Skip to content

Add release workflow - #27

Merged
dain merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
user/dain/add-release-workflow
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

Add release workflow#27
dain merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
user/dain/add-release-workflow

Conversation

@dain

@dain dain commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Bytecode lacks the automated publication path used by other Airlift libraries. Add a serialized release process so Maven Central publication, Git tags, and GitHub release metadata are coordinated consistently.

@dain
dain requested a review from electrum July 21, 2026 02:46
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@dain, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b8c25416-b249-4c0a-9ddd-7b8bbccdc207

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 387ff0b and 9bedc34.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a manually triggered GitHub Actions workflow for Maven releases. The workflow validates execution on master, configures Java 25, Maven caching, GPG credentials, and Git identity, then prepares, validates, and publishes artifacts through Maven and njord. It pushes the master branch and tags, then creates a GitHub Release with generated notes.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@electrum electrum left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could use the newer version that uses job concurrency rather than the branch lock.

Bytecode lacks the automated publication path used by other Airlift
libraries. Add a serialized release process so Maven Central publication,
Git tags, and GitHub release metadata are coordinated consistently.
@dain
dain force-pushed the user/dain/add-release-workflow branch from 387ff0b to 9bedc34 Compare July 21, 2026 17:47
@dain
dain merged commit 9ce50d8 into master Jul 21, 2026
2 checks passed
@dain
dain deleted the user/dain/add-release-workflow branch July 21, 2026 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants