Skip to content

Conversation

@pabloem
Copy link
Member

@pabloem pabloem commented Feb 10, 2023

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.

@pabloem pabloem marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2023 17:59
@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Feb 10, 2023

r: @byronellis

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control

@pabloem
Copy link
Member Author

pabloem commented Feb 10, 2023

r: @manavgarg

@byronellis
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm

@pabloem pabloem merged commit 299be58 into apache:master Feb 13, 2023
@pabloem pabloem deleted the zetasql-errors branch February 13, 2023 22:28
kennknowles added a commit to kennknowles/beam that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2023
The reverted change causes incorrect results in error cases in the ZetaSQL
compliance tests.

This reverts commit 299be58.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants