Emit GCSListObjectsOperator delimiter deprecation warning after rendering - #70533
Open
yuseok89 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Emit GCSListObjectsOperator delimiter deprecation warning after rendering#70533yuseok89 wants to merge 1 commit into
yuseok89 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
yuseok89
force-pushed
the
feature/70296-gcs-list-objects-warn-after-render
branch
from
July 27, 2026 15:40
257c2b9 to
e97b0a4
Compare
yuseok89
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 28, 2026 05:07
yuseok89
requested review from
amoghrajesh,
ashb,
bugraoz93,
gopidesupavan,
jason810496,
jscheffl,
potiuk and
shahar1
as code owners
July 28, 2026 05:07
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
related: #70296
The delimiter template field was inspected in init, so the deprecation warning fired on the unrendered Jinja value instead of the resolved one.
Move the check to execute() so it reflects the value the task actually runs with.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.