Skip to content

fix(applicationset): correct SCM provider generator filter evaluation - #28811

Open
nitishfy wants to merge 1 commit into
argoproj:masterfrom
nitishfy:scm-provider-filtering
Open

fix(applicationset): correct SCM provider generator filter evaluation#28811
nitishfy wants to merge 1 commit into
argoproj:masterfrom
nitishfy:scm-provider-filtering

Conversation

@nitishfy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes #23881
Closes #22503

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this does not need to be in the release notes.
  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • The title of the PR conforms to the Title of the PR
  • I've included "Closes [ISSUE #]" or "Fixes [ISSUE #]" in the description to automatically close the associated issue.
  • I've updated both the CLI and UI to expose my feature, or I plan to submit a second PR with them.
  • Does this PR require documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have signed off all my commits as required by DCO
  • I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
  • My build is green (troubleshooting builds).
  • My new feature complies with the feature status guidelines.
  • I have added a brief description of why this PR is necessary and/or what this PR solves.
  • Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.
  • Optional. For bug fixes, I've indicated what older releases this fix should be cherry-picked into (this may or may not happen depending on risk/complexity).

Signed-off-by: nitishfy <justnitish06@gmail.com>
@nitishfy
nitishfy requested a review from a team as a code owner July 20, 2026 11:05
@bunnyshell

bunnyshell Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❗ Preview Environment deployment failed on Bunnyshell

See: Environment Details | Pipeline Logs

Available commands (reply to this comment):

  • 🚀 /bns:deploy to redeploy the environment
  • /bns:delete to remove the environment

@nitishfy nitishfy self-assigned this Jul 20, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bundle Report

Bundle size has no change ✅

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.74359% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (master@6b852eb). Learn more about missing BASE report.
⚠️ Report is 70 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
applicationset/services/scm_provider/utils.go 89.74% 2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #28811   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   65.30%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      426           
  Lines             ?    59975           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?    39168           
  Misses            ?    17213           
  Partials          ?     3594           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 26.81% <51.28%> (?)
unit-tests 60.70% <89.74%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ppapapetrou76 ppapapetrou76 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

app: argocd-redis-ha
secrets:
- name: argocd-redis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the changes in this file look like they are not relevant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah i think maybe that's the reason why codegen is failing, let me try that again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SCM Generator: Filters are not evaluated independently SCM Provider Generator pathsExists false positives for gitlab < 17.7 users

2 participants