-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Agents
Canonical source:
AGENTS.md· Snapshot commit:dbd497b496c0
Updated: 2026-08-14
Scope: this entire repository.
The Phase 1 plan is a living control system, not a periodic report. Whenever accepted work changes a task's status, dates, milestone, owner, priority, description, dependencies, requirements, PRD/PID or design links, evidence, rollback impact, or issue mapping, update every affected projection in the same change:
- governing product, design, architecture, decision, and evidence documents;
- the editable roadmap generator;
- the generated JSON manifest and Markdown release plan;
- the repository issues and GitHub Project roadmap, when live mutation is authorized;
- the public issue map;
- the Excel release-plan workbook; and
- the append-only running log.
If live GitHub mutation is not explicitly authorized or cannot be completed safely, finish and validate the local projections, record Live GitHub sync pending with the exact reason and next command, and do not claim that the roadmap is synchronized.
- AI-agent resource index — orientation snapshot; refresh time-sensitive facts.
- Document index and authority order — current source precedence and reading paths.
- Phase 1 council decision — release and evidence boundary.
- GitHub Project sync runbook — complete schema, mutation, recovery, and UI instructions.
- Phase 1 release plan — human-readable task and evidence model.
- Security and Contributing — publication, synthetic-data, and frozen-evidence rules.
Direct owner instructions outrank repository documents. Do not silently resolve a conflict between authoritative sources; record it in the council decision record and the affected task before proceeding.
The Product Owner directly activated the committed Phase 1 P0-to-production Goal on 2026-08-14. The current public-safe execution authority is recorded in:
-
P0-PHASE1-EXECUTION-AUTHORIZATION.md; -
P0-PHASE1-EXECUTION-COUNCIL-CHARTER.md; -
P0-PHASE1-EXECUTION-DECISIONS.md; and -
P0-OWNER-ACTION-LEDGER.md.
Every one of the 58 canonical tasks is also governed by the P0 task Definition of Ready and task artifact register. A substantive task may start only when its Product, Architecture, Design, QA, Delivery, and Council artifacts pass at an exact reviewed revision and the manifest records executionAllowed=true. Roadmap status, code, a prototype, a shared PRD, or a global plan cannot override this gate. All task dossiers begin as drafts; generation is not approval.
That activation supersedes historical universal G1/“implementation not authorized” stops, but it changes no implementation, test, deployment, recovery, or production evidence by itself. Routine R0–R8 decisions are delegated to the five-seat execution council only when every named gate passes. Human-only account/MFA/secret, terms/spend/provider, authentic-content, authentic-photo UAT, recovery-key, Recovery Ceremony, final R9, and irreversible R10 acts remain non-delegable.
Every newly created document or evidence/build artifact must have a basename beginning P0-. Existing canonical files, generated outputs, stable IDs, frozen v6–v10 artifacts, runtime/config filenames, and RUNNING_LOG.md are grandfathered; edit them under normal change control rather than renaming or duplicating them.
Before any private host/provider/tunnel/backup/production read or mutation, require the complete private deployment-authority record. Until then, use the exact state Unknown — private read authority pending and continue only local/public/synthetic work.
approved evidence, task state, and governing documents
|
v
tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs <- edit releases/tasks; status comes from the P0 task-state ledger
|
+--> docs/project/PHASE1-ROADMAP-MANIFEST.json
+--> docs/project/PHASE1-RELEASE-PLAN.md
|
v
tools/P0-generate-task-artifacts.mjs
|
+--> docs/work-items/<TASK-ID>/P0-<TASK-ID>-*.md
+--> docs/project/P0-PHASE1-TASK-ARTIFACT-REGISTER.json
|
v
rerun the manifest generator to embed dossier hashes/readiness
|
v
tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs
|
+--> GitHub issues, milestones, Project fields and saved views
+--> docs/project/PHASE1-GITHUB-ISSUES.json
|
v
rerun the manifest generator to resolve current issue URLs
|
v
tools/build_phase1_release_plan.mjs
|
+--> task-scoped review workbook
+--> outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsx
The generated roadmap manifest is the canonical machine-readable delivery contract. It is not the editing surface. Update releases, definitions, status logic, evidence, and related metadata in tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs, together with the source evidence. Never hand-edit only the manifest, generated Markdown plan, GitHub fields, issue map, or workbook.
Use only Backlog, Next, In progress, and Done.
| Status | Required meaning |
|---|---|
| Backlog | Scoped, but not selected for immediate execution. |
| Next | Entry conditions are being prepared; a named dependency or gate still controls start. |
| In progress | Actual work has begun and linked evidence exists; exit criteria remain incomplete. |
| Done | The task's named acceptanceEvidence exists and is linked. |
Apply these rules strictly:
- Evidence precedes status. Never promote a task because of intention, elapsed time, code existence, a PR merge, a prototype/demo, or a backup upload alone.
- A planning or product-definition task marked Done proves only its named planning artifact. It does not prove implementation, testing, deployment, production readiness, or release acceptance.
- Implementation, persistent-data, QA, and release tasks need the applicable merged implementation, tests, migration, restore, rollback, defect-gate, and owner-acceptance evidence named by the task.
- Prototype evidence is design intent unless the task explicitly asks for prototype evidence. It cannot close an implementation or release task.
- GitHub issue open/closed state and Project Status are separate. Review every currently Done task before using
--close-done. - Planned dates are estimates. Evidence gates control entry and exit.
- Keep R10 release and task dates blank until its measured storage trigger is explicitly approved.
Work in a clean, isolated worktree. Preserve unrelated changes.
git status --short --branch
git diff --checkRead the affected issue, manifest task, dependencies, acceptance evidence, release PRD/PID, design and architecture links, and current GitHub state. Link durable evidence; do not paste secrets, personal content, or raw private-service responses.
Update the governing source document or decision record first. Then edit the generator's release/task definition, status, dates, dependencies, requirements, links, evidence, and rollback impact as needed.
On every accepted planning refresh, update the generator's generatedAt literal and the workbook builder's generated-on subtitle date to the actual refresh date. Keep those two dates aligned; do not change release/task dates without evidence and approval.
Do not renumber a stable task or requirement ID casually. A scope change must update every validator and traceability artifact deliberately.
node --check tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs
node --check tools/P0-generate-task-artifacts.mjs
node --check tools/P0-validate-execution-controls.mjs
node --check tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs
node --check tools/build_phase1_release_plan.mjs
node tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs
node tools/P0-generate-task-artifacts.mjs
node tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjs
node tools/P0-validate-execution-controls.mjs
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjsThe sync command is dry-run by default: it starts no gh process and writes no file. Review the complete plan and correct source drift before any mutation.
The task-artifact generator creates missing artifacts, preserves existing specialist content, and recomputes the register. Use --refresh-drafts only for an explicitly reviewed bootstrap/remediation rewrite; it may replace every still-draft task artifact and therefore must not be used casually after specialist drafting starts. It never replaces non-draft artifacts.
Validate the generated contract dynamically; status counts must match the current manifest rather than a historical snapshot:
jq -e '
(.releases | length) == 12 and
(.tasks | length) == 58 and
(.requirementMap | length) == 78 and
([.tasks[].id] | length) == ([.tasks[].id] | unique | length) and
([.tasks[].status] - ["Backlog", "Next", "In progress", "Done"] | length) == 0 and
([.releases[] | select(.id == "R10" and (.startDate != null or .targetDate != null))] | length) == 0 and
([.tasks[] | select(.milestone == "R10" and (.startDate != null or .targetDate != null))] | length) == 0
' docs/project/PHASE1-ROADMAP-MANIFEST.jsonUse the least expansive mode that covers the accepted delta. The live target is Life Reflection Project #1.
# Confirm the active account without printing a token:
gh auth status --hostname github.com
# Read-only Project access on a new credential:
gh auth refresh -h github.com -s read:project
# Approved Project mutation on a new credential; do not run both refreshes:
gh auth refresh -h github.com -s project
# Repository issues and milestones are already correct; refresh Project fields/views only:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --project-only
# Reconcile issues, milestones, Project fields/views, and evidence-backed issue closure:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --close-doneDo not casually run plain --apply against the live baseline. It updates issue metadata, opens non-Done issues, and preserves existing Done issue state; --close-done additionally closes only manifest-Done tasks. Use --close-done only after evidence review.
