Skip to content

Conversation

@arunattri26
Copy link
Contributor

…ests

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
  • All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
  • I ran all tests locally and they pass.

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 91 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

1 similar comment
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 88 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 86 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 92 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 92 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.74%. Comparing base (da93d69) to head (480072e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                dev    #1117   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     80.74%   80.74%           
  Complexity      771      771           
=========================================
  Files            91       91           
  Lines          2108     2108           
  Branches        285      285           
=========================================
  Hits           1702     1702           
  Misses          252      252           
  Partials        154      154           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<jcr:root xmlns:sling="http://sling.apache.org/jcr/sling/1.0" xmlns:fd="http://www.adobe.com/aemfd/fd/1.0" xmlns:cq="http://www.day.com/jcr/cq/1.0" xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0"
Copy link
Collaborator

@rismehta rismehta Mar 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Examples is deployed today in aemcomponents.dev which should only consists of component collaterals, ideally this collateral should be under content folder inside it (ie) https://github.com/adobe/aem-core-forms-components/tree/master/it/content/src/main/content/jcr_root/content/forms/sites

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@arunattri26 arunattri26 requested a review from rismehta March 20, 2024 04:29
jcr:lastModifiedBy="admin"
jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"
sling:resourceType="forms-components-examples/components/form/container"
clientLibRef="corecomponent.it.ruleeditor,corecomponent.it.customfunction"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the rationale behind having two client libraries? If they serve different purposes, shouldn't we name them accordingly to reflect their use cases? Currently, corecomponent.it.ruleeditor and corecomponent.it.ruleeditor aren't very intuitive in terms of understanding their intended functions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is to test the functionality that form can handle more than one clientlib category and we get a merged list of custom functions on form.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In that case, can we rename the client library category name ? They are not readable.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@arunattri26 arunattri26 Mar 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.
I am keeping category name as corecomponent.it.customfunction and corecomponent.it.customfunction2
also added a test case to make it clear.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rismehta rismehta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

check comments

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 92 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
focus-order-semantics minor
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@arunattri26 arunattri26 requested a review from rismehta March 21, 2024 08:25
@rismehta rismehta merged commit 0c9da93 into dev Mar 21, 2024
@rismehta rismehta deleted the FORMS-11692-new branch March 21, 2024 09:26
ravise5 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
#1117)

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: updated getParentFormElementId method to check for form fieldType

* FORMS-11692: updated af2-runtime and remove authoring tests for rule editor.

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: upgraded af2-web-runtime version and added rule editor tests

* FORMS-11692: updated getParentFormElementId method to check for form fieldType

* FORMS-11692: updated tests

* FORMS-11692: updated tests

* FORMS-11692: added test case for merged custom function list from two clientlibs

---------

Co-authored-by: Arun Kumar Attri <aattri@adobe.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants