Docs Council Execution Releases P0 P0 Execution Control Review

Canonical source: docs/council/execution/releases/P0-P0-EXECUTION-CONTROL-REVIEW.md · Snapshot commit: dbd497b496c0

Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution-control review

• Review date: 2026-08-14
• Roadmap attachment: PC-001; no new task or issue
• Candidate state: Five-seat accepted for repository publication through reviewed PR; live GitHub/Project/Wiki synchronization pending
• Deployment state: Unknown — private read authority pending
• Authentic media: Not accessed or processed

Outcome under review

Revalidate the completed planning baseline without inflating its meaning, establish the five-seat execution council and direct authorization, install a task-specific Product Council gate for all 58 issues, correct material source drift, and harden the delivery control plane before R0 execution advances.

Readiness-wave findings

Seat	Verdict before remediation	Principal vetoes
Product	Go for P0 governance only; no-go for live R0	Missing execution authority/QA seat; contradictory R4 conflict outcome; no live authority
UX	Allow host-independent UX-R0-001 preparation only after P0	Missing R0 state/a11y contract; contradictory Health vocabulary; frozen prototypes are not R0 evidence
Architecture	Conditional go for local/public controls and synthetic R0 preparation	No host authority; no architecture freeze; SQLCipher, recovery, coexistence and rollback unproved

Acceptance-wave findings

Seat	Verdict before remediation	Principal vetoes
Independent QA	Go for P0 remediation; hold R0 implementation/live entry	No QA charter/RACI; R4 drift; evidence prose/status hard-coding; unsafe sync; stale Wiki; no live authority
Project Manager	Conditional proceed for local/public governance	Source/authority drift; Project containment; control-surface gaps; owner-only dependencies

All five seats independently confirmed:

• 78 unique requirements, 71 active and seven deferred;
• 58 tasks, including 55 P0/R0–R9 and three R10;
• statuses 40 Backlog, 4 Next, 1 In progress, and 13 planning-only Done;
• no unexpected R10 dates;
• current code is planning/static prototype, not a working or deployed application; and
• the live deployment lane is Unknown — private read authority pending.

First acceptance attempt and remediation

The first exact candidate (f48b320e1a5f413e4602b577806cc66ca2bb27c6) received Product and independent-QA Go, an Architecture conditional Go, and a Design Hold; a final Project Manager seat was therefore not treated as acceptance. Design identified four publication blockers: residual R4 conflict-suggestion persistence, stale Timeline/rail/badge guidance, incomplete Health Status Card labels, and a machine gate that did not bind named Design approval, structured coverage, or all five individual seat verdicts.

The second candidate corrects those sources and adopts a non-self-referential approval registry. Every artifact review and seat attestation binds the same stable candidate revision and computed dossier digest; the validator proves that the published revision exists on fetched origin/main and contains the registered artifact bytes before any task can become Ready. Design applicability carries task-bound journey, state, and accessibility scenario coverage, while Architecture/Design not-applicable requires a task-specific rationale and named specialist concurrence. Private/release execution additionally requires a public-safe opaque authority evidence reference. These controls remain unexercised for execution because all 58 dossiers are intentionally draft/Hold.

Fresh acceptance on exact candidate

All five seats and independent QA reviewed exact candidate commit 1391bea9abcc899aefcad446324d7c0a2b0199c2 read-only. Their Go applies only to publishing the P0 control package; it is not a task-level dossier approval.

Seat	Final P0 publication verdict	Exact disposition
Product Manager	Go	Requirements, all 58 task Product artifacts, issue projection, R4, Health, Almanac and owner gates are publication-ready; no task implementation authorized
UI/UX Designer	Go	All four Design vetoes cleared; all Design artifacts remain Draft/Hold and no accessibility/runtime evidence is inferred
Technical Architect	Go	Approval model, generator, validator, workbook, Wiki and safe publication order are adequate for an all-Hold control package
Independent QA	Go	CI-equivalent controls, preservation, 598,245-byte dry run, workbook, Wiki, prefix and public-safety checks pass
Project Manager	Go	58 issues/items, six artifacts per task, dates/dependencies/statuses, delivery controls, rollback order and tracker parity pass

No owner input is required for public P0 publication or synchronization of the existing 58 delivery issues. P0-OA-001 remains required before any private-system read; P0-OA-002 remains required before a future non-delivery issue or workflow mutation. Later consent, credentials, provider/spend, recovery, UAT, R9 and R10 acts remain due only at their named human gates.

