Skip to content

slt: Allow multireplica in github-10045-10046-10052.slt#34991

Merged
mgree merged 2 commits intoMaterializeInc:mainfrom
mgree:allow-multireplica-in-10045etc
Feb 13, 2026
Merged

slt: Allow multireplica in github-10045-10046-10052.slt#34991
mgree merged 2 commits intoMaterializeInc:mainfrom
mgree:allow-multireplica-in-10045etc

Conversation

@mgree
Copy link
Contributor

@mgree mgree commented Feb 12, 2026

This PR combines two bugfixes to give the best fix, allowing for multireplica tests.

Motivation

#34966 fixes an SLT test from #34905 that broke in nightly when run with multiple replicas.

The fix there is better than the fix I put in #34958, which forces the test to only run in single replica mode.

Description

Takes the singlereplica_ out of the name, so we'll actually run multi-replica tests.

Verification

Running appropriate 4-replica slt tests from nightly.

@mgree mgree requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2026 16:34
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Pre-merge checklist

  • The PR title is descriptive and will make sense in the git log.
  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).

Copy link
Contributor

@def- def- left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test change is fine, I have less of an idea about src/transform!

@mgree mgree force-pushed the allow-multireplica-in-10045etc branch from ecfa549 to c63c1e7 Compare February 12, 2026 18:35
@mgree
Copy link
Contributor Author

mgree commented Feb 12, 2026

Oy! I don't know how that change even snuck in, it's supposed to be on a different local branch. Delighted it passed nightly (since #34858 reverted it), but it shouldn't have been in here. I'll re-run the 4-replica SLTs to be double sure that the change is good.

@mgree mgree merged commit 36ac5b4 into MaterializeInc:main Feb 13, 2026
16 checks passed
patrickwwbutler pushed a commit to patrickwwbutler/materialize that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2026
…nc#34991)

This PR combines two bugfixes to give the best fix, allowing for
multireplica tests.

### Motivation

MaterializeInc#34966 fixes an SLT
test from MaterializeInc#34905 that
broke in nightly when run with multiple replicas.

The fix there is better than the fix I put in
MaterializeInc#34958, which forces
the test to only run in single replica mode.

### Description

Takes the `singlereplica_` out of the name, so we'll actually run
multi-replica tests.

### Verification

Running appropriate 4-replica slt tests from nightly.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants