Skip to content

merge prtest#57

Merged
luyajun0205 merged 165 commits intoprtestfrom
master
Mar 19, 2018
Merged

merge prtest#57
luyajun0205 merged 165 commits intoprtestfrom
master

Conversation

@luyajun0205
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Describe your changes here.

Fixes #Issue_Number (if available)

svick and others added 30 commits March 8, 2018 10:47
The introductory sentence could be read as implying
definitions that contradict the body of the article.
* Fix invalid Windows file system paths

* Add escape characters
Changed "Visual basic" to "Visual Basic" for the description of the Get Visual Basic link.
* Fixed broken links in interop docs

* Updated additional links

* Removed 'en-us' from URLs
Visual Basic Fundamentals for Absolute Beginners link was directing to a list of courses, not really related to VB.  I've updated the link directly to the course.  I did check to see if the course was in other languages before putting in the en-US link - looks like it's available only in English.
Change "new ValidationResult(true, null)" to "ValidationResult.ValidResult", since it looks a little cleaner and the property was explicitly designed for that use.
* article and code moved

* interim checkin

Switching tasks.

* checkin to run test build

I want to see if I can use local functions in C# interactive.

* finish samples and new draft

Ready for my first review.

* fix build errors

* proofread

* update per feedback.

* respond to feedback.

* additional feedback.

* respond to feedback.
Change "New ValidationResult(True, Nothing)" to "ValidationResult.ValidResult", since it looks a little cleaner and the property was explicitly designed for that use.
Without this, the rest of the file renders incorrectly.
*  Removed an excessive "and" 
*  Removed some text that didn't seem overly clear.
daniel-deutsch-zocdoc and others added 29 commits March 15, 2018 15:20
* Fix markdown link

* feedback
* fixed typo

* fix typo
Just noticed on docs.microsoft.com that these code blocks don't have syntax highlighting, which does not adhere to the style guide
* Add UWP as platform that supports .NET Standard

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2017/10/10/announcing-uwp-support-for-net-standard-2-0/

* Add platforms; remove versions; add link

Instead of listing the same platforms that are listed on https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/net-standard#net-implementation-support and having to maintain both lists as new versions are released, just mention the platforms here and link to the existing table with versions.

Closes dotnet#3814

* feedback
* < and > wrong

< and > were not in code

* Updated xref

Updated xref to correct signature

* removing tickmarks and overloads

* some other minor fixes
* Operator new doesn't create structs on the stack

* Small improvements to operator new

* Structs can contain resources too

* Mention garbage collector

* Clarified when value types are destroyed
@luyajun0205 luyajun0205 merged commit 0108084 into prtest Mar 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.