You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Project guidance had drifted behind the implementation: README described an
unusable scaffold, architecture treated implemented features as plans, and
the roadmap omitted completed Milestone 5 slices. The first documentation
refresh also overstated snapshot-bound authorization. A fresh contributor
needs concise entrypoints that route to source and decision authority, an
accurate workflow, and evidence of the current continuation state.
Outcome and acceptance criteria
README, roadmap, architecture, domain model, and integrity guide distinguish
current implementation from remaining work through Milestone 5 slice 2.
AGENTS.md remains concise and preserves the repository contract, while a
task index maps work to source, ADRs, formats, and relevant tests.
CONTRIBUTING.md owns build/verification and contribution detail; tool
entrypoints stay thin and consistent.
Document local versus deployed preview behavior without credentials.
Audit current repository/CI readiness, run web/Rust/browser checks, and
record material gaps with exact evidence and follow-up ownership.
Consolidate duplicated browser process lifecycle into a shared fixture,
prove startup/refusal/cleanup behavior, and typecheck browser code.
Primary PR: #55, also addressing #57 (browser fixture ownership). Separate
repair found by the audit: #56 (doctor changes persisted journal mode).
Existing work remains in #27, #34, #47, #49, #51, #52, and #54; #44 owns
Milestone 5.
Problem
Project guidance had drifted behind the implementation: README described an
unusable scaffold, architecture treated implemented features as plans, and
the roadmap omitted completed Milestone 5 slices. The first documentation
refresh also overstated snapshot-bound authorization. A fresh contributor
needs concise entrypoints that route to source and decision authority, an
accurate workflow, and evidence of the current continuation state.
Outcome and acceptance criteria
current implementation from remaining work through Milestone 5 slice 2.
task index maps work to source, ADRs, formats, and relevant tests.
entrypoints stay thin and consistent.
record material gaps with exact evidence and follow-up ownership.
without claiming unimplemented service guarantees.
prove startup/refusal/cleanup behavior, and typecheck browser code.
Primary PR: #55, also addressing #57 (browser fixture ownership). Separate
repair found by the audit: #56 (doctor changes persisted journal mode).
Existing work remains in #27, #34, #47, #49, #51, #52, and #54; #44 owns
Milestone 5.