WA: Support JWTs as Access Tokens in the configuration/console - #282
Merged
Conversation
Member
Contributor
Author
|
I think the base branch I started off with was based on #279 . So once that is merged, then the "extra changes" here would automatically go away. If that PR is not merged/accepted, then I can surely rebase on top of the current master branch. The idea of this PR is to allow console to support the "JWT as Access Tokens" configuration option for OIDC RPs, both in the UI and the underlying models/TOs. |
Member
|
I see, thanks. |
Contributor
Author
|
Merged with upstream, extra changes are now gone. I'll wait to see CI confirm changes/tests. |
ilgrosso
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2021
mmoayyed
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 22, 2021 03:24
ilgrosso
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requires #279