-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor t… #1117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Lighthouse scores (desktop)
|
Lighthouse scores (mobile)
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
1 similar comment
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Lighthouse scores (mobile)
|
Lighthouse scores (desktop)
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
2 similar comments
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Lighthouse scores (mobile)
|
Lighthouse scores (desktop)
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
2 similar comments
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Lighthouse scores (desktop)
|
Lighthouse scores (mobile)
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
2 similar comments
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Lighthouse scores (mobile)
|
Lighthouse scores (desktop)
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
2 similar comments
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #1117 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 80.74% 80.74%
Complexity 771 771
=========================================
Files 91 91
Lines 2108 2108
Branches 285 285
=========================================
Hits 1702 1702
Misses 252 252
Partials 154 154 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ | |||
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | |||
| <jcr:root xmlns:sling="http://sling.apache.org/jcr/sling/1.0" xmlns:fd="http://www.adobe.com/aemfd/fd/1.0" xmlns:cq="http://www.day.com/jcr/cq/1.0" xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Examples is deployed today in aemcomponents.dev which should only consists of component collaterals, ideally this collateral should be under content folder inside it (ie) https://github.com/adobe/aem-core-forms-components/tree/master/it/content/src/main/content/jcr_root/content/forms/sites
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
Accessibility Violations Found
|
2 similar comments
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
| jcr:lastModifiedBy="admin" | ||
| jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured" | ||
| sling:resourceType="forms-components-examples/components/form/container" | ||
| clientLibRef="corecomponent.it.ruleeditor,corecomponent.it.customfunction" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the rationale behind having two client libraries? If they serve different purposes, shouldn't we name them accordingly to reflect their use cases? Currently, corecomponent.it.ruleeditor and corecomponent.it.ruleeditor aren't very intuitive in terms of understanding their intended functions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is to test the functionality that form can handle more than one clientlib category and we get a merged list of custom functions on form.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, can we rename the client library category name ? They are not readable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
I am keeping category name as corecomponent.it.customfunction and corecomponent.it.customfunction2
also added a test case to make it clear.
rismehta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check comments
e960234 to
480072e
Compare
Lighthouse scores (desktop)
|
Lighthouse scores (mobile)
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
2 similar comments
Accessibility Violations Found
|
Accessibility Violations Found
|
#1117) * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: updated getParentFormElementId method to check for form fieldType * FORMS-11692: updated af2-runtime and remove authoring tests for rule editor. * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests * FORMS-11692: updated getParentFormElementId method to check for form fieldType * FORMS-11692: updated tests * FORMS-11692: updated tests * FORMS-11692: added test case for merged custom function list from two clientlibs --------- Co-authored-by: Arun Kumar Attri <aattri@adobe.com>
…ests
Description
Related Issue
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: