Skip to content

test: prove root reconciliation contention - #262

Merged
Joncallim merged 39 commits into
codex/pr198-root-negative-assertion-inputsfrom
codex/pr198-root-contention-proof
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

test: prove root reconciliation contention#262
Joncallim merged 39 commits into
codex/pr198-root-negative-assertion-inputsfrom
codex/pr198-root-contention-proof

Conversation

@Joncallim

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds mandatory two-session dedicated-login contention proof. The winner enters the real claim/context boundary and pauses on an external barrier; a loser receives bounded PostgreSQL lock-timeout denial; winner completes exactly one lineage before the existing CLI resumes.

Validation: focused test 17/17, ESLint, TypeScript, shell syntax, diff check. Live PostgreSQL execution is mandatory CI.

Joncallim added 30 commits July 28, 2026 02:43
test: run root privilege mutations in upgrade proof
test: use root owner for grant option mutation
test: bind root grantor to mutation session
test: close root reconciler grant options
test: close root reconciler column privileges
fix: align root write context schema metadata
test: fix ordinary app trigger proof inputs
test: prove root reconciler actor boundaries
fix: close root reconciler routine allowlist
…ability

test: isolate root reconciliation binding rejections
fix: support PostgreSQL 16 root privilege proof
test: prove root reconciler allowlist mutations
test: close root reconciler privilege allowlist
test: make root authority additions admissible
test: align root authority recovery fixture
test: bind root authority assertion inputs
test: distinguish root proof psql statuses
test: diagnose root proof psql failures
test: keep negative reconciliation inputs transactional
@Joncallim
Joncallim marked this pull request as ready for review July 27, 2026 21:12
@Joncallim
Joncallim merged commit 4386910 into codex/pr198-root-negative-assertion-inputs Jul 27, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
@Joncallim
Joncallim deleted the codex/pr198-root-contention-proof branch August 2, 2026 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant