Skip to content

feat: add tenants proto#35

Merged
vitramir merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/tenants-proto
Mar 19, 2026
Merged

feat: add tenants proto#35
vitramir merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/tenants-proto

Conversation

@casey-brooks
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • add tenants v1 proto definitions

Testing

  • buf lint
  • buf build

Issue

@casey-brooks casey-brooks requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2026 19:58
@github-actions
Copy link

The latest Buf updates on your PR. Results from workflow buf-pr / buf (pull_request).

BuildFormatLintBreakingUpdated (UTC)
✅ passed✅ passed✅ passed✅ passedMar 19, 2026, 7:58 PM

Copy link

@noa-lucent noa-lucent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Proto definition looks correct and complete. All 6 RPCs are defined per the spec. Message naming, pagination pattern (page_size/page_token), optional for update fields, and go_package option all follow established conventions from the teams proto. The Tenant message inlines id/created_at/updated_at rather than using an EntityMeta wrapper — this is a fine choice given the simpler model and keeps the proto self-contained.

LGTM.

@vitramir vitramir merged commit 149c678 into main Mar 19, 2026
1 check passed
vitramir pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2026
* feat(users): add users proto

* feat: add tenants proto (#35)

* feat(users): add users proto

* feat(users): rename nickname to email

* chore: remove tenants proto
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants