-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Docs Project Phase1 Github Project Sync
Canonical source:
docs/project/PHASE1-GITHUB-PROJECT-SYNC.md· Snapshot commit:758e55e2b66d
Status: live sync, saved views, UI configuration, artifact regeneration, and read-only reconciliation verified on 2026-08-14
Target: https://github.com/users/arunpr614/projects/1
Canonical source: PHASE1-ROADMAP-MANIFEST.json
Tool: sync_phase1_github.mjs
Use the manifest-driven script to create or update the 58 repository issues, add every issue to Project #1, and set ten Project fields. Keep dry-run as the default. Require an explicit --apply for mutations and use --project-only when the issues already exist.
The script creates or updates two saved views by exact name:
| View | Layout | API configuration |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Status | Board | GraphQL creates/updates layout, issue-only repository filter, and all visible planning fields; Status columns remain a UI setting |
| Phase 1 Roadmap | Roadmap | GraphQL creates/updates layout and issue-only repository filter; date fields and Milestone grouping remain UI settings |
The Status board requests these visible fields: Status, Milestone, Start date, Target date, Priority, Owner role, PRD / PID, Design artifact, Requirement IDs, Evidence, and Task summary. GraphQL's ProjectV2ViewConfigurationInput exposes visibleFieldIds, so those columns are synchronized on the board.
GitHub's current GraphQL view inputs do not expose board grouping or the roadmap's grouping and selected date fields. The live UI configuration therefore keeps Status as the board columns and uses Milestone, Start date, and Target date in the roadmap.
Live apply and independent read-only reconciliation on 2026-08-14 established:
- GitHub CLI 2.94.0 is installed and includes
gh projectfield/item commands. - The credential initially lacked Project access; it was subsequently refreshed outside this spike and now has
project. The smallest direct Project query succeeds. - Sanitized live metadata confirms Project #1 is linked to
arunpr614/Life-Reflectionand currently has 25 GraphQL-visible fields. All 11 fields needed by the board—including built-in Milestone—exist with the expected types and GraphQL node IDs. Status has exactly Backlog, Next, In progress, and Done. - The authorized apply created or synchronized 58 issue-backed Phase 1 items and 12 milestones; issue state is 45 open and 13 evidence-backed Done/closed. The eight pre-existing drafts and the planning pull request remain separate from the canonical task set.
- Every task matches its issue title, body, labels, milestone, state, Project item, and all ten Project field values. That is 580 field-value checks with zero mismatches; Status is exactly 40 Backlog, 4 Next, 1 In progress, and 13 Done. R10 has no milestone due date or task dates.
-
Phase 1 Status and Phase 1 Roadmap exist with the issue-only
repo:arunpr614/Life-Reflection is:issuefilter, so each view matches exactly 58 tasks. The board is grouped by Status and exposes all requested fields. The roadmap is grouped by Milestone and visibly uses Start date and Target date; its zoom is Month and no optional marker is configured. - The first saved-view attempt exposed a live compatibility failure: the published user-owned
POST /users/{user_id}/projectsV2/{project_number}/viewsroute returned 404 with API version2026-03-10. The idempotent recovery used the live GraphQL view mutations and succeeded without deleting or duplicating existing content. - Live GraphQL schema introspection shows
createProjectV2View,updateProjectV2View, anddeleteProjectV2View.CreateProjectV2ViewInputaccepts name, layout, project ID, and visible-field configuration.UpdateProjectV2ViewInputadditionally accepts a filter. Neither input exposes grouping or roadmap date-field selection. - The canonical manifest, public issue map, and both workbook copies were regenerated with the 58 live issue URLs. The map intentionally retains no private Project item, field, account, or view node IDs. This evidence validates planning synchronization only; it does not claim application implementation, Hetzner readiness, deployment, or release acceptance.
For read-only inspection only:
gh auth refresh -h github.com -s read:projectFor the actual sync:
gh auth refresh -h github.com -s projectproject is the smallest additional OAuth scope that covers both Project V2 queries and mutations; it subsumes the read-only Project access needed by the preflight. The existing repository authorization is still needed to create or update issues. This runbook assumes the GitHub CLI's current authenticated user token.
The current CLI credential now has project; the refresh commands above remain the minimum-scope recipe for another workstation or replacement credential.
Do not run both refresh commands. Use read:project for a read-only audit or project for an approved apply.
Query Project #1 without printing item content:
gh api graphql \
-f query='query($login:String!,$number:Int!){user(login:$login){projectV2(number:$number){id number title url}}}' \
-f login='arunpr614' \
-F number=1Equivalent current CLI discovery:
gh project view 1 --owner arunpr614 --format json
gh project field-list 1 --owner arunpr614 --limit 100 --format json
gh project item-list 1 --owner arunpr614 --limit 100 --format jsonThe script uses paginated GraphQL queries for fields and views so it does not rely on the 100-record CLI examples.
| Field | Type | Values/source |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Single select | Backlog, Next, In progress, Done |
| Start date | Date |
task.startDate; cleared for trigger-gated R10 |
| Target date | Date |
task.targetDate; cleared for trigger-gated R10 |
| Priority | Single select | High, Medium, Low |
| PRD / PID | Text | task.prdPidUrl |
| Design artifact | Text | newline-separated task.designArtifactUrls
|
| Requirement IDs | Text | comma-separated task.requirementIds, or Planning-only
|
| Evidence | Text | task.acceptanceEvidence |
| Owner role | Text | task.ownerRole |
| Task summary | Text | task.description |
The longest current Requirement IDs value is 901 characters; other generated text values are shorter. The script does not truncate any field value.
When a required field is absent, the script creates it. A same-name field with a different data type is a hard failure. For Status and Priority, required options are added and canonical case/color/description is reconciled; unrelated pre-existing options are retained to avoid silently clearing values on unrelated Project items.
The current CLI equivalent for adding one of the 58 issues is:
gh project item-add 1 \
--owner arunpr614 \
--url 'https://github.com/arunpr614/Life-Reflection/issues/ISSUE_NUMBER' \
--format jsonThe script uses the documented GraphQL mutation so it can use the issue's node ID directly:
gh api graphql \
-f query='mutation($projectId:ID!,$contentId:ID!){addProjectV2ItemById(input:{projectId:$projectId,contentId:$contentId}){item{id}}}' \
-f projectId='PROJECT_NODE_ID' \
-f contentId='ISSUE_NODE_ID'GitHub documents that adding content already present returns the existing Project item ID instead of making a duplicate. GitHub also requires adding an item and updating it to be separate API calls.
CLI field creation examples:
gh project field-create 1 --owner arunpr614 --name 'Status' --data-type SINGLE_SELECT --single-select-options 'Backlog,Next,In progress,Done' --format json
gh project field-create 1 --owner arunpr614 --name 'Start date' --data-type DATE --format json
gh project field-create 1 --owner arunpr614 --name 'Task summary' --data-type TEXT --format jsonCLI field-value equivalents after resolving the Project, item, field, and option node IDs:
gh project item-edit --project-id PROJECT_NODE_ID --id ITEM_NODE_ID --field-id STATUS_FIELD_NODE_ID --single-select-option-id STATUS_OPTION_ID
gh project item-edit --project-id PROJECT_NODE_ID --id ITEM_NODE_ID --field-id START_FIELD_NODE_ID --date '2026-08-17'
gh project item-edit --project-id PROJECT_NODE_ID --id ITEM_NODE_ID --field-id SUMMARY_FIELD_NODE_ID --text 'TASK_SUMMARY'
gh project item-edit --project-id PROJECT_NODE_ID --id ITEM_NODE_ID --field-id START_FIELD_NODE_ID --clearFor efficiency, the script batches all ten updateProjectV2ItemFieldValue or clearProjectV2ItemFieldValue operations for one item into one GraphQL mutation. It still performs the add mutation first, as required by GitHub.
gh project currently has no saved-view create/update subcommand. The script uses the createProjectV2View and updateProjectV2View mutations exposed by the live GraphQL schema.
Creation uses this shape; the Status board supplies all 11 field node IDs in visibleFieldIds, while the Roadmap omits configuration:
gh api graphql --input - <<'JSON'
{
"query": "mutation($input:CreateProjectV2ViewInput!){createProjectV2View(input:$input){projectV2View{id name layout}}}",
"variables": {
"input": {
"projectId": "PROJECT_NODE_ID",
"name": "Phase 1 Status",
"layout": "BOARD_LAYOUT",
"configuration": {
"visibleFieldIds": [
"STATUS_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"MILESTONE_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"START_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"TARGET_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"PRIORITY_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"OWNER_ROLE_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"PRD_PID_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"DESIGN_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"REQUIREMENTS_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"EVIDENCE_FIELD_NODE_ID",
"SUMMARY_FIELD_NODE_ID"
]
}
}
}
}
JSONCreateProjectV2ViewInput does not contain filter, so the script immediately follows creation with an update. The same update runs when a matching view already exists:
gh api graphql --input - <<'JSON'
{
"query": "mutation($input:UpdateProjectV2ViewInput!){updateProjectV2View(input:$input){projectV2View{id name layout filter}}}",
"variables": {
"input": {
"viewId": "VIEW_NODE_ID",
"name": "Phase 1 Status",
"layout": "BOARD_LAYOUT",
"filter": "repo:arunpr614/Life-Reflection is:issue",
"configuration": {
"visibleFieldIds": ["STATUS_FIELD_NODE_ID", "OTHER_VISIBLE_FIELD_NODE_IDS"]
}
}
}
}
JSONIdempotence is exact-name based:
- No match: create the view, then update its filter and configuration.
- One match: update its name, layout, filter, and board-visible fields in place.
- Multiple exact matches: stop without guessing which view to modify.
- A failure after create but before update is safe to rerun; the next run finds and updates the new view.
The live inputs expose no horizontal/vertical grouping, roadmap date-field selection, zoom, marker, or view-order properties. Those settings remain explicit UI completion steps; the script does not claim them as API-synchronized.
Safe local dry-run; no gh process is started and no files are written:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjsAfter approving GitHub mutations and refreshing the project scope, synchronize repository issues and Project #1:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --applyIf all 58 issues already exist and only Project #1 should change:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --project-onlyThat project-only command is the least expansive recovery path when repository issues already exist. It idempotently refreshes the 58 Project item fields, creates or updates the two saved views, and writes the issue map without rewriting repository issues or milestones. It was used successfully to recover from the initial saved-view endpoint failure.
Other guarded modes:
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --issues-only
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --project-only --skip-views
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --close-done--close-done is deliberately separate because Project Status and GitHub issue state are different mutations. Only use it when the 13 manifest Done tasks' named evidence has been reviewed.
- The operation is idempotent at the stable task-ID level and is safe to rerun after a partial failure.
- It does not delete issues, labels, milestones, Project items, Project fields, field options, or views.
- It preserves unrelated Project single-select options and unrelated views.
- It fails closed if the trigger-only R10 milestone acquires a due date. GitHub's milestone API rejects both
nulland an empty string as a clearing value, so clear that date in the GitHub UI before rerunning rather than silently retaining drift. - It is not transactional. A network/API failure can leave a prefix of tasks synchronized; rerun after resolving the error.
- Review the dry-run first. After an apply, rerun read-only Project queries and compare all 58 item values to the manifest before calling the roadmap synchronized.
- If an incorrect field value is written, correct the manifest and rerun. Removing a mistakenly added Project item or view is a separate destructive operation and is outside this script.
- Phase 1 Status uses Status as its columns and shows Backlog, Next, In progress, and Done.
- Phase 1 Roadmap groups rows by Milestone.
- Start date and Target date drive the roadmap bars.
- Month zoom is retained; no optional date marker is required for this baseline.
- Both views use the issue-only repository filter and display exactly 58 matching items.
- R10 dates remain blank until its measured threshold trigger is approved.
- GitHub, Using the API to manage Projects
- GitHub, OAuth scopes
- GitHub, REST API endpoints for Project views — published endpoint evaluated during the spike; the live user-owned POST returned 404, so the script does not use it
- GitHub CLI,
gh project - GitHub CLI,
gh project field-create - GitHub CLI,
gh project item-add - GitHub CLI,
gh project item-edit
Generated from arunpr614/Life-Reflection@6b8b70b72148 · Canonical content lives in Git · Fictional prototype data only
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host runbook
- Life in Days — Phase1 implementation plan
- PID R10 — Conditional Object-Store Transition
- PRD R0 — Shared-Host Private Foundation
- PRD R1 — Manual Journal Archive
- PRD R2 — Telegram Photo Capture
- PRD R3 — Retrieval and Date Integrity
- PRD R4 — Source History and Lifecycle Safety
- PRD R5 — Prospective VoiceNotes Sync
- PRD R6 — Generated Text Reflection
- PRD R7 — Generated Artwork
- PRD R8 — Operational Scale and Resilience
- PRD R9 — Private Launch Acceptance and Stabilization
- Life in Days release documents
- Life in Days Phase 1 — AI agent resource index
- Codex Goal prompt — Phase 1 P0 requirements to private production
- P0 Codex Gold Goal prompt — complete P0 and R0 only
- Phase 1 GitHub Project V2 sync
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Release Plan
- Life in Days — detailed implementation plan
- Life in Days Global PRD
- Life in Days — project tracker
- Life in Days — prototype completeness tracker
- Life in Days — requirements traceability
- Life in Days — UX specification
- Life in Days — AI Artwork Model Evaluation
- Life in Days — AI Text Model Evaluation
- Initial product brief
- Life in Days: Private Media Storage Evaluation
- Requirements under discovery
- Product and integration research
- Project Git provenance
- Life in Days — proposed shared understanding
- Life in Days — Product Council planning-baseline review
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Independent QA Lead charter
- Agent charter — Project Manager
- Agent charter — Senior Product Manager
- Agent charter — Technical Architect
- Agent charter — UI/UX Design Lead
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 Owner Action Ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution context digest
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution authorization addendum
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution council charter
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution decision ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 task Definition of Ready
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution-control review
- P0/R0 Stage 0 control-repair candidate review dossier
- P0/R0 Stage 0 delivery checklist
- P0/R0 Stage 0 rollback and recovery plan
- P0/R0 Stage 0 state contract
- P0/R0 Stage 0 test plan
- PC-001 readiness-control hardening — planning review
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Product Council Decision Record
- Life in Days Phase 1 — source baseline
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Product Council charter
- Life in Days — Product Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Project Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Product Council UX Design Review
- Life in Days Product Council
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days — unified Calendar and Almanac prototype v3
- Life in Days — Museum Margin Calendar prototype v4
- Life in Days — private Settings and compact privacy prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days — Calendar contract prototype v7
- Life in Days — Cross-month Almanac prototype v8
- Life in Days — First-use Readiness prototype v9
- Life in Days — Resilient Application Shell prototype v10
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days unified calendar prototype v3
- Life in Days Museum Margin prototype v4
- Life in Days Settings prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Calendar contract completion
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Cross-month Almanac
- Life in Days prototype v9 — First-use Readiness
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Resilient Application Shell
- v6 Product Council contract — Private Search State
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v9 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days v2 — design QA
- Life in Days unified prototype v3 — design QA
- Life in Days v4 — design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v6 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days v7 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days prototype v8 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v9 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v10 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v5 — PRD feature audit
- AI agent operating contract — keep Phase 1 alive
- Contributing to Life in Days
- GitHub Projects Roadmap — current capability research
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host deployment spike
- Wayfinder for Life in Days Phase 1 — adoption and GitHub integration report
- Life in Days — GitHub Projects Roadmap design spike
- ARCH-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R0-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R1-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R2-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R3-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R4-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R5-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R6-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R7-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R8-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R8-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R8-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R10-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R10-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R10-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — task technical plan
- AUD-001 — Product Council task readiness
- AUD-001 — task delivery checklist
- AUD-001 — task design specification
- AUD-001 — task product requirements
- AUD-001 — task QA plan
- AUD-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R0-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R1-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R3-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R5-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R6-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R7-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R7-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R6-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R7-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening Council record
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening delivery plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control evidence design specification
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening product requirements
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening QA plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening technical plan
- PID-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PID-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- PID-R10-001 — task design specification
- PID-R10-001 — task product requirements
- PID-R10-001 — task QA plan
- PID-R10-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R0-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R0-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R0-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R0-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R1-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R1-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R1-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R1-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R2-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R2-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R2-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R2-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R3-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R3-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R3-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R3-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R4-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R4-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R4-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R4-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R5-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R5-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R5-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R5-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R6-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R6-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R6-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R6-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R7-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R7-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R7-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R8-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R8-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R8-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R8-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R9-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R9-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R9-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R9-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R8-001 — task design specification
- QA-R8-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R8-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R8-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R9-001 — task design specification
- QA-R9-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R9-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R0-001 — task design specification
- REL-R0-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R0-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R0-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R1-001 — task design specification
- REL-R1-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R1-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R1-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R2-001 — task design specification
- REL-R2-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R2-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R2-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R3-001 — task design specification
- REL-R3-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R3-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R3-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R4-001 — task design specification
- REL-R4-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R4-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R4-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R5-001 — task design specification
- REL-R5-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R5-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R5-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R6-001 — task design specification
- REL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R7-001 — task design specification
- REL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R8-001 — task design specification
- REL-R8-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R8-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R8-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R9-001 — task design specification
- REL-R9-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R9-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R10-001 — task design specification
- REL-R10-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R10-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R10-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R0-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R0-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R0-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R0-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R5-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R5-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R5-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R0-001 — task design specification
- UX-R0-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R0-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R0-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R1-001 — task design specification
- UX-R1-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R1-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R1-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R2-001 — task design specification
- UX-R2-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R2-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R2-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R3-001 — task design specification
- UX-R3-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R3-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R3-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R4-001 — task design specification
- UX-R4-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R4-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R4-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R5-001 — task design specification
- UX-R5-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R5-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R6-001 — task design specification
- UX-R6-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R6-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R6-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R7-001 — task design specification
- UX-R7-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R7-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R7-001 — task technical plan
- Life in Days — document index
- Life in Days
- Life in Days - Running Log
- Publication provenance
- Pull-Request-Template
- Life in Days
- Security and privacy reporting