Keep the stable [TASK-ID] prefix at the beginning of every managed issue title; the sync uses it as issue identity, and removing it can create a duplicate. Managed issue bodies and label sets are replaced by a full repository sync, so put durable evidence and metadata in the governing documents and generator rather than relying on manual issue-only edits.
The current full sync does not use an open-first state transition: its first pass preserves issue state, and its second pass opens non-Done items and optionally closes Done items. Do not use full sync for a Project-only change; when repository metadata truly must change, use an explicitly authorized maintenance window and verify final issue state immediately. Then verify again after two consecutive read-only snapshots show no further relevant issue or Project workflow changes; an immediate pass alone can precede asynchronous automation. A partial failure can still leave drift because GitHub mutations are not transactional.
The operation is idempotent by stable task ID but is not transactional. On an API or network failure, stop, inspect the partial state, fix the authoritative source or access problem, and rerun the appropriate idempotent mode. Never claim synchronization until a read-only reconciliation passes. Deletion of an issue, milestone, field, option, item, or view is a separate destructive action and needs explicit authorization.
An authorized apply rewrites PHASE1-GITHUB-ISSUES.json. Rerun the generator so the manifest carries current issue numbers and URLs:
node tools/generate_phase1_roadmap_manifest.mjsFor the workbook, use the installed spreadsheets:Spreadsheets skill and follow it fully: load the workspace dependency runtime, use only its Node and node_modules, prepare the untracked working-directory dependency link it prescribes, and run its artifact-operation marker exactly once immediately before the first workbook edit. This builder writes two .xlsx copies, so use operation kind edit and expected output count 2. Do not install a replacement spreadsheet library, modify the provided dependency directory, or manually edit the generated .xlsx.
workbook_run_id="$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
node tools/build_phase1_release_plan.mjs "$workbook_run_id"
shasum -a 256 \
"outputs/$workbook_run_id/P0-Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsx" \
outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsxThe builder must report 12 releases, 58 tasks, 78 requirements, and zero formula errors. Its built-in inspection and previews are smoke checks over leading ranges, not proof of the complete workbook. Use the spreadsheet skill to inspect every used row and formula, confirm all 58 issue URLs and all R10 blanks programmatically, and render additional paginated ranges so every task, release, requirement, risk, and guide row is visually covered. Inspect /tmp/life-in-days-phase1-workbook-$workbook_run_id/workbook-inspect.txt and the built-in preview for each sheet as part of that full review:
- Executive Summary
- Release Plan
- Roadmap Tasks
- Roadmap Timeline
- Requirement Map
- Risks & Gates
- Review Guide
Reject the workbook if a formula error, clipping, broken layout, stale issue URL, incorrect count, or R10 date appears. The task-scoped and canonical workbook hashes must match. Only outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsx is the stable public copy; task-scoped exports are local review artifacts covered by .gitignore when their directory begins with at least four hexadecimal characters.
After an authorized apply, run read-only checks:
gh project view 1 --owner arunpr614 --format json
gh project field-list 1 --owner arunpr614 --limit 100 --format json
gh project item-list 1 --owner arunpr614 --limit 100 --format json
gh issue list --repo arunpr614/Life-Reflection --state all --limit 100 \
--json number,title,state,labels,milestone,urlCompare, do not merely count. Require one issue-backed Project item for every manifest task and exact agreement for title, body, labels, milestone, issue state, all 17 managed Project fields, six dossier links and hashes, readiness, execution scope, and explicit execution authorization. The raw Project can contain separately filtered PR records, so it need not total 58; the two delivery views must contain exactly the manifest's current 58 phase1 issues.
These CLI commands are discovery dumps, not the pass/fail result. Use node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --verify for the reusable read-only live-parity check, then retain only its sanitized counts and mismatch list. Do not repeat the historical “580 checks” claim; the current contract manages 17 fields and must be verified from the current merged revision.
Open GitHub and visually verify the UI-only settings:
- Phase 1 Status: board layout, grouped into Backlog / Next / In progress / Done by Status, with all planning fields visible.
- Phase 1 Roadmap: roadmap layout, grouped by Milestone, Start date and Target date driving bars, Month zoom, and no optional marker unless approved.
- Both views show the current manifest status distribution and no non-delivery issue.
- R10 has no milestone due date, Start date, or Target date.
Append an evidence-focused entry to RUNNING_LOG.md. State what changed, which sources were updated, whether GitHub was mutated, exact validation performed, and any pending external sync. Do not rewrite prior log entries.
Before handing off:
git status --short
git diff --check
git diff --statCommit the source change and all regenerated tracked projections together. Do not push, open a pull request, deploy, or mutate another external system unless the user explicitly authorizes it.
Generated issue and artifact links target main. Do not claim publication is complete until every referenced path exists on remote main; a local commit or feature-branch file is not enough.
-
acceptanceEvidencedescribes the evidence required; it is not itself proof. BeforeIn progressorDone, record retrievable evidence links in the task dossier and affected issue or decision record, then review them manually. Never let status logic,executionAllowed, or--close-donesubstitute for semantic review. - The sync enforces five identity signals before mutation: title
[TASK-ID], hidden body marker,phase1label, issue-map entry, and manifest ID. Stop on any collision or mismatch. - The dry-run validates local shape but does not query live GitHub. A successful dry-run is not live reconciliation.
- The built-in workbook inspection and PNGs do not cover every row. Whole-workbook programmatic inspection plus paginated rendering is mandatory until the builder itself performs those checks.
-
generatedAtand the workbook subtitle date are literals. Update both during every accepted refresh until the builder derives its date from the manifest.
Treat these as known controls, not optional improvement ideas. If the compensating check cannot be completed, leave the task blocked and state which tool gap prevented trustworthy synchronization.
At the last live snapshot, both delivery views still used the broad filter repo:arunpr614/Life-Reflection is:issue. The current sync candidate requires repo:arunpr614/Life-Reflection is:issue label:phase1, but that narrowing is not live evidence until a staged view-only apply and read-only verification pass. Project #1 also has workflows that can auto-add open issues/PRs and sub-issues, set Backlog on add, set Done on close, and close items moved to Done.
Therefore:
- Do not create unrelated or Wayfinder issues until an authorized hardening change narrows both delivery views and Project auto-add/workflow boundaries to
label:phase1, or places those issues in a separate Project. - View filtering alone is not containment; hidden items can still affect shared Status, closure automation, raw Project state, and Insights.
- After any issue creation, confirm that only canonical
phase1delivery issues feed the two delivery views and delivery workflows. - Do not change workflow rules casually; audit their filters and effects, preserve unrelated behavior, and verify the full projection afterward.
The repository and repository issues are public even though Project #1 is private.
Before any live apply, manually review every changed task description, evidence requirement/link, rollback/restore statement, and artifact URL exactly as it will appear in a public issue. Then scan unstaged, staged, and untracked text; any match requires investigation and sanitization, not blind deletion:
safety_pattern='(/(Users)/|/var/(folders)/|file[:]//|github[_]pat_|gh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}|sk-[A-Za-z0-9_-]{20,}|Bearer[[:space:]]+[A-Za-z0-9._-]{12,}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|xox[baprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,}|BEGIN[[:space:]].*PRIVATE[[:space:]]KEY|PVT[A-Z_][A-Za-z0-9_]+)'
umask 077
safety_scan_dir="$(mktemp -d)" || {
echo 'Could not create the protected safety-scan directory.' >&2
exit 1
}
trap 'rm -r -- "$safety_scan_dir"' EXIT
git diff --no-ext-diff -- . >"$safety_scan_dir/unstaged.diff" || {
echo 'Could not materialize the unstaged diff for safety scanning.' >&2
exit 1
}
git diff --cached --no-ext-diff -- . >"$safety_scan_dir/staged.diff" || {
echo 'Could not materialize the staged diff for safety scanning.' >&2
exit 1
}
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -z >"$safety_scan_dir/untracked.z" || {
echo 'Could not enumerate untracked files for safety scanning.' >&2
exit 1
}
for diff_kind in unstaged staged; do
diff_scan_status=0
rg --no-messages -q "$safety_pattern" "$safety_scan_dir/$diff_kind.diff" || diff_scan_status=$?
