parity_profile table parity

[gbkannan89]

This PR add profiles table page parity TPv2 primarily. It includes delete, export & view servers options. I have not included features like create, edit, import, compare, clone profile, view delivery services ans manage parameters as those features come under other tickets.

Which Traffic Control components are affected by this PR?

• Traffic Portal

What is the best way to verify this PR?

• Make sure the unit tests pass withng test

PR submission checklist

• This PR has tests
• This PR has documentation
• This PR has a CHANGELOG.md entry
• This PR DOES NOT FIX A SERIOUS SECURITY VULNERABILITY (see the Apache Software Foundation's security guidelines for details)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7434 (af60510) into master (8eace3b) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 82.60%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #7434      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.05%   61.13%   +0.07%     
  Complexity       98       98              
============================================
  Files           302      303       +1     
  Lines         11535    11581      +46     
  Branches        779      784       +5     
============================================
+ Hits           7043     7080      +37     
- Misses         4146     4154       +8     
- Partials        346      347       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
traffic_portal_v2	64.42% <82.60%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
unit_tests	64.42% <82.60%> (+0.18%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ntal/traffic-portal/src/app/api/profile.service.ts	5.55% <0.00%> (-2.14%)	⬇️
...al/src/app/shared/navigation/navigation.service.ts	55.81% <ø> (ø)
...ffic-portal/src/app/api/testing/profile.service.ts	73.91% <80.00%> (+4.68%)	⬆️
.../profiles/profile-table/profile-table.component.ts	96.77% <96.77%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[shamrickus]

This will need to be rebased as next time the E2E tests will fail due to chrome version mismatch

[shamrickus]

This should also have E2E tests under the nightwatch folder. You can look at the other tables to see how it's done, our E2E tests are lacking right now so it shouldn't be too much effort.

[shamrickus]

LGTM
Code looks good and runs appropriately, any missing features are planned for the profile detail/parameters PRs.

[shamrickus]

nit: I would prefer this to use respCDN.id so that the tests work regardless of what the environment currently looks like; however, CDN 1 is the ALL CDN which is not able to be deleted so this is fine and should always work.