[SPARK-44023][SQL][TESTS] Add System.gc at beforeEach in PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite#41533
[SPARK-44023][SQL][TESTS] Add System.gc at beforeEach in PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite#41533LuciferYang wants to merge 7 commits intoapache:masterfrom
System.gc at beforeEach in PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite#41533Conversation
connector/connect/client/jvm/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/application/ReplE2ESuite.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
scriptSystem.gc to PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite
|
|
||
| class PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite extends PrunePartitionSuiteBase with SharedSparkSession { | ||
|
|
||
| override def beforeEach(): Unit = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's check if this is really useful @HyukjinKwon @zhengruifeng
|
The latest rebase did not actually run GA test, let me trigger it again |
System.gc to PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuiteSystem.gc to PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite
System.gc to PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuiteSystem.gc at beforeEach in PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite
|
it seems what about figuring out the problematic test suites to disable for now? |
|
The running one should be |
hang at |
|
Another frequently killed is
|
|
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41552/files is making another try, add a new test group to the sql module to alleviate the workload of group |
| * The class contains tests for the `ALTER TABLE .. RENAME PARTITION` command | ||
| * to check V2 table catalogs. | ||
| */ | ||
| @Ignore |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Although GA passed, I am not sure we really need ignore this case ...
|
Merged to master. |
Perhaps this is a good idea. |
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for all your efforts about sql - others failures.
Although the master branch still fails after merging this, I believe this PR helps us narrow-down the investigation scope.
I'm also +1 for adding a new test group and splitting sql - others into two groups. Thank you again all.
…TableRenamePartitionSuite` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? #41533 ignore `AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite` try to restore stability of `sql-others` test task, but it seems that it is not the root cause that affects stability, so this pr has removed the previously added `ignore` identifier to restore testing. ### Why are the changes needed? Resume testing of `AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? should monitor ci Closes #41647 from LuciferYang/SPARK-44089. Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
…leSourcePartitionsSuite` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This pr aims to add `System.gc` at `beforeEach` in `PruneFileSourcePartitionsSuite` to avoid `sql-others` GA testing task OOM. ### Why are the changes needed? Make GA testing stable ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, just for test ### How was this patch tested? Should monitor CI Closes apache#41533 from LuciferYang/GA-test. Lead-authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Co-authored-by: YangJie <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
…TableRenamePartitionSuite` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? apache#41533 ignore `AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite` try to restore stability of `sql-others` test task, but it seems that it is not the root cause that affects stability, so this pr has removed the previously added `ignore` identifier to restore testing. ### Why are the changes needed? Resume testing of `AlterTableRenamePartitionSuite` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? should monitor ci Closes apache#41647 from LuciferYang/SPARK-44089. Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: Max Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr aims to add
System.gcatbeforeEachinPruneFileSourcePartitionsSuiteto avoidsql-othersGA testing task OOM.Why are the changes needed?
Make GA testing stable
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, just for test
How was this patch tested?
Should monitor CI