Skip to content

Comments

highctidh: init at 1.0.2025051200#394284

Open
mightyiam wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
mightyiam:highctidh
Open

highctidh: init at 1.0.2025051200#394284
mightyiam wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
mightyiam:highctidh

Conversation

@mightyiam
Copy link

@mightyiam mightyiam commented Mar 29, 2025

https://codeberg.org/vula/highctidh

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Mar 29, 2025
@mightyiam
Copy link
Author

Since I'm using a single file for multiple named variants, I don't see how the pkgs/by-name pattern can be used.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5336

@fricklerhandwerk
Copy link
Contributor

Just like you do right now, except //pkgs/by-name/hi/highctidh

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a configuration parameter rather than a dependency, it would be somewhat idiomatic to give it a default value. This was never a firm rule (at least AFAIK), but it's already an observable pattern

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use the (finalAttrs: pattern for easier overriding.

@mightyiam mightyiam marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 11:50
@mightyiam mightyiam changed the title highctidh: init at 1.0.2024092800 highctidh: init at 1.0.2025051200 May 12, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 12.first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Oct 2, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Nov 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants