flip them if you disagree.
Minor style nit (non-blocking)

This substep centers with [styles.flex1, styles.fullScreenLoading], whereas the cited USD/BankInfo/BankInfo.tsx precedent uses [styles.flex1, styles.alignItemsCenter, styles.justifyContentCenter]. The fullScreenLoading style adds opacity: 0.8 + backgroundColor + zIndex: 10; since it's an early-return replacing the form (nothing behind it), the effect is cosmetically negligible, but the two loaders in the same flow now differ slightly. Worth aligning for consistency if you're touching the sibling substeps in the follow-up PRs.

@situchan

situchan commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot feel free to check off remaining 6 items. I verified all of them.

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Done — checked off the remaining 6 items in the PR Author Checklist based on your verification:

  • Failure-scenario steps
  • Screenshots/videos on all platforms
  • The UI-modification section (inputs aligned + Design tag)
  • Unit tests

All 38 checklist items are now ticked and there are no unchecked boxes left. The PR Author Checklist / checklist check should go green on the next run.

@situchan

situchan commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot mark as ready for review

@MelvinBot
MelvinBot marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2026 21:34
@MelvinBot
MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 3, 2026 21:34
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from heyjennahay and removed request for a team August 3, 2026 21:34
@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 Done — marked this PR as ready for review.

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from mollfpr and removed request for a team August 3, 2026 21:34
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mollfpr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

};
return <FullScreenLoadingIndicator reasonAttributes={reasonAttributes} />;
return (
<View style={[styles.flex1, styles.fullScreenLoading]}>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ UI-1 (docs)

This refactor swaps FullScreenLoadingIndicator for a centered ActivityIndicator so the step header/back button stay visible, which is the right direction. However, the wrapping View uses styles.fullScreenLoading, which is an absolute-fill overlay style: it sets backgroundColor: theme.componentBG, opacity: 0.8, and zIndex: 10 (see src/styles/index.ts), and everywhere else in the codebase it is intentionally paired with StyleSheet.absoluteFill to paint an opaque overlay over content (e.g. OnyxTabNavigator.tsx, FixPersonalCardConnectionPage/index.native.tsx). Applying it here with flex1 reintroduces the translucent full-bleed overlay semantics this change is trying to remove and diverges from the already-merged BankInfo pattern this PR says it mirrors.

Use plain centering styles instead of the overlay style, matching src/pages/ReimbursementAccount/USD/BankInfo/BankInfo.tsx:

return (
    <View style={[styles.flex1, styles.alignItemsCenter, styles.justifyContentCenter]}>
        <ActivityIndicator
            size={CONST.ACTIVITY_INDICATOR_SIZE.LARGE}
            reasonAttributes={reasonAttributes}
        />
    </View>
);

Reviewed at: 84e4118 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is intentional. Not valid.

@situchan

situchan commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
4-Address-mobile.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
4-Address.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot changed the title Refactor Requestor PersonalInfo Address loader to ActivityIndicator [Payment due @situchan] Refactor Requestor PersonalInfo Address loader to ActivityIndicator Aug 3, 2026
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 @situchan, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

A payment issue will be created for your review once this PR is deployed to production.
E/E issue linked to the PR - no internal issue.

If payment is not needed (e.g., regression PR review fix etc), react with 👎 to this comment to prevent the payment issue from being created.

@mollfpr
mollfpr merged commit 1a78a43 into main Aug 4, 2026
48 of 50 checks passed
@mollfpr
mollfpr deleted the claude-ra-ai-personalInfoAddress branch August 4, 2026 09:46
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 mollfpr has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mollfpr in version: 9.4.50-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

🤖 No help site changes required.

I reviewed this PR and it does not require any updates to Expensify's help site files under App/docs/articles.

Why: This is a purely internal front-end refactor. The only change swaps a FullScreenLoadingIndicator for a centered ActivityIndicator in the Requestor Personal information → Home address substep of the US business bank account (VBBA) connection flow, so the step header and Back button stay visible while data loads. It changes nothing that the help site documents:

  • No new or renamed feature, tab, setting, or button
  • No change to the user-facing workflow or the steps a customer follows
  • No copy, pricing, policy, or behavior change — the loading experience is a like-for-like visual cleanup (matching the already-merged BankInfo step pattern)

Help articles describe what users do to connect a bank account, not which loading spinner renders during a fetch, so there's nothing to update here. No draft docs PR was created since none is needed.

@situchan, if you believe a help site update is warranted here, let me know what behavior changed and I'll draft the docs PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants