Removed unused itk_python_add_test#90
Merged
Merged
Conversation
SimonRit
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2026
SimonRit
left a comment
SimonRit
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. Regarding documentation, I'm in favor of being in line with RTK's approach and referring to RTK's coding doc in PCT's doc. We should review RTK's and check what's applicable and what's not.
This was referenced Jul 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following RTKConsortium/RTK#964. Do I also reproduce RTKConsortium/RTK@3f942e9 by creating a code contribution page in the documentation (in a separate PR)? I'm not sure it's useful given that PCT does not receive a lot of outside contributions anyway.