thtk: init at 12-unstable-2025-05-06

[theobori]

Fix #359985

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[steeleduncan]

@ofborg eval

[steeleduncan]

I'm not sure if I have permissions to trigger another ofborg eval, but the derivation seems to build fine on my local machine, so i'm not sure what is causing the failures

[theobori]

I'm not sure if I have permissions to trigger another ofborg eval, but the derivation seems to build fine on my local machine, so i'm not sure what is causing the failures

Someone has missspelled a keyword c4f05d1

[steeleduncan]

@theobori Ah, ok. If you are able to change something and force push you should see the tests going green. I think even just an interactive rebase that changes the commit time would be enough. Though thinking about it you might need to rebase to a version of master without that issue

[phanirithvij]

@ofborg eval