Skip to content

Conversation

dehann
Copy link
Member

@dehann dehann commented Jul 26, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 26, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #895 (b44bd69) into master (78c37a3) will decrease coverage by 21.42%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #895       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.42%   0.00%   -21.43%     
==========================================
  Files          50      49        -1     
  Lines        3010    2987       -23     
==========================================
- Hits          645       0      -645     
- Misses       2365    2987      +622     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/zmq/ZmqCaesar.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
src/3rdParty/_PCL/_PCL.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
src/services/_FastTransform3D.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...rdParty/_PCL/services/ConsolidateRigidTransform.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
src/images/ScatterAlignPose2.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-96.27%) ⬇️
src/plotting/ScatterAlignPlotting.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-92.31%) ⬇️
src/3rdParty/_PCL/services/ICP_Simple.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-89.80%) ⬇️
src/3rdParty/_PCL/services/PointCloud.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-80.96%) ⬇️
src/images/Pose2AprilTag4Corners.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-72.10%) ⬇️
src/zmq/services/session.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-69.31%) ⬇️
... and 7 more

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

```

The return type for `getSample` is unrestricted, and will be passed to the residual function "as-is".
The return type for `getSample` is unrestricted, and will be passed to the residual function "as-is", but must return values representing a tangent vector for `<:AbstractRelative`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this might be the other way around, getSample on <:AbstractPrior must return a Point on manifold, on Relative, it is unrestricted, but we recommend a tangent vector TpM.
I'll try and find the issue where this was discussed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tangent on relative factors -- that's what the PR already has, no? "a tangent vector for <:AbstractRelative"

@dehann dehann merged commit 47a74da into master Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants