Skip to content

NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues #311

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
jiridanek merged 2 commits into from
May 7, 2021
Merged

NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues #311

jiridanek merged 2 commits into from
May 7, 2021

Conversation

@jiridanek
Copy link
Contributor

@jiridanek jiridanek commented May 7, 2021

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 7, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #311 (82a894b) into main (08b301a) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #311      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.20%   69.17%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         352      352              
  Lines       69564    69557       -7     
==========================================
- Hits        48144    48114      -30     
- Misses      21420    21443      +23
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
c/src/proactor/epoll.c 84.57% <0.00%> (-1.37%) ⬇️
c/src/core/transport.c 90.22% <0.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
c/tests/threaderciser.c 83.68% <0.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
c/src/core/codec.c 82.49% <0.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 08b301a...82a894b. Read the comment docs.

@jiridanek jiridanek changed the title NO-JIRA fix travis build? NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues May 7, 2021
@jiridanek
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiridanek commented May 7, 2021

@gemmellr @astitcher looks like this worked. Should be merged quickly, before they break something else!

@jiridanek jiridanek marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2021 16:41
@jiridanek jiridanek merged commit 06c7e64 into apache:main May 7, 2021
@jiridanek jiridanek deleted the jd_valgrind branch May 7, 2021 16:45
jiridanek added a commit to jiridanek/qpid-proton that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2022
@jiridanek
Revert "NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues (apa…
965b928 
…che#311)"

The workaround has outlived its usefulness and is now causing build failures.

This reverts commit 06c7e64
jiridanek added a commit to jiridanek/qpid-proton that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2022
@jiridanek
Revert "NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues (apa…
69a6e4b 
…che#311)"

The workaround has outlived its usefulness and is now causing build failures.

This reverts commit 06c7e64
jiridanek added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2022
@jiridanek
Revert "NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues (#311)…
bc364b9 
…" (#372)

The workaround has outlived its usefulness and is now causing build failures.

This reverts commit 06c7e64
jiridanek added a commit to jiridanek/qpid-proton that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2023
@jiridanek
NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues (apache#311)
d47d8e3
jiridanek added a commit to jiridanek/qpid-proton that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2023
@jiridanek
Revert "NO-JIRA Workaround Travis CI package installation issues (apa…
4d95e5e 
…che#311)" (apache#372)

The workaround has outlived its usefulness and is now causing build failures.

This reverts commit 06c7e64
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jiridanek @codecov-commenter