nu_scripts: 0-unstable-2025-04-14 -> 0-unstable-2025-04-23

[jaredmontoya]

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[illdefined]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 401058

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• nu_scripts

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• nu_scripts

[illdefined]

The licence should be set more specifically to lib.licenses.mit instead of lib.licenses.free.

The package outputs look good, although I would like to note that the repository’s README and LICENSE files are included in the script directory. They could be moved to share/doc for example, for cleanliness, but this is not important in my opinion.

The package update itself is fine, but I’d recommend to drop rec or use finalAttrs, set the source repo name literally, and correct meta.license in additional commits.

[illdefined]

Thanks for the update. It does unfortunately omit correction of the licence information.

The repository contains a standard MIT licence while the meta.license attribute is specified as lib.licenses.free. This should be changed to lib.licenses.mit.

[jaredmontoya]

fixed