if [ "$diff_scan_status" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Potential sensitive value detected in $diff_kind changes; inspect in a protected local workflow." >&2
exit 1
elif [ "$diff_scan_status" -gt 1 ]; then
echo "$diff_kind safety scan failed." >&2
exit "$diff_scan_status"
fi
done
untracked_scan_failed=0
while IFS= read -r -d '' candidate_file; do
candidate_scan_status=0
rg --no-messages -I -q "$safety_pattern" -- "$candidate_file" || candidate_scan_status=$?
if [ "$candidate_scan_status" -eq 0 ]; then
untracked_scan_failed=1
break
elif [ "$candidate_scan_status" -gt 1 ]; then
echo 'Untracked-file safety scan failed.' >&2
exit "$candidate_scan_status"
fi
done <"$safety_scan_dir/untracked.z"
if [ "$untracked_scan_failed" -ne 0 ]; then
echo 'Potential sensitive value detected in an untracked file; inspect in a protected local workflow.' >&2
exit 1
fiThese checks deliberately print no matching line or filename, because the match itself may be sensitive. A clean regex scan cannot prove the absence of personal content, private URLs, or sensitive topology. Human semantic review remains required; never paste a detected value into a task log while investigating it.
- Never publish authentic journals, photos, photo-derived descriptions, personal identifiers, credentials, tokens, browser state, private URLs, host topology, private Project node IDs, or raw provider/service responses.
- Never send real photos or photo-derived data to an AI provider.
- Use fictional fixtures and sanitized evidence only.
- Never claim that a feature was tested, deployed, restored, production-verified, or released without direct named evidence.
- Keep implementation, deployment, publication, and live GitHub authorization separate.
A roadmap-affecting change is complete only when:
- governing evidence and the editable generator agree;
- manifest, Markdown plan, issue map, live GitHub projection where authorized, and Excel workbook agree;
- status/evidence language is truthful and status counts match the current manifest;
- issue links and all Project fields reconcile by stable task ID;
- the two saved views and their UI-only settings pass visual inspection after live changes;
- R10 remains undated unless its trigger is approved;
- workbook formulas, all seven visual previews, and both output hashes pass;
- privacy and publication scans are clean;
-
RUNNING_LOG.mdrecords the result and any pending sync; and - the agent reports local-only, committed, pushed, and live-mutated state precisely.
If any one of these checks fails, the living plan is not synchronized. Fix it or leave a precise blocker; never paper over drift.
Generated from arunpr614/Life-Reflection@6b8b70b72148 · Canonical content lives in Git · Fictional prototype data only
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host runbook
- Life in Days — Phase1 implementation plan
- PID R10 — Conditional Object-Store Transition
- PRD R0 — Shared-Host Private Foundation
- PRD R1 — Manual Journal Archive
- PRD R2 — Telegram Photo Capture
- PRD R3 — Retrieval and Date Integrity
- PRD R4 — Source History and Lifecycle Safety
- PRD R5 — Prospective VoiceNotes Sync
- PRD R6 — Generated Text Reflection
- PRD R7 — Generated Artwork
- PRD R8 — Operational Scale and Resilience
- PRD R9 — Private Launch Acceptance and Stabilization
- Life in Days release documents
- Life in Days Phase 1 — AI agent resource index
- Codex Goal prompt — Phase 1 P0 requirements to private production
- P0 Codex Gold Goal prompt — complete P0 and R0 only
- Phase 1 GitHub Project V2 sync
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Release Plan
- Life in Days — detailed implementation plan
- Life in Days Global PRD
- Life in Days — project tracker
- Life in Days — prototype completeness tracker
- Life in Days — requirements traceability
- Life in Days — UX specification
- Life in Days — AI Artwork Model Evaluation
- Life in Days — AI Text Model Evaluation
- Initial product brief
- Life in Days: Private Media Storage Evaluation
- Requirements under discovery
- Product and integration research
- Project Git provenance
- Life in Days — proposed shared understanding
- Life in Days — Product Council planning-baseline review
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Independent QA Lead charter
- Agent charter — Project Manager
- Agent charter — Senior Product Manager
- Agent charter — Technical Architect
- Agent charter — UI/UX Design Lead
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 Owner Action Ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution context digest
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution authorization addendum
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution council charter
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution decision ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 task Definition of Ready
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution-control review
- P0/R0 Stage 0 control-repair candidate review dossier
- P0/R0 Stage 0 delivery checklist
- P0/R0 Stage 0 rollback and recovery plan
- P0/R0 Stage 0 state contract
- P0/R0 Stage 0 test plan
- PC-001 readiness-control hardening — planning review
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Product Council Decision Record
- Life in Days Phase 1 — source baseline
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Product Council charter
- Life in Days — Product Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Project Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Product Council UX Design Review
- Life in Days Product Council
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days — unified Calendar and Almanac prototype v3
- Life in Days — Museum Margin Calendar prototype v4
- Life in Days — private Settings and compact privacy prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days — Calendar contract prototype v7
- Life in Days — Cross-month Almanac prototype v8
- Life in Days — First-use Readiness prototype v9
- Life in Days — Resilient Application Shell prototype v10
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days unified calendar prototype v3
- Life in Days Museum Margin prototype v4
- Life in Days Settings prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Calendar contract completion
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Cross-month Almanac
- Life in Days prototype v9 — First-use Readiness
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Resilient Application Shell
- v6 Product Council contract — Private Search State
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v9 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days v2 — design QA
- Life in Days unified prototype v3 — design QA
- Life in Days v4 — design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v6 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days v7 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days prototype v8 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v9 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v10 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v5 — PRD feature audit
- AI agent operating contract — keep Phase 1 alive
- Contributing to Life in Days
- GitHub Projects Roadmap — current capability research
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host deployment spike
- Wayfinder for Life in Days Phase 1 — adoption and GitHub integration report
- Life in Days — GitHub Projects Roadmap design spike
- ARCH-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R0-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R1-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R2-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R3-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R4-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R5-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R6-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R7-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R8-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R8-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R8-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R10-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R10-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R10-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — task technical plan
- AUD-001 — Product Council task readiness
- AUD-001 — task delivery checklist
- AUD-001 — task design specification
- AUD-001 — task product requirements
- AUD-001 — task QA plan
- AUD-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R0-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R1-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R3-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R5-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R6-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R7-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R7-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R6-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R7-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening Council record
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening delivery plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control evidence design specification
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening product requirements
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening QA plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening technical plan
- PID-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PID-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- PID-R10-001 — task design specification
- PID-R10-001 — task product requirements
- PID-R10-001 — task QA plan
- PID-R10-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R0-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R0-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R0-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R0-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R1-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R1-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R1-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R1-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R2-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R2-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R2-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R2-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R3-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R3-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R3-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R3-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R4-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R4-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R4-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R4-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R5-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R5-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R5-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R5-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R6-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R6-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R6-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R6-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R7-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R7-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R7-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R8-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R8-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R8-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R8-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R9-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R9-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R9-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R9-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R8-001 — task design specification
- QA-R8-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R8-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R8-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R9-001 — task design specification
- QA-R9-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R9-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R0-001 — task design specification
- REL-R0-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R0-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R0-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R1-001 — task design specification
- REL-R1-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R1-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R1-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R2-001 — task design specification
- REL-R2-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R2-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R2-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R3-001 — task design specification
- REL-R3-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R3-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R3-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R4-001 — task design specification
- REL-R4-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R4-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R4-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R5-001 — task design specification
- REL-R5-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R5-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R5-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R6-001 — task design specification
- REL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R7-001 — task design specification
- REL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R8-001 — task design specification
- REL-R8-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R8-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R8-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R9-001 — task design specification
- REL-R9-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R9-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R10-001 — task design specification
- REL-R10-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R10-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R10-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R0-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R0-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R0-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R0-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R5-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R5-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R5-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R0-001 — task design specification
- UX-R0-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R0-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R0-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R1-001 — task design specification
- UX-R1-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R1-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R1-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R2-001 — task design specification
- UX-R2-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R2-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R2-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R3-001 — task design specification
- UX-R3-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R3-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R3-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R4-001 — task design specification
- UX-R4-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R4-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R4-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R5-001 — task design specification
- UX-R5-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R5-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R6-001 — task design specification
- UX-R6-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R6-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R6-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R7-001 — task design specification
- UX-R7-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R7-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R7-001 — task technical plan
- Life in Days — document index
- Life in Days
- Life in Days - Running Log
- Publication provenance
- Pull-Request-Template
- Life in Days
- Security and privacy reporting