-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
cycleway value should fall back to cycleway:both if available
#7314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cycleway value should fall back to cycleway:both if available
DennisOSRM
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking clean and simple.
|
Hey @TheMarex, good to see you. 👋🏼 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR implements a fallback mechanism for the cycleway tag to use cycleway:both when cycleway is not available, addressing issue #6179.
Key Changes:
- Modified the
cyclewaytag retrieval logic to fall back tocycleway:bothifcyclewayis not present - Added comprehensive test scenarios to verify the fallback behavior works correctly for different road types
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| profiles/bicycle.lua | Implements fallback logic to use cycleway:both when cycleway tag is absent |
| features/bicycle/cycleway.feature | Adds test scenarios verifying the fallback behavior on motorway and primary roads |
| CHANGELOG.md | Documents the fix in the unreleased changes section |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
👋 Have a bit of time for a few days, figured I'll help with the backlog. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
ee4dabf to
f7d7338
Compare
Issue
Fixes issue #6179. Thanks @Nate-Wessel!
Tasklist
Requirements / Relations
Rebased version of #6180