-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Agents
Canonical source:
AGENTS.md· Snapshot commit:6b8b70b72148
Updated: 2026-08-16
Scope: this entire repository.
The Phase 1 plan is a living control system, not a periodic report. Whenever accepted work changes a task's status, dates, milestone, owner, priority, description, dependencies, requirements, PRD/PID or design links, evidence, rollback impact, or issue mapping, update every affected projection in the same change:
- governing product, design, architecture, decision, and evidence documents;
- the editable roadmap generator;
- the generated JSON manifest and Markdown release plan;
- the repository issues and GitHub Project roadmap, when live mutation is authorized;
- the public issue map;
- the Excel release-plan workbook; and
- the append-only running log.
If live GitHub mutation is not explicitly authorized or cannot be completed safely, finish and validate the local projections, record Live GitHub sync pending with the exact reason and next command, and do not claim that the roadmap is synchronized.
- AI-agent resource index — orientation snapshot; refresh time-sensitive facts.
- Document index and authority order — current source precedence and reading paths.
- Phase 1 council decision — release and evidence boundary.
- GitHub Project sync runbook — complete schema, mutation, recovery, and UI instructions.
- Phase 1 release plan — human-readable task and evidence model.
- Security and Contributing — publication, synthetic-data, and frozen-evidence rules.
Direct owner instructions outrank repository documents. Do not silently resolve a conflict between authoritative sources; record it in the council decision record and the affected task before proceeding.
The historical Phase 1 P0-to-production Goal is superseded. On 2026-08-15 the Product Owner published the bounded P0/R0 Gold Goal through normal PR #69 and activated it from clean exact main 2dc4d05cdeca8cb9aeacf393076f6c6f946ff62b. It owns exactly eight P0/R0 task records, freezes all 50 R1-R10 tasks, and currently authorizes only Stage 0 local/public control-plane repair under existing issue #3. It does not itself authorize an R0 action, private access, authentic content, deployment, release, or production. The governing sources are:
-
P0-PHASE1-EXECUTION-AUTHORIZATION.md; -
P0-PHASE1-EXECUTION-COUNCIL-CHARTER.md; -
P0-PHASE1-EXECUTION-DECISIONS.md; and -
P0-OWNER-ACTION-LEDGER.md; and -
P0-CODEX-GOLD-GOAL-PROMPT-P0-R0-ONLY-2026-08-15.md.
Every one of the 58 canonical tasks is also governed by the P0 task Definition of Ready and task artifact register. The current baseline is exactly 58 Incomplete; 45 Hold + 13 Historical non-authorizing; 0 Ready; 0 execution-allowed. For the five substantive R0 tasks, Gate A may later permit only preparation of one named local/public/fictional/synthetic candidate; preparationAllowed can never substitute for executionAllowed. Gate B requires a later exact implementation/evidence candidate, one immutable stage and scope/action pair, independent executed QA, rollback evidence, current dependencies and owner actions, exact environment/authority where due, five exact-candidate seats, append-only stage publication, and exact-main guarded runtime verification. Historical AUD-001, PC-001, and PRD-R0-001 can never become execution stages. Roadmap status, code, a prototype, a shared PRD, a global plan, a control review, or Gate A cannot override Gate B.
The bounded activation changes no implementation, test, deployment, recovery, or production evidence by itself. Current execution authority is limited to R0 under the active bounded Goal, and routine R0 decisions are delegated to the five-seat execution council only when every named stage gate passes. All R1-R10 work is frozen and out of scope; any broader execution authority requires a new direct Product Owner activation. Human-only account/MFA/secret, terms/spend/provider, authentic-content, authentic-photo UAT, recovery-key, Recovery Ceremony, final R9, and irreversible R10 acts remain non-delegable.
Every newly created document or evidence/build artifact must have a basename beginning P0-. Existing canonical files, generated outputs, stable IDs, frozen v6–v10 artifacts, runtime/config filenames, and RUNNING_LOG.md are grandfathered; edit them under normal change control rather than renaming or duplicating them.
Before any private host/provider/tunnel/backup/production read or mutation, require the complete private deployment-authority record. Until then, use the exact state Unknown — private read authority pending and continue only local/public/synthetic work.
approved evidence, task state, and governing documents
|
v
tools/P0-generate-task-artifacts.mjs <- source-only readiness state + reviewer/approval/action registries
|
+--> docs/work-items/<TASK-ID>/P0-<TASK-ID>-*.md
+--> docs/project/P0-PHASE1-TASK-ARTIFACT-REGISTER.json
|
v
tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs <- edit releases/tasks; status comes from the P0 task-state ledger
|
+--> docs/project/PHASE1-ROADMAP-MANIFEST.json
+--> docs/project/PHASE1-RELEASE-PLAN.md
|
v
repeat both generators and reject byte drift
|
v
tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs <- clean exact origin/main only
|
+--> mismatched bodies on the existing 58 issues
+--> mismatched values in the existing 58 Project items / 17 managed fields
|
v
tools/build_phase1_release_plan.mjs
|
+--> task-scoped review workbook
+--> outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsx
The generated roadmap manifest is the canonical machine-readable delivery contract. It is not the editing surface. Readiness input is source-only: never set artifactReadiness, executionDecision, executionAllowed, aggregate dependency/authority/action satisfaction, blockers, or next action. The evaluator derives them, the validator independently rebuilds all 58 inputs and compares every projection, and the runtime verifier repeats the decision at actual start time. Update source files and run both generators twice; never hand-edit only the register, manifest, generated Markdown plan, live GitHub fields, issue map, or workbook.
Use only Backlog, Next, In progress, and Done.
| Status | Required meaning |
|---|---|
| Backlog | Scoped, but not selected for immediate execution. |
| Next | Entry conditions are being prepared; a named dependency or gate still controls start. |
| In progress | Actual work has begun and linked evidence exists; exit criteria remain incomplete. |
| Done | The task's named acceptanceEvidence exists and is linked. |
Apply these rules strictly:
- Evidence precedes status. Never promote a task because of intention, elapsed time, code existence, a PR merge, a prototype/demo, or a backup upload alone.
- A planning or product-definition task marked Done proves only its named planning artifact. It does not prove implementation, testing, deployment, production readiness, or release acceptance.
- Implementation, persistent-data, QA, and release tasks need the applicable merged implementation, tests, migration, restore, rollback, defect-gate, and owner-acceptance evidence named by the task.
- Prototype evidence is design intent unless the task explicitly asks for prototype evidence. It cannot close an implementation or release task.
- GitHub issue open/closed state and Project Status are separate. The current sync tool cannot change either; any future state/status mutation needs a separately reviewed and authorized control change.
- Planned dates are estimates. Evidence gates control entry and exit.
- Keep R10 release and task dates blank until its measured storage trigger is explicitly approved.
Never conflate the state vocabularies. Task status is Backlog, Next, In progress, or Done; artifact readiness is Incomplete or Ready; execution decision is Hold, Historical non-authorizing, or a gate-specific readiness decision; issue state is Open or Closed; permission is the separate boolean executionAllowed; and a control review can be only Hold or Accepted for merge. Stage state is separately one of declared, ready, running, verification-pending, recovery-required, rolling-back, verified-complete, verified-rolled-back, cancelled-before-mutation, blocked-no-mutation, or expired-before-mutation. Never display an unqualified Ready, Approved, Complete, or Done. A verified stage does not make its task Done without the task's named acceptance evidence and reviewed delivery transition.
Work in a clean, isolated worktree. Preserve unrelated changes.
git status --short --branch
git diff --checkRead the affected issue, manifest task, dependencies, acceptance evidence, release PRD/PID, design and architecture links, and current GitHub state. Link durable evidence; do not paste secrets, personal content, or raw private-service responses.
Update the governing source document or decision record first. Then edit the generator's release/task definition, status, dates, dependencies, requirements, links, evidence, and rollback impact as needed.
On every accepted planning refresh, update all three date literals to the actual refresh date: the roadmap generator's generatedAt, the task-artifact generator's generatedAt, and the workbook builder's generated-on subtitle date. Keep all three aligned; do not change release/task dates without evidence and approval.
Do not renumber a stable task or requirement ID casually. A scope change must update every validator and traceability artifact deliberately.
node --check tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs
node --check tools/P0-generate-task-artifacts.mjs
node --check tools/P0-validate-execution-controls.mjs
node --check tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs
node --check tools/build_phase1_release_plan.mjs
node tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs
node tools/P0-generate-task-artifacts.mjs
node tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs
node tools/P0-validate-execution-controls.mjs
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjsThe sync command is dry-run by default: it starts no gh process and writes no file. Review the complete plan and correct source drift before any mutation.
The task-artifact generator creates missing artifacts, preserves existing specialist content, and recomputes the register. Use --refresh-drafts only for an explicitly reviewed bootstrap/remediation rewrite; it may replace every still-draft task artifact and therefore must not be used casually after specialist drafting starts. It never replaces non-draft artifacts.
Validate the generated contract dynamically; status counts must match the current manifest rather than a historical snapshot:
jq -e '
(.releases | length) == 12 and
(.tasks | length) == 58 and
(.requirementMap | length) == 78 and
([.tasks[].id] | length) == ([.tasks[].id] | unique | length) and
([.tasks[].status] - ["Backlog", "Next", "In progress", "Done"] | length) == 0 and
([.releases[] | select(.id == "R10" and (.startDate != null or .targetDate != null))] | length) == 0 and
([.tasks[] | select(.milestone == "R10" and (.startDate != null or .targetDate != null))] | length) == 0
' docs/project/PHASE1-ROADMAP-MANIFEST.jsonUse the least expansive mode that covers the accepted delta. The live target is Life Reflection Project #1.
# Confirm the active account without printing a token:
gh auth status --hostname github.com
# Read-only Project access on a new credential:
gh auth refresh -h github.com -s read:project
# Approved Project mutation on a new credential; do not run both refreshes:
gh auth refresh -h github.com -s project
# Repository issues and milestones are already correct; update only mismatched values in existing Project fields:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --project-only
# Update only mismatched bodies on the existing 58 issues:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --issues-onlyEvery apply first fetches canonical origin and requires a clean non-detached branch tracking origin/main with exact HEAD === origin/main. Plain --apply may update only mismatched existing issue bodies and existing Project field values after the complete preflight. It cannot create or reconfigure issues, items, fields, views, labels, milestones, or workflows, and it cannot change issue state/status/labels/milestones.
Keep the stable [TASK-ID] prefix and hidden task marker on every managed issue; the sync uses the public issue map plus those signals as identity and refuses ambiguous or drifted issues. Managed issue bodies are source projections, so put durable evidence and metadata in the governing documents and generator rather than relying on manual issue-only edits.
Do not use full sync for a Project-only change. After any authorized delta apply, verify immediately and again after two consecutive read-only snapshots show no further relevant issue or Project workflow changes; an immediate pass alone can precede asynchronous automation. A partial failure can still leave drift because GitHub mutations are not transactional.
The operation is idempotent by stable task ID but is not transactional. On an API or network failure, stop, inspect the partial state, fix the authoritative source or access problem, and rerun the appropriate idempotent mode. Never claim synchronization until a read-only reconciliation passes. Deletion of an issue, milestone, field, option, item, or view is a separate destructive action and needs explicit authorization.
The existing-only apply never rewrites PHASE1-GITHUB-ISSUES.json; the complete preflight requires that map to match before the first mutation. Rerun the manifest generator after an authorized source change, but do not claim or fabricate an issue-map refresh unless a separately authorized issue-identity change actually occurred:
node tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjsFor the workbook, use the installed spreadsheets:Spreadsheets skill and follow it fully: load the workspace dependency runtime, use only its Node and node_modules, prepare the untracked working-directory dependency link it prescribes, and run its artifact-operation marker exactly once immediately before the first workbook edit. This builder writes two .xlsx copies, so use operation kind edit and expected output count 2. Do not install a replacement spreadsheet library, modify the provided dependency directory, or manually edit the generated .xlsx.
workbook_run_id="P0-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
node tools/build_phase1_release_plan.mjs "$workbook_run_id"
shasum -a 256 \
"outputs/$workbook_run_id/P0-Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsx" \
outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsxThe builder must report 12 releases, 58 tasks, 78 requirements, and zero formula errors. Its built-in inspection and previews are smoke checks over leading ranges, not proof of the complete workbook. Use the spreadsheet skill to inspect every used row and formula, confirm all 58 issue URLs and all R10 blanks programmatically, and render additional paginated ranges so every task, release, requirement, risk, and guide row is visually covered. Inspect /tmp/life-in-days-phase1-workbook-$workbook_run_id/workbook-inspect.txt and the built-in preview for each sheet as part of that full review:
- Executive Summary
- Release Plan
- Roadmap Tasks
- Roadmap Timeline
- Requirement Map
- Risks & Gates
- Review Guide
Reject the workbook if a formula error, clipping, broken layout, stale issue URL, incorrect count, or R10 date appears. The resolved Review Guide must contain exactly one visible Source manifest SHA-256 label/value whose digest equals the raw current manifest bytes. The task-scoped and canonical workbook hashes must match. Only outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsx is the stable public copy; task-scoped exports are local review artifacts covered by .gitignore when their directory begins with at least four hexadecimal characters.
After an authorized apply, run read-only checks:
gh project view 1 --owner arunpr614 --format json
gh project field-list 1 --owner arunpr614 --limit 100 --format json
gh project item-list 1 --owner arunpr614 --limit 100 --format json
gh issue list --repo arunpr614/Life-Reflection --state all --limit 100 \
--json number,title,state,labels,milestone,urlCompare, do not merely count. Require one issue-backed Project item for every manifest task and exact agreement for title, body, labels, milestone, issue state, all 17 managed Project fields, six dossier links and hashes, readiness, execution scope, and explicit execution authorization. The raw Project can contain separately filtered PR records, so it need not total 58; the two delivery views must contain exactly the manifest's current 58 phase1 issues.
These CLI commands are discovery dumps, not the pass/fail result. Use node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --verify for the reusable read-only live-parity check, then retain only its sanitized counts and mismatch list. Do not repeat the historical “580 checks” claim; the current contract manages 17 fields and must be verified from the current merged revision.
Open GitHub and visually verify the UI-only settings:
- Phase 1 Status: board layout, grouped into Backlog / Next / In progress / Done by Status, with all planning fields visible.
- Phase 1 Roadmap: roadmap layout, grouped by Milestone, Start date and Target date driving bars, Month zoom, and no optional marker unless approved.
- Both views show the current manifest status distribution and no non-delivery issue.
- R10 has no milestone due date, Start date, or Target date.
Append an evidence-focused entry to RUNNING_LOG.md. State what changed, which sources were updated, whether GitHub was mutated, exact validation performed, and any pending external sync. Do not rewrite prior log entries.
Before handing off:
git status --short
git diff --check
git diff --statCommit the source change and all regenerated tracked projections together. Do not push, open a pull request, deploy, or mutate another external system unless the user explicitly authorizes it.
Generated issue and artifact links target main. Do not claim publication is complete until every referenced path exists on remote main; a local commit or feature-branch file is not enough.
-
acceptanceEvidencedescribes the evidence required; it is not itself proof. BeforeIn progressorDone, record retrievable evidence links in the task dossier and affected issue or decision record, then review them manually. Never let status logic orexecutionAllowedsubstitute for semantic review. - Live apply first fetches canonical origin and requires a clean non-detached branch tracking
origin/mainwith exactHEAD === origin/main. It then resolves all existing issues, items, fields, and views before the first mutation. It may change only mismatched issue bodies and existing field values; issue/item/field/view/workflow creation and status/state/label/milestone mutation fail closed. - The dry-run validates local shape but does not query live GitHub. A successful dry-run is not live reconciliation.
- Workbook acceptance requires whole-workbook programmatic inspection plus all 20 paginated renders and an exact visible raw-manifest SHA-256 binding in the resolved Review Guide. Same-build canonical/review copies must hash equally; an isolated rebuild is compared by sheet/order/used-range/cell/formula/link/count/R10/render semantics rather than OOXML ZIP packaging bytes. CI also requires every one of the 352 canonical generated targets to remain a tracked, present, clean regular
100644Git blob. - The roadmap-generator
generatedAt, task-artifact-generatorgeneratedAt, and workbook subtitle date are literals. Update all three during every accepted refresh until each consumer derives its date from one canonical source.
Treat these as known controls, not optional improvement ideas. If the compensating check cannot be completed, leave the task blocked and state which tool gap prevented trustworthy synchronization.
The 2026-08-14 P0 publication reconciliation verified that both delivery views now use repo:arunpr614/Life-Reflection is:issue label:phase1; the Status board remains grouped by Status and the Roadmap remains grouped by Milestone. Two quiescent read-only verifier snapshots returned zero mismatches. Project #1 still has workflows that can auto-add open issues/PRs and sub-issues, set Backlog on add, set Done on close, and close items moved to Done. The reviewed API does not expose their complete filters and effects, and the P0 publication did not change them.
Therefore:
- Do not create unrelated or Wayfinder issues until an authorized hardening change narrows the Project auto-add/workflow boundaries to
label:phase1, or places those issues in a separate Project. Saved-view narrowing is complete but does not satisfy the workflow gate. - View filtering alone is not containment; hidden items can still affect shared Status, closure automation, raw Project state, and Insights.
- After any issue creation, confirm that only canonical
phase1delivery issues feed the two delivery views and delivery workflows. - Do not change workflow rules casually; audit their filters and effects, preserve unrelated behavior, and verify the full projection afterward.
The repository and repository issues are public even though Project #1 is private.
Before any live apply, manually review every changed task description, evidence requirement/link, rollback/restore statement, and artifact URL exactly as it will appear in a public issue. Then scan unstaged, staged, and untracked text; any match requires investigation and sanitization, not blind deletion:
safety_pattern='(/(Users)/|/var/(folders)/|file[:]//|github[_]pat_|gh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}|(^|[^A-Za-z0-9_])sk[-_][A-Za-z0-9_-]{12,}|Bearer[[:space:]]+[A-Za-z0-9._-]{12,}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|xox[baprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,}|BEGIN[[:space:]].*PRIVATE[[:space:]]KEY|PVT[A-Z_][A-Za-z0-9_]+)'
umask 077
safety_scan_dir="$(mktemp -d)" || {
echo 'Could not create the protected safety-scan directory.' >&2
exit 1
}
trap 'rm -r -- "$safety_scan_dir"' EXIT
git diff --no-ext-diff -- . >"$safety_scan_dir/unstaged.diff" || {
echo 'Could not materialize the unstaged diff for safety scanning.' >&2
exit 1
}
git diff --cached --no-ext-diff -- . >"$safety_scan_dir/staged.diff" || {
echo 'Could not materialize the staged diff for safety scanning.' >&2
exit 1
}
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -z >"$safety_scan_dir/untracked.z" || {
echo 'Could not enumerate untracked files for safety scanning.' >&2
exit 1
}
for diff_kind in unstaged staged; do
diff_scan_status=0
rg --no-messages -q "$safety_pattern" "$safety_scan_dir/$diff_kind.diff" || diff_scan_status=$?
if [ "$diff_scan_status" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Potential sensitive value detected in $diff_kind changes; inspect in a protected local workflow." >&2
exit 1
elif [ "$diff_scan_status" -gt 1 ]; then
echo "$diff_kind safety scan failed." >&2
exit "$diff_scan_status"
fi
done
untracked_scan_failed=0
while IFS= read -r -d '' candidate_file; do
candidate_scan_status=0
rg --no-messages -I -q "$safety_pattern" -- "$candidate_file" || candidate_scan_status=$?
if [ "$candidate_scan_status" -eq 0 ]; then
untracked_scan_failed=1
break
elif [ "$candidate_scan_status" -gt 1 ]; then
echo 'Untracked-file safety scan failed.' >&2
exit "$candidate_scan_status"
fi
done <"$safety_scan_dir/untracked.z"
if [ "$untracked_scan_failed" -ne 0 ]; then
echo 'Potential sensitive value detected in an untracked file; inspect in a protected local workflow.' >&2
exit 1
fiThese checks deliberately print no matching line or filename, because the match itself may be sensitive. A clean regex scan cannot prove the absence of personal content, private URLs, or sensitive topology. Human semantic review remains required; never paste a detected value into a task log while investigating it.
- Never publish authentic journals, photos, photo-derived descriptions, personal identifiers, credentials, tokens, browser state, private URLs, host topology, private Project node IDs, or raw provider/service responses.
- Never send real photos or photo-derived data to an AI provider.
- Use fictional fixtures and sanitized evidence only.
- Never claim that a feature was tested, deployed, restored, production-verified, or released without direct named evidence.
- Keep implementation, deployment, publication, and live GitHub authorization separate.
A roadmap-affecting change is complete only when:
- governing evidence and the editable generator agree;
- manifest, Markdown plan, issue map, live GitHub projection where authorized, and Excel workbook agree;
- status/evidence language is truthful and status counts match the current manifest;
- issue links and all Project fields reconcile by stable task ID;
- the two saved views and their UI-only settings pass visual inspection after live changes;
- R10 remains undated unless its trigger is approved;
- workbook formulas, all seven visual previews, and both output hashes pass;
- privacy and publication scans are clean;
-
RUNNING_LOG.mdrecords the result and any pending sync; and - the agent reports local-only, committed, pushed, and live-mutated state precisely.
If any one of these checks fails, the living plan is not synchronized. Fix it or leave a precise blocker; never paper over drift.
Generated from arunpr614/Life-Reflection@6b8b70b72148 · Canonical content lives in Git · Fictional prototype data only
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host runbook
- Life in Days — Phase1 implementation plan
- PID R10 — Conditional Object-Store Transition
- PRD R0 — Shared-Host Private Foundation
- PRD R1 — Manual Journal Archive
- PRD R2 — Telegram Photo Capture
- PRD R3 — Retrieval and Date Integrity
- PRD R4 — Source History and Lifecycle Safety
- PRD R5 — Prospective VoiceNotes Sync
- PRD R6 — Generated Text Reflection
- PRD R7 — Generated Artwork
- PRD R8 — Operational Scale and Resilience
- PRD R9 — Private Launch Acceptance and Stabilization
- Life in Days release documents
- Life in Days Phase 1 — AI agent resource index
- Codex Goal prompt — Phase 1 P0 requirements to private production
- P0 Codex Gold Goal prompt — complete P0 and R0 only
- Phase 1 GitHub Project V2 sync
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Release Plan
- Life in Days — detailed implementation plan
- Life in Days Global PRD
- Life in Days — project tracker
- Life in Days — prototype completeness tracker
- Life in Days — requirements traceability
- Life in Days — UX specification
- Life in Days — AI Artwork Model Evaluation
- Life in Days — AI Text Model Evaluation
- Initial product brief
- Life in Days: Private Media Storage Evaluation
- Requirements under discovery
- Product and integration research
- Project Git provenance
- Life in Days — proposed shared understanding
- Life in Days — Product Council planning-baseline review
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Independent QA Lead charter
- Agent charter — Project Manager
- Agent charter — Senior Product Manager
- Agent charter — Technical Architect
- Agent charter — UI/UX Design Lead
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 Owner Action Ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution context digest
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution authorization addendum
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution council charter
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution decision ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 task Definition of Ready
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution-control review
- P0/R0 Stage 0 control-repair candidate review dossier
- P0/R0 Stage 0 delivery checklist
- P0/R0 Stage 0 rollback and recovery plan
- P0/R0 Stage 0 state contract
- P0/R0 Stage 0 test plan
- PC-001 readiness-control hardening — planning review
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Product Council Decision Record
- Life in Days Phase 1 — source baseline
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Product Council charter
- Life in Days — Product Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Project Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Product Council UX Design Review
- Life in Days Product Council
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days — unified Calendar and Almanac prototype v3
- Life in Days — Museum Margin Calendar prototype v4
- Life in Days — private Settings and compact privacy prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days — Calendar contract prototype v7
- Life in Days — Cross-month Almanac prototype v8
- Life in Days — First-use Readiness prototype v9
- Life in Days — Resilient Application Shell prototype v10
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days unified calendar prototype v3
- Life in Days Museum Margin prototype v4
- Life in Days Settings prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Calendar contract completion
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Cross-month Almanac
- Life in Days prototype v9 — First-use Readiness
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Resilient Application Shell
- v6 Product Council contract — Private Search State
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v9 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days v2 — design QA
- Life in Days unified prototype v3 — design QA
- Life in Days v4 — design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v6 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days v7 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days prototype v8 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v9 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v10 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v5 — PRD feature audit
- AI agent operating contract — keep Phase 1 alive
- Contributing to Life in Days
- GitHub Projects Roadmap — current capability research
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host deployment spike
- Wayfinder for Life in Days Phase 1 — adoption and GitHub integration report
- Life in Days — GitHub Projects Roadmap design spike
- ARCH-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R0-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R1-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R2-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R3-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R4-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R5-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R6-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R7-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R8-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R8-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R8-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R10-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R10-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R10-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — task technical plan
- AUD-001 — Product Council task readiness
- AUD-001 — task delivery checklist
- AUD-001 — task design specification
- AUD-001 — task product requirements
- AUD-001 — task QA plan
- AUD-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R0-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R1-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R3-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R5-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R6-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R7-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R7-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R6-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R7-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening Council record
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening delivery plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control evidence design specification
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening product requirements
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening QA plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening technical plan
- PID-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PID-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- PID-R10-001 — task design specification
- PID-R10-001 — task product requirements
- PID-R10-001 — task QA plan
- PID-R10-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R0-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R0-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R0-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R0-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R1-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R1-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R1-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R1-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R2-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R2-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R2-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R2-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R3-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R3-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R3-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R3-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R4-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R4-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R4-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R4-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R5-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R5-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R5-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R5-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R6-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R6-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R6-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R6-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R7-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R7-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R7-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R8-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R8-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R8-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R8-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R9-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R9-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R9-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R9-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R8-001 — task design specification
- QA-R8-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R8-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R8-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R9-001 — task design specification
- QA-R9-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R9-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R0-001 — task design specification
- REL-R0-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R0-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R0-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R1-001 — task design specification
- REL-R1-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R1-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R1-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R2-001 — task design specification
- REL-R2-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R2-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R2-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R3-001 — task design specification
- REL-R3-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R3-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R3-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R4-001 — task design specification
- REL-R4-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R4-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R4-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R5-001 — task design specification
- REL-R5-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R5-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R5-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R6-001 — task design specification
- REL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R7-001 — task design specification
- REL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R8-001 — task design specification
- REL-R8-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R8-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R8-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R9-001 — task design specification
- REL-R9-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R9-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R10-001 — task design specification
- REL-R10-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R10-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R10-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R0-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R0-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R0-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R0-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R5-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R5-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R5-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R0-001 — task design specification
- UX-R0-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R0-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R0-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R1-001 — task design specification
- UX-R1-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R1-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R1-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R2-001 — task design specification
- UX-R2-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R2-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R2-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R3-001 — task design specification
- UX-R3-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R3-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R3-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R4-001 — task design specification
- UX-R4-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R4-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R4-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R5-001 — task design specification
- UX-R5-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R5-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R6-001 — task design specification
- UX-R6-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R6-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R6-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R7-001 — task design specification
- UX-R7-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R7-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R7-001 — task technical plan
- Life in Days — document index
- Life in Days
- Life in Days - Running Log
- Publication provenance
- Pull-Request-Template
- Life in Days
- Security and privacy reporting