-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Docs Product Releases PRD R1 Manual Journal Archive
Canonical source:
docs/product/releases/PRD-R1-MANUAL-JOURNAL-ARCHIVE.md· Snapshot commit:b9df7479add1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Release | R1 — Manual Journal Archive |
| Document type | Product requirements document |
| Status | Council-reviewed planning baseline; not an implementation, deployment, or release-acceptance record |
| Accountable role | Product owner |
| Proposed start | 2026-08-31 |
| Proposed target | 2026-09-18 |
| Date confidence | Planning estimate only. Evidence gates, not dates, control entry and exit. |
| Evidence boundary | This document defines intended behavior. It does not establish implementation, testing, deployment, production use, or acceptance. |
- Governing product requirements
- Product Manager review
- Phase 1 release plan
- Phase 1 implementation plan
- UX specification
- Prototype v5 feature audit
- Prototype v5
Prototype v5 demonstrates interaction intent with in-memory samples. It is not persistence, privacy, recovery, or release evidence.
The owner needs the smallest trustworthy way to create and revisit an authentic memory without depending on an external integration. R1 is the first release allowed to create real memory content. It establishes explicit Journal Date semantics, source/derived separation, durable text-file preservation, duplicate choice, an image-first Calendar, and a readable Journal Day.
The intended outcome is independently useful: the owner can upload one or more UTF-8 text or Markdown files to an explicit date, preserve each original separately, and revisit that date after restart, backup, restore, and export validation.
Included requirement IDs (11): LID-SCP-002, LID-SCP-003, LID-UP-001, LID-UP-002, LID-UP-003, LID-REF-001, LID-REF-004, LID-REF-005, LID-REF-006, LID-OPS-011, LID-OPS-018.
Excluded requirement IDs (67): LID-SCP-001, LID-SCP-004, LID-TG-001, LID-TG-002, LID-TG-003, LID-TG-004, LID-TG-005, LID-TG-006, LID-TG-007, LID-TG-008, LID-TG-009, LID-TG-010, LID-VN-001, LID-VN-002, LID-VN-003, LID-VN-004, LID-VN-005, LID-VN-006, LID-VN-007, LID-UP-004, LID-SRC-001, LID-SRC-002, LID-SRC-003, LID-SRC-004, LID-REF-002, LID-REF-003, LID-REF-007, LID-AIT-001, LID-AIT-002, LID-AIT-003, LID-AIT-004, LID-AIT-005, LID-AIT-006, LID-AIT-007, LID-AIA-001, LID-AIA-002, LID-AIA-003, LID-AIA-004, LID-AIA-005, LID-AIA-006, LID-AIA-007, LID-AIA-008, LID-AIA-009, LID-AIA-010, LID-AIA-011, LID-OPS-001, LID-OPS-002, LID-OPS-003, LID-OPS-004, LID-OPS-005, LID-OPS-006, LID-OPS-007, LID-OPS-008, LID-OPS-009, LID-OPS-010, LID-OPS-012, LID-OPS-013, LID-OPS-014, LID-OPS-015, LID-OPS-016, LID-OPS-017, LID-DEF-001, LID-DEF-002, LID-DEF-003, LID-DEF-004, LID-DEF-005, LID-DEF-006.
Excluded means not newly owned by R1. The accepted R0 boundary remains an inherited regression gate, including LID-SCP-001, LID-OPS-001, LID-OPS-003, LID-OPS-004, LID-OPS-008, LID-OPS-014, LID-OPS-016, and LID-OPS-018.
- From a Journal Day, the owner uploads a valid text or Markdown file and the date is inherited from the selected day.
- From the global upload action, the owner must choose an explicit valid Journal Date before submission.
- A second file for the same day remains a separate source with its own filename, bytes, timestamp, and checksum.
- An exact duplicate presents a warning; dismissing creates nothing, while Add Anyway creates a distinct reference without overwriting either source.
- The owner moves between months, selects a populated Calendar date, and reads authentic source content with clear origin and timestamp labels.
- The owner repeats the flow on supported desktop and phone browsers using keyboard, touch, zoom, light/dark themes, and reduced motion.
- LID-SCP-002: Journal Dates are fixed to Asia/Kolkata; boundary fixtures around local midnight are unambiguous; Original Timestamp remains immutable; future Journal Dates are rejected.
- LID-SCP-003: Uploaded Journals are Source Items; future titles, summaries, tags, briefs, or artwork use separate derived records and cannot overwrite or masquerade as source content.
- LID-UP-001: global and day-specific entry points accept only UTF-8 .txt and .md files up to 1 MiB; invalid encoding, extension, size, missing date, or future date fails without partial data.
- LID-UP-002: every accepted file preserves its original bytes, filename, receipt timestamp, checksum, chosen Journal Date, and separate source identity through display, export fixture, and restore.
- LID-UP-003: duplicate detection is checksum based; dismissing the warning writes nothing; Add Anyway creates a distinct idempotent reference; concurrent submission never overwrites an existing source.
- LID-REF-001: the Calendar is Monday-first with en-IN dates, supports cross-month keyboard and touch navigation, and leaves dates without live sources visually empty.
- LID-REF-004: Journal Day shows authentic sources chronologically, labels origin and timestamps, preserves readable source content during optional derived-feature absence, and exposes available upload/status controls.
- LID-REF-005: warm light and deep-ink dark themes meet contrast targets; state never depends on motion; browser zoom and large text do not hide content or actions.
- LID-REF-006: core R1 flows work in the current two major versions of Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari plus current iOS Safari and Android Chrome, with semantic labels, visible focus, responsive layout, and keyboard access.
- LID-OPS-011: the new text-source, checksum, date, and index shape is included in encrypted backup and an executed restore with byte/checksum comparison.
- LID-OPS-018: restart and dependency failure do not silently lose an accepted upload; the archive states its best-effort single-host availability honestly.
- Accepted-file source bytes are byte-identical after ingestion, export fixture generation, backup, and restore.
- Date storage and display use one documented timezone contract with repeatable midnight-boundary tests.
- Submission is atomic: a rejected or interrupted upload leaves no partial source, checksum reference, calendar cell, or search/index residue.
- Personal HTML, API, file, and download responses inherit the R0 private, no-store boundary.
- No journal text or filename appears in logs, metrics, third-party analytics, or test reports.
- Theme, responsive, browser, keyboard, screen-reader, focus, contrast, zoom, and reduced-motion checks are release-blocking for the R1 surfaces.
R1 design covers empty and populated Calendar states, month navigation, date selection, full Journal Day, source chronology, origin/timestamp labeling, global and day-level upload, validation, upload progress, duplicate warning, Add Anyway, interrupted upload, restart recovery, and responsive/theme/accessibility variants.
The UX specification is normative. Prototype v5 is a starting interaction reference for Calendar, Journal Day, upload, themes, and responsive behavior; its sample data, in-memory mutation, and incomplete exceptional states must not be treated as accepted design or implementation.
- R0 has an evidence-backed proceed decision; its access, encryption, delivery, logging, health, backup, restore, coexistence, and rollback controls remain intact.
- Domain decisions define Journal Day, Source Item, Original Timestamp, Journal Date, uploaded-file identity, checksum duplicate semantics, and source/derived separation.
- Storage and transaction decisions cover original bytes, metadata, checksum uniqueness, explicit Add Anyway, interrupted uploads, migrations, indexes, backup manifests, and restores.
- Design review covers all R1 empty, loading, validation, duplicate, error, responsive, theme, and accessibility states.
- Authentic owner content is admitted only after R1 entry is explicitly authorized; synthetic fixtures remain the default for engineering and validation.
| Metric | R1 target | Evidence placeholder |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted capture fidelity | 100% of accepted fixtures preserve exact bytes, filename, checksum, date, timestamp, and source identity | Not yet provided |
| Rejection atomicity | 100% of invalid/interrupted fixtures leave no partial source or visible day | Not yet provided |
| Date correctness | 100% of timezone, midnight, explicit-date, and future-date fixtures produce the specified result | Not yet provided |
| Duplicate handling | Zero silent overwrite; each Add Anyway fixture creates one distinct reference | Not yet provided |
| Recall | Owner can reopen each accepted fixture from Calendar and Journal Day after restart | Not yet provided |
| Restore fidelity | 100% of selected R1 source bytes and relationships match after restore | Not yet provided |
| Accessibility/browser | No blocking issue across the required R1 browser and assistive-flow matrix | Not yet provided |
- R1 remains a one-user private archive with no share, public link, anonymous route, or second password store.
- Authentic files are application-encrypted at rest and delivered only through authenticated private, no-store responses.
- Source text, filenames, dates, checksums, and timestamps are personal data. They must not appear in logs, analytics, public caches, issue text, or evidence samples.
- Only owner-approved sanitized or synthetic fixtures may be retained in release evidence.
- R1 introduces no AI request and sends no journal content to a model provider.
Upload controls, date controls, validation, duplicate choice, Calendar navigation, date identity, source headings, and status messages must be keyboard operable and screen-reader named. The Calendar must expose date and populated/empty identity without relying on imagery. Both themes must meet WCAG 2.2 AA contrast targets; layout remains usable at zoom and on supported phone widths; reduced motion removes nonessential animation.
R1 introduces real-memory data shapes: Uploaded Journal source bytes, source metadata, checksums, explicit Journal Dates, Journal Day relationships, and any derived indexes needed for Calendar/detail. Exit requires an encrypted backup and executed restore that compares original bytes, metadata, checksums, dates, and display relationships.
Rollback must restore the prior application version without losing accepted R1 source truth. If the prior version cannot read the new schema safely, the release must provide a verified forward-compatible rollback path or a pre-change snapshot restore with a documented write freeze and reconciliation. A successful code rollback without data-shape evidence is insufficient.
- R0 exit criteria and proceed record exist.
- The owner has explicitly authorized the first authentic-memory release and approved any authentic acceptance fixture.
- Journal Date, Original Timestamp, source/derived, file preservation, duplicate, and transaction decisions are reviewable.
- R1 design and accessibility states have no unresolved critical ambiguity.
- Backup/restore and rollback plans name every R1 data shape.
- Every included requirement has executed requirement-level evidence or an explicit no-go.
- A single owner-approved text fixture completes upload, restart, Calendar/detail recall, encrypted backup, restore, and export/checksum validation.
- Invalid encoding, extension, size, missing/future date, duplicate dismissal, Add Anyway, concurrency, and interruption fixtures produce the specified atomic result.
- Supported-browser and accessibility checks have no unresolved release-blocking issue.
- No unresolved severity-1 or severity-2 defect remains, and the decision record says proceed, hold, or roll back.
- R0 privacy, access, encryption, backup, restore, or rollback evidence has regressed.
- An accepted file is changed, merged, overwritten, misdated, partially persisted, or not recoverable.
- A future or implicit global date is accepted.
- Authentic content appears in logs, analytics, public cache, screenshots, or uncontrolled evidence.
- Rollback cannot preserve or recover the R1 data shape.
- The owner has not authorized authentic-memory use.
- Blank browser composition, PDF, Word, OCR, or formats other than UTF-8 .txt and .md.
- Telegram photos, VoiceNotes, Monthly Almanac, Search, Corrections, redating, History, Trash, suppressions, or complete export.
- AI-generated text, Visual Briefs, or artwork.
- Sharing, reminders, coaching, social behavior, public access, native apps, offline-first behavior, or legacy-browser support.
- Object-store transition.
| Evidence | Expected artifact | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Requirement traceability | R1 requirement-to-scenario checklist | Not yet provided |
| Design review | Calendar, Journal Day, upload, duplicate, error, responsive, theme, and accessibility review | Not yet provided |
| Architecture decision | Domain, date, file identity, checksum, transaction, index, migration, and recovery records | Not yet provided |
| Functional test report | Valid, invalid, duplicate, concurrent, interrupted, restart, and recall results | Not yet provided |
| Privacy/security report | Storage, delivery, cache, log, and evidence-data review | Not yet provided |
| Accessibility/browser report | Required desktop/mobile browser and assistive-flow results | Not yet provided |
| Backup/restore report | R1 data-shape snapshot, restore, byte/checksum/date comparison, and elapsed time | Not yet provided |
| Rollback report | Application/schema rollback or snapshot-restore evidence | Not yet provided |
| Owner acceptance | First-memory walkthrough and proceed, hold, or rollback decision | Not yet provided |
This PRD, its links, prototype examples, and planned dates are not proof of a working archive. Only dated executed evidence can support later statements about implementation, testing, deployment, recovery, or acceptance.
Generated from arunpr614/Life-Reflection@6b8b70b72148 · Canonical content lives in Git · Fictional prototype data only
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host runbook
- Life in Days — Phase1 implementation plan
- PID R10 — Conditional Object-Store Transition
- PRD R0 — Shared-Host Private Foundation
- PRD R1 — Manual Journal Archive
- PRD R2 — Telegram Photo Capture
- PRD R3 — Retrieval and Date Integrity
- PRD R4 — Source History and Lifecycle Safety
- PRD R5 — Prospective VoiceNotes Sync
- PRD R6 — Generated Text Reflection
- PRD R7 — Generated Artwork
- PRD R8 — Operational Scale and Resilience
- PRD R9 — Private Launch Acceptance and Stabilization
- Life in Days release documents
- Life in Days Phase 1 — AI agent resource index
- Codex Goal prompt — Phase 1 P0 requirements to private production
- P0 Codex Gold Goal prompt — complete P0 and R0 only
- Phase 1 GitHub Project V2 sync
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Release Plan
- Life in Days — detailed implementation plan
- Life in Days Global PRD
- Life in Days — project tracker
- Life in Days — prototype completeness tracker
- Life in Days — requirements traceability
- Life in Days — UX specification
- Life in Days — AI Artwork Model Evaluation
- Life in Days — AI Text Model Evaluation
- Initial product brief
- Life in Days: Private Media Storage Evaluation
- Requirements under discovery
- Product and integration research
- Project Git provenance
- Life in Days — proposed shared understanding
- Life in Days — Product Council planning-baseline review
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Independent QA Lead charter
- Agent charter — Project Manager
- Agent charter — Senior Product Manager
- Agent charter — Technical Architect
- Agent charter — UI/UX Design Lead
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 Owner Action Ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution context digest
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution authorization addendum
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution council charter
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution decision ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 task Definition of Ready
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution-control review
- P0/R0 Stage 0 control-repair candidate review dossier
- P0/R0 Stage 0 delivery checklist
- P0/R0 Stage 0 rollback and recovery plan
- P0/R0 Stage 0 state contract
- P0/R0 Stage 0 test plan
- PC-001 readiness-control hardening — planning review
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Product Council Decision Record
- Life in Days Phase 1 — source baseline
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Product Council charter
- Life in Days — Product Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Project Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Product Council UX Design Review
- Life in Days Product Council
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days — unified Calendar and Almanac prototype v3
- Life in Days — Museum Margin Calendar prototype v4
- Life in Days — private Settings and compact privacy prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days — Calendar contract prototype v7
- Life in Days — Cross-month Almanac prototype v8
- Life in Days — First-use Readiness prototype v9
- Life in Days — Resilient Application Shell prototype v10
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days unified calendar prototype v3
- Life in Days Museum Margin prototype v4
- Life in Days Settings prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Calendar contract completion
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Cross-month Almanac
- Life in Days prototype v9 — First-use Readiness
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Resilient Application Shell
- v6 Product Council contract — Private Search State
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v9 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days v2 — design QA
- Life in Days unified prototype v3 — design QA
- Life in Days v4 — design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v6 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days v7 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days prototype v8 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v9 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v10 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v5 — PRD feature audit
- AI agent operating contract — keep Phase 1 alive
- Contributing to Life in Days
- GitHub Projects Roadmap — current capability research
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host deployment spike
- Wayfinder for Life in Days Phase 1 — adoption and GitHub integration report
- Life in Days — GitHub Projects Roadmap design spike
- ARCH-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R0-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R1-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R2-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R3-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R4-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R5-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R6-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R7-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R8-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R8-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R8-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R10-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R10-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R10-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — task technical plan
- AUD-001 — Product Council task readiness
- AUD-001 — task delivery checklist
- AUD-001 — task design specification
- AUD-001 — task product requirements
- AUD-001 — task QA plan
- AUD-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R0-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R1-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R3-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R5-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R6-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R7-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R7-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R6-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R7-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening Council record
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening delivery plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control evidence design specification
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening product requirements
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening QA plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening technical plan
- PID-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PID-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- PID-R10-001 — task design specification
- PID-R10-001 — task product requirements
- PID-R10-001 — task QA plan
- PID-R10-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R0-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R0-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R0-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R0-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R1-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R1-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R1-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R1-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R2-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R2-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R2-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R2-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R3-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R3-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R3-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R3-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R4-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R4-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R4-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R4-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R5-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R5-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R5-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R5-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R6-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R6-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R6-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R6-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R7-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R7-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R7-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R8-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R8-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R8-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R8-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R9-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R9-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R9-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R9-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R8-001 — task design specification
- QA-R8-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R8-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R8-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R9-001 — task design specification
- QA-R9-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R9-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R0-001 — task design specification
- REL-R0-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R0-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R0-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R1-001 — task design specification
- REL-R1-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R1-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R1-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R2-001 — task design specification
- REL-R2-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R2-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R2-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R3-001 — task design specification
- REL-R3-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R3-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R3-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R4-001 — task design specification
- REL-R4-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R4-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R4-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R5-001 — task design specification
- REL-R5-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R5-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R5-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R6-001 — task design specification
- REL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R7-001 — task design specification
- REL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R8-001 — task design specification
- REL-R8-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R8-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R8-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R9-001 — task design specification
- REL-R9-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R9-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R10-001 — task design specification
- REL-R10-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R10-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R10-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R0-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R0-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R0-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R0-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R5-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R5-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R5-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R0-001 — task design specification
- UX-R0-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R0-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R0-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R1-001 — task design specification
- UX-R1-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R1-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R1-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R2-001 — task design specification
- UX-R2-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R2-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R2-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R3-001 — task design specification
- UX-R3-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R3-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R3-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R4-001 — task design specification
- UX-R4-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R4-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R4-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R5-001 — task design specification
- UX-R5-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R5-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R6-001 — task design specification
- UX-R6-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R6-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R6-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R7-001 — task design specification
- UX-R7-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R7-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R7-001 — task technical plan
- Life in Days — document index
- Life in Days
- Life in Days - Running Log
- Publication provenance
- Pull-Request-Template
- Life in Days
- Security and privacy reporting