Candidate acceptance checklist

Gate	Required evidence	Current state
Five-seat governance	QA charter, charter/RACI, authorization, decision ledger, Owner Ledger	Pass; exact-candidate five-seat publication verdict recorded above
Per-task Definition of Ready	Six P0-prefixed task artifacts, central register, issue/Project projection, exact hash/published-revision/dossier-digest checks, named artifact reviews, five seat verdicts, structured Design coverage, council veto	Control structure passes; 348 artifacts intentionally remain draft and all 58 task records remain Incomplete/Hold
Source correction	R4 exact three outcomes; Health state/label reconciliation	Complete; validator pass
Authority truth	Historical records preserved; routine R0–R8 delegation and human-only acts explicit	Complete in local public-safe records; private lane remains unknown
Manifest integrity	78/71/7 and 58/55/3; valid graph; R10 blank	Pass; 40 Backlog / 4 Next / 1 In progress / 13 planning-only Done
QA ownership	Independent QA named for R0–R7 release evidence and R8/R9 integrated tasks	Complete in charter, RACI, dossiers, and Roadmap projection
GitHub safety	Five-signal verification; no issue reopen churn; targeted phase1 view hardening; workflows held if unreadable	Local dry-run pass: 598,245-byte parse, 58 complete bodies, six task artifacts, six artifact-review bindings, five seat records, structured Design assurance and 17 fields per task; no live mutation yet
Workbook	Seven sheets, all rows/formulas/URLs/R10 blanks/renders/hashes pass when projection changes	Pass; 20 rendered regions, zero formula errors, matching SHA-256 bf243b130813c775f6c18519b16146531d8365c4c1d9a03a52ddccc562938d21
Wiki	Commit-derived state; repeatable; cumulative history; no silent live-only/owned deletion	Pass against live Wiki snapshot: two byte-identical 455-page outputs from 1391bea9abcc899aefcad446324d7c0a2b0199c2; preserved-live-page and expected-refusal controls retained
Public safety	Prefix validation, secret/path/private-ID scan, semantic review	Pass: all 362 new files use P0 basenames; all 58 exact public issue projections reviewed; protected scan clean
Running log	Startup/council/correction append; prior-byte prefix unchanged	Pass; latest append preserves the prior 39,566-byte SHA-256 prefix
Independent re-review	All affected specialist vetoes cleared or explicitly held outside P0 scope	Pass; five seats and independent QA returned P0-publication Go on the exact candidate

Release disposition

Current: Go to publish this P0 control package through the existing feature branch, reviewed PR, successful checks, and merge to main. Live issue/Project/Wiki synchronization remains a distinct staged publication step and cannot be claimed until two quiescent parity checks and Wiki verification pass. Separately, every task remains Hold until its own task dossier passes; package acceptance cannot bulk-approve the 58 draft dossiers. R0 implementation, private-system work, deployment, authentic content, and production claims remain prohibited.

The anticipated next canonical work after a P0 pass is the R0 task-specific readiness wave: Product, UX, Architecture, QA, Delivery, and council review for the exact R0 tasks. Fictional, host-independent UX-R0-001 or safe synthetic SPK-R0-001 work may begin only after the owning task records executionAllowed=true. Neither host-specific architecture nor implementation/release acceptance may pass before executed R0 evidence exists.

Evidence boundary

This local candidate changes documentation, generated task dossiers/register/manifest projections, synchronization controls, and both workbook copies. It does not change live GitHub issues, Project fields/views/workflows, Wiki pages, application code/runtime, infrastructure, private systems, authentic content/media, deployment, or production state.