Clean namespace

[MehdiK]

based on #61

This is not to be merged but rather to be used to discuss different options. What do you think?

cc @mwhelan

[mwhelan]

I like the promotion of Reporters from within Processors. The removal of Core is a bit more interesting. It takes some adjusting to get used to them in the root, but I think it makes sense. Overall, I think I quite like this approach. Most things seem to be in the namespace that corresponds to their folder location. The only exception is Scanners, but that is a good exception. I like that Scanners are physically grouped in their own folder but have TestStack.BDDfy namespace for optimal discoverability and namespace explosion in consuming code.

[MehdiK]

I am a bit unsure about Core bits too. You think they should be moved back to a Core folder with no namespace? On the other hand, I thought having the core bits out and make them visible on the very first look may make the code more approachable for the new-comer!

Thoughts?

[mwhelan]

I think it's quite an aesthetic thing really. I don't necessarily think
it's more discoverable in the root, but I'm happy either way.

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Mehdi Khalili notifications@github.comwrote:

I am a bit unsure about Core bits too. You think they should be moved back
to a Core folder with no namespace? On the other hand, I thought having the
core bits out and make them visible on the very first look may make the
code more approachable for the new-comer!

Thoughts?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/62#issuecomment-38018551
.