Explicit scheduling requirements for online votes#579
Merged
Conversation
Looking in the process docs, I was unable to find specific wording on our requirement that votes be explicit in the agenda for online meetings. The "In-person meeting consensus" section of consensus.md has the following paragraph: > For in-person meetings, champions are expected to list points for which they will seek consensus in the meeting agenda, and new consensus points can be added in-person as the discussion proceeds. I propose that we add language to the "Online consensus" section disallowing consensus votes that were not on the agenda 24 hours before the meeting (our current practice) and I further propose that we make an exception for general interest votes on pre-proposals. The goal of this exception is to eliminate artificial process delays for moving proposals to phase 1, given that the technical bar for that move is so low.
rossberg
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2020
Ms2ger
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2020
dtig
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2020
Member
Author
|
Merging, as approved by the CG this morning. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Looking in the process docs, I was unable to find specific wording on
our requirement that votes be explicit in the agenda for online
meetings.
The "In-person meeting consensus" section of consensus.md has the
following paragraph:
I propose that we add language to the "Online consensus" section
disallowing consensus votes that were not on the agenda 24 hours
before the meeting (our current practice) and I further propose that
we make an exception for general interest votes on pre-proposals. The
goal of this exception is to eliminate artificial process delays for
moving proposals to phase 1, given that the technical bar for that
move is so low.
If we reach consensus on this change here, I will add an agenda item to
vote on this change at a CG meeting.