KAFKA-20328: [2/N] headers-aware decorator/forwarder test coverage - #22992
Open
muralibasani wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
KAFKA-20328: [2/N] headers-aware decorator/forwarder test coverage#22992muralibasani wants to merge 1 commit into
muralibasani wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
triage
Contributor
Author
|
@aliehsaeedii here is the 2nd PR to cover the unit coverage for the header-aware forwarding adapters and decorators for missing overrides |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ref: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-20328
Second PR of the KAFKA-20328 audit.
Adds unit coverage for the header-aware forwarding/decorator layers so that missing method overrides (ex. backwardFetch, backwardFindSessions) are caught by tests rather than by manual testing.
Format-converting adapters:
Decorators (previously untested):