quarkdown: init at 1.6.1

[Pandapip1]

I really had no idea the Java tooling in nixpkgs was this bad.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Nixpkgs 25.11 Release Notes (or backporting 25.05 Nixpkgs Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
• NixOS 25.11 Release Notes (or backporting 25.05 NixOS Release notes)
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other contributing documentation in corresponding paths.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5686

[MisileLab]

1.8.0 released: iamgio/quarkdown@v1.6.1...v1.8.0

[Pandapip1]

I'll stick with 1.6.1 (which I know works) and update to 1.8.0 in a follow-up PR.

[Pandapip1]

Both nits applied. @yzhou216 in the future, if you see stuff that isn't caught by either nixfmt or nixpkgs-vet, in addition to the review, I'd recommend checking for open issues in their corresponding repos, and if there isn't one, open one yourself. I've gone ahead and opened NixOS/nixpkgs-vet#173.

[Pandapip1]

Looks like darwin doesn't work. I'll just mark it as unsupported

[yzhou216]

Looks like darwin doesn't work. I'll just mark it as unsupported

I'm not sure why, tho. In theory, it should just work. The error log is not being helpful…

[Pandapip1]

That looks suspiciously like it's trying to do network stuff. I'll modify my nixpkgs-review-gha to try building the BSDs to see if this is a darwin or a non-linux thing.

EDIT: Never mind, github actions doesn't have a BSD image. Oh well. I'll be conservative and mark it linux-only for now.

[yzhou216]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 422160

Logs: https://github.com/yzhou216/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/16686414510

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• quarkdown

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• quarkdown

[yzhou216]

Approved automatically following the successful run of nixpkgs-review.

[PandapipBot]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 422160
Commit: 698d30d0abaddf38359ac512c7fb0f2e964fe052 (subsequent changes)
Merge: e61aaa3f6129c0f82bc1867b834c68f17bf6dcac

Logs: https://github.com/PandapipBot/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/17782129679

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• quarkdown

---

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:

• quarkdown

---

x86_64-darwin

✅ No rebuilds

---

aarch64-darwin

✅ No rebuilds

[Pandapip1]

Okay neat that works now

[Pandapip1]

Bump!

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-already-reviewed/2617/2609

[Pandapip1]

Bump, would still like this. I'm just waiting for a committer to review/merge!