Skip to content

Conversation

@AlexKbit
Copy link
Contributor

@AlexKbit AlexKbit commented Apr 3, 2019

Hi @kennknowles !
This change contains tests on structuralValue implementation for base coders (with deprecate consistentWithEquals)

Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

Lang SDK Apex Dataflow Flink Gearpump Samza Spark
Go Build Status --- --- --- --- --- ---
Java Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status Build Status
Python Build Status
Build Status
--- Build Status
Build Status
Build Status --- --- ---

Pre-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

--- Java Python Go Website
Non-portable Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Portable --- Build Status --- ---

See .test-infra/jenkins/README for trigger phrase, status and link of all Jenkins jobs.

@AlexKbit
Copy link
Contributor Author

AlexKbit commented Apr 5, 2019

@kennknowles Could you please review this changes?

Copy link
Member

@kennknowles kennknowles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This is very good with one change suggested.

@AlexKbit
Copy link
Contributor Author

AlexKbit commented Apr 8, 2019

@kennknowles I added checks for non-equal members

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 7, 2019

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@beam.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member

lukecwik commented Jun 7, 2019

@kennknowles Whats the status on this?

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 7, 2019
@kennknowles kennknowles self-requested a review June 7, 2019 19:41
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Ah, my mistake. I forgot to actually "request" my own review so it was not showing in my review queue.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

These tests are definitely useful. I want to merge it. I will take a minute and see if I can resolve the conflicts. Since it is caused by my delay, please allow me and I will push back to this branch if I have perms.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Ah, and the conflicts are caused by a prior commit being reverted because of issues with Dataflow pipeline update.

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Indeed, we need to roll forward #8258 for this one.

@AlexKbit
Copy link
Contributor Author

AlexKbit commented Jun 8, 2019

I will can update this PR (solve conflicts).
But Kenn is right, we should merge my previous changes #8071 which was reverted in #8258

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

I don't want to waste you time, @AlexKbit. It seems that a lot of these tests are for methods that were rolled back. So if you want to submit just the tests that apply to existing implementations, that's cool. But maybe you would prefer to wait. The issue with update incompatibility in Dataflow needs to get resolved anyhow.

@AlexKbit
Copy link
Contributor Author

AlexKbit commented Jun 9, 2019

Ok I think I can wait or add patch to ticket in Jira.
@kennknowles Will you close this PR?

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

It is OK with me you can leave this open or close it. Might as well keep the useful code waiting until the right time.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 9, 2019

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 60 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@beam.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Aug 9, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 16, 2019

This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.

@stale stale bot closed this Aug 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants