fix: use relative path for srvx static files

[flofehrenbacher]

Running srvx --prod -s dist/client dist/server/index.js didn't work because srvx@0.11.22 always responded with

srvx 0.11.21 · node 24.15.0 · prod
◆ Server handler: ./dist/server/index.js
◇ Static files:   (create public/ dir)

When changing to srvx --prod -s ../client dist/server/index.js the output is

srvx 0.11.21 · node 24.15.0 · prod
◆ Server handler: ./dist/server/index.js
◇ Static files:   ./dist/client/

and everything works.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated Rsbuild deployment instructions to serve the client files from the correct directory when using srvx.
  • Retained the server entry configuration for dist/server/index.js.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2d8251f0-514f-43e3-bffb-f84211af39ca

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3e24c3 and 9242b64.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/start/framework/react/guide/hosting.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Rsbuild deployment example updates its srvx start command to serve the client directory from ../client, while retaining dist/server/index.js as the server entry.

Changes

Rsbuild hosting

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update srvx asset path docs/start/framework/react/guide/hosting.md	The start command now serves static assets from ../client instead of dist/client and continues targeting dist/server/index.js.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: switching srvx static files to a relative path.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}