Skip to content

Support for returning multi-dimensional R arrays#263

Merged
eddelbuettel merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
de/ch8255/return_as_array
Jun 22, 2021
Merged

Support for returning multi-dimensional R arrays#263
eddelbuettel merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
de/ch8255/return_as_array

Conversation

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR builds on the correction in PR #260 for the issue raised in #259 and extends support for multidimensional array returns, which is most applicable for dense arrayss with their implicit indices along the individual dimensions. It adds a logical slot to the tiledb_array object, similar to the choices for matrix or data.frame return, ensures at most one of those choices is selected, adds some getters and setters, as well as a conversion function.

@shortcut-integration
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been linked to Clubhouse Story #8255: Support as.array return object.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ihnorton ihnorton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested a bit with 3x3 array from Python, LGTM from my perspective.

@eddelbuettel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks, and yes: it was a well-motivated use case, and with it now in the main branch, and likely a new release soon to deploy TileDB 2.3.1, we can go back to user who filed this in #259.

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel merged commit 2174eeb into master Jun 22, 2021
@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel deleted the de/ch8255/return_as_array branch June 22, 2021 21:06
eddelbuettel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2021
eddelbuettel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2021
* updated configure and downloader scripts for arm64

* standard behavior without override for header detection

* more careful use of optional second argument

* call fetchTileDB.sh with arguments os and machine (ie arch)

* make use of architecture argument

* updated for for 2.3.1, plus filename pattern change

* update NEWS file for #263 and #264
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants