Skip to content

Conversation

@jt2594838
Copy link
Contributor

@jt2594838 jt2594838 commented Jan 20, 2019

Fundamental classes for supporting deletion.

Copy link
Contributor

@wujysh wujysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps we should not paste private links on Apache repository. It is not friendly for the public open source community.

@wujysh
Copy link
Contributor

wujysh commented Jan 20, 2019

LGTM except the PR title. Can you change to a more clear one?

@jt2594838
Copy link
Contributor Author

I may try, though I am bad at naming.

@jt2594838 jt2594838 changed the title delete development phase 1 fundamental classes for supporting deletion Jan 20, 2019
@Beyyes
Copy link
Member

Beyyes commented Jan 21, 2019

I think it's better to open an issue(include description, implementation, documents, etc) in jira. All pull requests should be associated in this issue.

@jt2594838 jt2594838 changed the title fundamental classes for supporting deletion [IOTDB-5]fundamental classes for supporting deletion Jan 21, 2019
*/
public void close() throws IOException {
synchronized (this) {
writer.close();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you need to call reader.close() here. Otherwise please set reader.close() as a private function

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reader and writer refer to the same object in this implementation, so there is no need to close reader after writer is closed.

@jixuan1989 jixuan1989 closed this Feb 19, 2019
@jt2594838 jt2594838 deleted the delete_dev1 branch February 21, 2019 03:36
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot E 1 Security Hotspot
Code Smell A 18 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

mychaow pushed a commit to mychaow/incubator-iotdb that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2020
mzp0514 pushed a commit to mzp0514/iotdb that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2021
# This is the 1st commit message:

Fix query one sensor in a vector from memtable (apache#3056)

Fix query one sensor in a vector from memtable
# This is the commit message apache#2:

[IOTDB-1310] Enable docker, docker-compose and testcontainer for End to end test (apache#3024)

* enable TestCongtainer for E2E test for (singleNode and cluster)

* remove duplicated operations in integration-test phase

* move spotless:apply to a profile `spotless`, which is enabled by default.

Co-authored-by: xiangdong huang <sainthxd@gmail.com>
# This is the commit message apache#3:

add sink interface

# This is the commit message apache#4:

3 new event sinks

# This is the commit message apache#5:

add ts sink

# This is the commit message apache#6:

add ts sink

# This is the commit message apache#7:

add mqtt sink

# This is the commit message apache#8:

refactor sink module

# This is the commit message apache#9:

init package sink.manager

# This is the commit message apache#10:

rename SinkException

# This is the commit message apache#11:

remove id in config

# This is the commit message apache#12:

fix doc

# This is the commit message apache#13:

add test framework

# This is the commit message apache#14:

add alertmanager sink & test & doc

# This is the commit message apache#15:

beautify the doc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants