-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Project Running Log
Canonical source:
RUNNING_LOG.md· Snapshot commit:e8130729d005
Purpose: Append-only project journal. Each entry narrates progress since the previous entry for an AI-agent audience. Read top-to-bottom to reconstruct the project journey.
Rule: never edit or delete prior entries. Append new entries below with ## <date> headings. Corrections to earlier claims are made in the next entry, not by rewriting history.
Related docs:
docs/product/PRODUCT-REQUIREMENTS.mddocs/design/UX-SPECIFICATION.mddocs/audits/PROTOTYPE-V5-FEATURE-AUDIT.mddocs/project/PROJECT-TRACKER.mddocs/project/PROTOTYPE-COMPLETENESS-TRACKER.mddocs/INDEX.md
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: Arun's goal to address every v5 feature-audit gap through a repeating Product Manager, UI/UX Designer, Project Manager, implementation, independent QA, and incremented-version loop without waiting for further input.
There was no prior running-log entry. The starting baseline is v5 on branch prototype/calendar-ui-v5-settings at commit f74455f. The authoritative audit is docs/audits/PROTOTYPE-V5-FEATURE-AUDIT.md, which maps all 78 PRD requirements and identifies the prototype-representable gaps. The program must preserve the explicit distinction between simulated UI evidence and backend, integration, security, recovery, provider, or production evidence.
- Activated the persistent Codex goal for full audit closure; no smaller completion condition is accepted.
- Read the complete
prototypeskill and selected the UI branch because this work expands an existing interactive UI prototype. - Read the
codex-project-running-logskill and created this append-only project journal at the project root under the user's explicit autonomous-write authorization. - Started fresh specialist agents for senior product management, expert UI/UX design, and project management.
- Assigned the Project Manager to create
docs/project/PROTOTYPE-COMPLETENESS-TRACKER.mdwith feature packages, version numbers, gates, dependencies, evidence, and iteration ledger. - Assigned the Product Manager to map every representable gap into a dependency-aware roadmap and acceptance criteria.
- Assigned the Designer to specify the first proposed package: Search privacy and the complete deterministic lexical-search contract.
- All agents share this worktree. The Project Manager owns only the new completeness tracker during this iteration; Product and Design are read-only until their recommendations are reconciled by the primary agent.
- Existing v1-v5 prototype artifacts and user-owned design decisions must remain intact. Each accepted feature package receives a new version rather than modifying a prior version in place.
- V5 is a truthful, in-memory prototype and not implementation evidence.
- The audit's final coverage baseline is 9 Full, 38 Partial, 7 Placeholder, 12 Missing, and 12 Outside UI; 57 requirements need additional prototype representation.
- Search is the first safe, high-impact package because its query currently enters the URL and its required deterministic fields, filters, match explanations, history boundary, and exceptional states are incomplete.
Nothing deployed or published. The existing local v5 server is only a development preview.
Created:
-
RUNNING_LOG.md- append-only handoff journal for the autonomous completeness program.
- Reconcile the three specialist outputs into the authoritative tracker and version roadmap.
- Create the v6 versioned prototype files and branch for Search privacy/full lexical search.
- Implement all v6 Search states and interactions without changing v5 files.
- Run current-run desktop and compact browser checks, then spawn a fresh QA agent.
- Fix every QA finding, capture versioned evidence, update tracker/docs/log, and commit v6.
- Repeat the same loop for every remaining feature package until the audit has no unaddressed prototype gap.
No user decision is currently blocking autonomous progress. Product Council must resolve Timeline-versus-Almanac and visible Calendar status-label conflicts before the relevant version package; it has authority to recommend the least-divergent path while preserving explicit user decisions.
- The program is large; feature packages must remain independently reviewable and must not collapse many unverified flows into one version.
- Static CSS or screenshots alone cannot prove responsive/accessibility behavior. Every version needs direct interaction evidence proportional to its feature.
- Prototype completeness must not be described as backend, deployment, privacy, recovery, or production readiness.
- Read
docs/audits/PROTOTYPE-V5-FEATURE-AUDIT.mdanddocs/project/PROTOTYPE-COMPLETENESS-TRACKER.md. - Confirm the active branch and clean/dirty state before editing.
- Continue the currently in-progress version package; do not skip its independent QA gate.
- Append a new log entry at the end after each version is QA-complete; never rewrite this entry.
- Current phase / version: Completeness program setup; v5 audit is the baseline.
-
Active branch(es):
prototype/calendar-ui-v5-settings -
Working tree: Clean at program start;
RUNNING_LOG.mdnewly created after the snapshot. - Deployed/runtime state: No deployment. Existing local v5 preview may be running at port 4173 but is not production evidence.
- Next milestone: Council-approved v6 Search package and authoritative completeness tracker.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: completion of the first Product/Design/Project/Implementation/QA loop.
The three-role council decomposed the program into 30 stable packages from v6 through v35, with each of the 57 prototype-representable audit gaps assigned exactly once. V6 was narrowed from full lexical Search to the dependency-safe privacy correction; full Search remains v21 after History, Trash, and Suppressions.
- Recorded Product Council decisions C-01 through C-04 and the complete v6-v35 execution register in
docs/project/PROTOTYPE-COMPLETENESS-TRACKER.md. - Created the complete v6 version set without changing v5:
index-v6.html,app-v6.js,styles-v6.css,README-v6.md, council contract, handoff, current-run screenshots, and QA report. - Removed all Search-query parsing and serialization through
q; incoming legacyqis ignored and stripped into a known-safe history entry. - Kept Search input only in live JavaScript memory; reload clears it while internal navigation and Back/Forward preserve it within the open page.
- Replaced recent memories and suggested personal terms with a restrained, explicit current-scope explanation.
- Raised essential Search metadata, stacked the compact form, removed image-overlaid result provenance, and retained external accessible provenance where interpretation changes.
- Independent QA found one High issue: Enter from the Search field did not submit. The candidate gained a shared keyboard/form submission path and the same QA agent reran the full affected matrix.
- Final independent QA verdict: Pass with Critical 0, High 0, Medium 0, Low 0.
- Committed the immutable v6 implementation and evidence at
2c0fbf2.
-
npm run check:v6passed. -
git diff --checkpassed before freeze. - Fresh, result, no-result, Clear, legacy-query, Back/Forward, reload, URL/title/history/storage, focus, console, 1280/390/320, and inherited Calendar/Almanac/Settings checks passed.
-
design-qa-v6.mdrecords the independent test matrix and evidence boundary.
- An ordinary form-looking control cannot be assumed keyboard-complete; direct Enter verification belongs in every form acceptance walk.
- A narrow privacy correction can safely ship before its broader capability when the interface states the current scope and the tracker preserves the remaining requirement.
- Current-run visual evidence must use extensions matching actual encoded bytes; the browser captures were stored as JPEG files.
Nothing deployed or published. V6 is frozen as a local, fictional-data frontend prototype only.
Created:
docs/project/PROTOTYPE-COMPLETENESS-TRACKER.mddocs/prototypes/v6/COUNCIL-v6.mddocs/prototypes/CALENDAR-UI-PROTOTYPE-v6.mddesign-qa-v6.md- v6 prototype files and five current-run image captures
Updated:
docs/INDEX.mdprototypes/calendar-ui/package.jsonRUNNING_LOG.md
- Start v7
PVA-002 Calendar Contract Completionfrom frozen v6. - Reconcile the already-complete PM and Design contracts into a written v7 council decision.
- Implement the compact month/year chooser, external Today/selected/focus states, progressive attention/provenance disclosure, and Calendar keyboard/back behavior.
- Assign a fresh v7 QA agent, repair the same candidate until Pass, then freeze v7.
- Continue packages v8 through v35 under the same mandatory gates.
No owner decision blocks v7. Council C-01 already gives Arun's later image-only Calendar direction precedence over older overlay wording. The implementation council must choose the PM's twelve textual month buttons or the Designer's native controls; the PM's explicit acceptance contract is the default unless a compact usability conflict is demonstrated.
- Do not edit any v6 artifact.
- Branch from the v6 freeze record and copy the full version set to v7.
- Keep Search privacy in the regression suite.
- Append, never rewrite, the next log and tracker ledger entries.
- Current phase / version: v6 complete; v7 Product and Design gates ready for reconciliation.
-
Active branch:
prototype/calendar-ui-v6-private-searchat implementation commit2c0fbf2, with this append-only freeze record following. - Working tree: expected to contain only the freeze-record documentation until committed.
- Deployed/runtime state: no deployment; local prototype server only.
- Next milestone: v7 council approval and versioned implementation candidate.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: completion of the second Product/Design/Project/Implementation/QA loop.
Product, Design, and Project Management reconciled PVA-002 Calendar Contract Completion around Arun's approved image-only Calendar direction. Product Council retained clean cover pixels, chose an immediate-commit twelve-button month chooser, and defined distinct external Today, selection, and keyboard-focus states.
- Created the complete v7 version set without modifying any frozen v6 artifact:
index-v7.html,app-v7.js,styles-v7.css,README-v7.md, council contract, handoff, QA record, and eight current-run captures. - Added a private-content-free month/year chooser with exactly twelve
Jan–Decbuttons, draft-only year movement, safe immediate commit, explicit current/viewed semantics, focus trap/return, and honest four-digit prototype bounds. - Preserved image-only photo/artwork Calendar cells and real-photo cover precedence. Provenance, generated status, attention, and media failure remain outside pixels in safe accessible names and the Museum Margin.
- Added independent external dotted Today, solid selected, and dashed keyboard-focus perimeters with semantic
aria-current,aria-selected, and one roving tab stop. - Completed cross-month Arrow, Home/End, and Page Up/Down behavior; safe URL canonicalization; live month announcements; Back/Forward focus restoration; selected-day close behavior; and full Journal Day return behavior.
- Added ordinary empty-month and neutral media-failure fixtures, responsive drawer/sheet focus trapping, compact paper-day treatment, and tablet/mobile stacking above bottom navigation.
- Regressed the frozen v6 private Search contract, including legacy-query stripping, live-memory-only terms, generic title, Back preservation, and reload clearing.
- A read-only adversarial review found and drove repairs for history, focus, invalid URL state, compact stacking, deep-link, live-region, year-edge, and ring-geometry defects before the final QA pass.
- Independent QA passed the exact final hashes with Critical 0, High 0, Medium 0, and Low 0.
- Committed the immutable v7 implementation and evidence at
05975fc.
-
npm run check:v7passed. -
git diff --checkpassed before freeze. - Exact QA-bound SHA-256 prefixes: index
03cdafe8…, app90f2d2b8…, CSS0fe7faec…. - Month chooser, year edges, URL/title, history/focus, keyboard, clean-tile/progressive disclosure, real-cover precedence, paper/empty/failure states, light/dark, reduced motion, console, 1280/960/700/390/320, and v6 Search regression passed.
-
design-qa-v7.mdrecords the full independent test matrix and bounded evidence claims.
- A polished Calendar needs history and focus to be modeled together: selected-detail close, full-day return, and cross-month keyboard navigation each exposed different stale-state risks.
- A visual state can stay outside image pixels while remaining exact through layered boundaries, safe accessible names, and progressive detail disclosure.
- Responsive modal semantics require more than positioning; drawer stacking, background inertness, focus trapping, breakpoint focus preservation, and bottom-navigation z-order all need direct verification.
- Prototype representation limits must be named as such. The four-digit chooser boundary is not a product archive or retention limit.
Nothing deployed or published. V7 is frozen as a local, fictional-data frontend prototype only.
Created:
docs/prototypes/v7/COUNCIL-v7.mddocs/prototypes/CALENDAR-UI-PROTOTYPE-v7.mddesign-qa-v7.md- v7 prototype files and eight current-run PNG captures
Updated:
docs/project/PROTOTYPE-COMPLETENESS-TRACKER.mddocs/INDEX.mdprototypes/calendar-ui/package.jsonRUNNING_LOG.md
- Start v8
PVA-003 Cross-month Almanacfrom frozen v7. - Reconcile Product, Design, and Project contracts under approved Council decisions C-02 and C-03.
- Implement reverse-chronological cross-month groups, deterministic Load earlier, month/year jump, stable same-day navigation, and hidden/Trash-only exclusion.
- Assign a fresh v8 QA agent, repair the same candidate until Pass, and freeze v8.
- Continue packages v9 through v35 under the same mandatory gates.
No owner decision blocks v8. Council C-02 already adopts Monthly Almanac as the chronological Timeline experience, and C-03 preserves the approved Calendar/Almanac switcher.
- Do not edit any v7 artifact.
- Branch from the v7 freeze record and copy the complete version set to v8.
- Keep v6 Search privacy and v7 Calendar behavior in the regression suite.
- Append, never rewrite, the next log and tracker ledger entries.
- Current phase / version: v7 complete; v8 released for Product Council work.
-
Active branch:
prototype/calendar-ui-v7-calendar-contractat implementation/evidence commit05975fc, with this freeze record following. - Working tree: expected to contain only freeze-record documentation until committed.
- Deployed/runtime state: no deployment; local prototype server only.
- Next milestone: v8 Product/Design council and Cross-month Almanac candidate.
The Product Manager, UI/UX Designer, and Project Manager council approved PVA-003 Cross-month Almanac. The candidate now extends the approved Almanac across deterministic month boundaries without adding a Timeline tab. It is not frozen and has not yet received independent QA.
- Council resolved the initial range to August 2026 only. Each explicit
Load earlier daysadds exactly one calendar month: empty July, then June, then May. -
monthis the newest safe boundary and optionalthroughis the oldest; optionaldateanchors a chapter. Private text, scroll, and focus selectors never enter the URL. - The wide Almanac rail is now a collapsible cross-month index with safe month/day links rather than a duplicate mini-calendar. At 960 px and below it becomes a focus-trapped sheet.
- Chapters contain one Calendar Cover, generated title/summary/tags, counts, external provenance, and
Read full Journal Day. Raw source journals appear only in the canonical full-day renderer. - Real-photo cover precedence is preserved. AI/source/status/caption text remains outside image pixels.
- Hidden June 20 Trash-only and May 18 history-only synthetic records are represented outside the render data and never appear in ordinary Almanac counts, DOM, accessible names, index, or targets.
- Loading preserves existing content and the logical control. A local synthetic error keeps content intact and exposes Retry without duplicating months.
- Jump uses the inherited four-digit year row and exactly twelve text month buttons; committing resets the loaded range to that month, including truthful empty-month states.
-
npm run check:v8passes. -
git diff --checkpasses. - Direct browser walkthrough confirmed initial order; July zero-day load; June order 27/9; safe Back/Forward range restoration; canonical June full-day route and Back focus; twelve-button jump; empty July; failure/Retry; hidden sentinel absence; URL canonicalization; wide and 390 px layouts.
- Frozen v7 core file hashes still match commit
05975fcexactly.
This is fictional-data frontend evidence only. It does not establish backend query ordering/filtering, lifecycle enforcement, server pagination, persistence, authentication, media delivery, deployment, formal accessibility conformance, or production readiness.
- Assign a fresh independent v8 QA agent against the Council contract and exact candidate bytes.
- Repair every finding in the unfrozen v8 candidate and rerun affected/full checks.
- Capture final current-run evidence, record exact hashes, update tracker/QA/handoff, commit, and freeze only after Pass.
V8 independently passed with Critical 0, High 0, Medium 0, and Low 0. The allowed closure statement is limited to: LID-REF-002 prototype-represented; implementation unverified.
-
index-v8.html:0f876cf44f7f68478fa64653770ecd46bba9cd853bc6fcc3f3057e123a4ae384 -
app-v8.js:bc478af42d55df256fab8b2e9f0773d00b049a7879a12535a2a7effe11815760 -
styles-v8.css:453577e1b9c93ff63e215886b50215b8ad53a795dff5830afe47920711f19bda -
styles-v8-almanac.css:87ef6345aa6ef054d76354c5c27e901980f99478fc2802b62a8d51c8ae618007
Any byte change to those four artifacts invalidates the QA result.
- Replaced private scroll/focus browser-history payloads with an opaque
entryIdand in-memory snapshots. - Preserved exact Almanac context across Load Back/Forward, view switches, responsive remapping, rail Hide/Show, manual/device theme changes, and full-day adjacent navigation.
- Bounded ancient and distant route handling so no transition creates calendar-distance-proportional UI work.
- Restored focus for drawers, dialogs, upload completion, photo view, and artwork generation states.
- Corrected compact Read, Load, Retry, and archive-end controls to the 44 px minimum at 390 and 320 px.
- Full Council Sections 13 and 14 interaction matrix passed.
- 1280/960/700/390/320 layouts, no horizontal overflow, drawer behavior, reduced motion, 200% text zoom, and compact high-zoom observation passed within the documented v35 boundary.
- V6 private Search and frozen v7 Calendar regressions passed; v6/v7 files remained unchanged.
-
npm run check:v8andgit diff --checkpassed; tested routes produced no console warnings or errors. -
design-qa-v8.mdcontains the complete bounded QA record.
Nothing was deployed or published. V8 remains a local fictional-data frontend prototype and does not verify any backend, integration, persistence, authentication, accessibility-conformance, or production behavior.
Freeze v8 without changing the QA-bound bytes, release v9 PVA-004 First-use and Readiness, and keep every prior version immutable.
V9 independently passed with Critical 0, High 0, Medium 0, and Low 0. The implementation and evidence are immutable at ae34415; the freeze record is 5a12fb2; the final tracker record is 12e5e88.
- The default Calendar can now represent a calm empty first-use archive with five independent VoiceNotes, Telegram, AI, Backup, and Recovery Ceremony readiness lanes.
- Capture remains available when AI is unavailable. Backup remains distinct from restoration, and Recovery Ceremony remains Blocked in every v9 fixture with all three prerequisites unevidenced.
- A real local
.txtselection can create exactly one temporary Uploaded Journal without revealing the populated regression fixture or persisting any content. - Fixture choice and Search text remain page-memory-only. No hostname, callback path, identifier, credential, recovery key, or false connection/backup/restore claim appears.
- The allowed closure is limited to: First-use readiness is prototype-represented with synthetic fixtures; integrations, recovery, implementation, and operations remain unverified.
- Frozen v6–v8 behavior, responsive widths, compact reflow observations, light/dark, reduced motion, keyboard/focus, target size, URL/title/storage privacy, syntax, console, and current-run evidence passed.
- Nothing was deployed or published. V9 is a local fictional-data frontend prototype only.
- V10
PVA-005 Resilient Application Shellwas released from the queue after the freeze.
Product, Design, and Project Management approved PVA-005 Resilient Application Shell. After adversarial repair and complete fresh independent QA by /root/v10_independent_qa, v10 passed with Critical 0, High 0, Medium 0, and Low 0. The implementation/evidence commit is recorded by the following freeze entry; these are the immutable QA-bound UI identities:
-
index-v10.html:9a8a1da6fc00ff4f694cb00dba3f5784168ab1a9d45b16ca680c410d6d330428 -
app-v10.js:5e0876d7e5ce91040b7b921a1a1fe10746304ae85f39c66f001166e56b8793ca -
styles-v10.css:3f38acbe74ffdac691b5963a779b27d61f3f19e3f03775aabec626b74bb12869 -
styles-v10-almanac.css:7ca0b5ad77cef1e08681479cd1d79d9dd1dafb70e520d1e0ee04d15860b38b8b -
styles-v10-readiness.css:e2c07c35b05307ff682ed0ecb21ceb4e33fcb8b5a45f2cd227b23d86584cd42e -
styles-v10-resilience.css:d69e52e73bfb2f72c378fbed3b60e1268790cdc91c642dbae347be01b642201c
- Added coordinated initial loading, verified-month request/failure, partial-photo failure, persistent connection interruption, bounded unsaved Correction, session expiry/reauthentication, total/settled server failure, and explicit guarded Retry states.
- Operation identities coalesce rapid repeat activation and reject stale callbacks. Month history commits once, media never duplicates, Correction stays at zero until an explicit post-reconnect Retry and then exactly one, and server recovery resolves once.
- The unsaved Correction retains its draft and caret through saving/failure, guards Escape/Back/navigation/reload, and never enters URL, history payload, storage, requests, or logs.
- Session and unknown/total-failure states remove private archive DOM and inherited live/toast text. Synthetic reauthentication returns only to a generic Calendar and never imitates Cloudflare login or proves authentication.
- State priority prevents restored notices, connection failures, local failures, total server errors, and unsaved confirmation from exposing contradictory or competing primary actions.
- Responsive and accessibility repairs include compact recovery visibility, dialog/footer reflow, orientation focus reconciliation, 44 px compact primaries, dark-theme primary contrast, and the exact 700 px journal-title boundary.
- Seventeen current-run PNGs cover connection, loading, month/server/media failure, Retry phases, session/return, Correction/leave, compact and landscape states. Light/dark, reduced motion, reflow-equivalent zoom observations, semantics, keyboard/focus, privacy/network/storage, and frozen v6–v9 regressions passed.
The only permitted closure is: The resilient application shell is prototype-represented with synthetic fixtures; connectivity, server behavior, authentication, persistence, and idempotency enforcement remain unverified. Nothing was deployed or published. V11 PVA-006 Needs Date Review is the next queued milestone after the documentation-only freeze record.
The immutable v10 implementation/evidence commit is ffabe0d; the documentation-only freeze record is 497c98d. Neither freeze step changed the six independently passed UI hashes. V11 is released from the queue while all of its gates remain unstarted.
Created docs/project/AI-AGENT-RESOURCE-INDEX-2026-08-14-15-10-39-IST.md as a comprehensive, timestamped orientation snapshot for future AI agents.
- Added the authority order, privacy/evidence boundary, recommended boot sequence, GitHub repository and private-Project resources, Project field/view model, P0/R0–R10 milestones, and a complete 58-task navigation table.
- Indexed all 255 publication-candidate resources exactly once: 90 Markdown and 165 non-Markdown files, including 117 images.
- Reconciled all task rows to the canonical roadmap manifest and public issue map: 40 Backlog, 4 Next, 1 In progress, and 13 Done.
- Resolved all 620 local links in the new index and all repository-wide relative Markdown links and anchors.
- Added discovery links in
README.mdanddocs/INDEX.md.
The index is an orientation snapshot, not a product decision or implementation claim. Current source documents and live GitHub evidence remain authoritative, and status-sensitive facts must be refreshed after the filename timestamp.
Created docs/research/WAYFINDER-PHASE1-GITHUB-INTEGRATION-RESEARCH.md as a deep, source-grounded assessment of how the explicitly invoked Wayfinder skill could support Phase 1.
- Adopt Wayfinder conditionally as a release-scoped decision-readiness layer, not as a replacement for the 58-task roadmap or as an implementation engine.
- Begin with a maximum two-week R0 pilot only if charting exposes genuine unresolved decision fog.
- Preserve the roadmap manifest and governing product/design/architecture artifacts as authoritative.
- Before any live pilot, narrow the sync-owned delivery views and auto-add boundary to
label:phase1, keep decision issues out of Project #1, audit shared close/status workflows, and revalidate the exact 58-task projection. - Expand only through just-in-time maps for uncertainty-heavy R5–R7 decisions or trigger-activated R10.
The research inspected the installed skill, current project artifacts, live GitHub state read-only, the upstream skill source, and GitHub-owned capability documentation. No Wayfinder issues, labels, relationships, views, automation, or other live GitHub state were created or changed.
- All 152 local Markdown-link occurrences across the report and updated navigation files resolve.
- All 22 public external report links returned successfully; the private Project link was verified through authenticated read-only access.
- Whitespace and public-safety scans passed with no local paths, private Project node identifiers, credential-like strings, or task/session UUIDs in the changed files.
Created root-level AGENTS.md as the repository-wide operating contract for every AI agent that changes Phase 1 delivery state.
- Requires every accepted roadmap change to reconcile the governing evidence, editable manifest generator, generated JSON and Markdown plans, GitHub issues and Project when authorized, public issue map, seven-sheet Excel release plan, and running log in the same change.
- Defines the exact status/evidence policy, dry-run-first commands, least-expansive live-sync modes, workbook regeneration and visual/formula checks, read-only GitHub reconciliation, R10 date invariant, and definition of complete.
- Corrects the GitHub sync runbook's primary apply example and records the current open-first, evidence-link, live-verifier, issue-identity, workbook-coverage, and generated-date limitations with fail-closed compensating controls.
- Records the current broad-view and Project auto-workflow contamination hazard and prohibits unrelated or Wayfinder issue creation until the delivery boundary is hardened or isolated.
- Preserves explicit authorization, public-repository privacy, truthful implementation/deployment claims, and partial-failure recovery boundaries.
This change adds documentation and navigation only. It does not modify the roadmap manifest, GitHub issues, Project fields/views/workflows, Excel workbook, application code, infrastructure, or deployment state.
Created docs/project/CODEX-GOAL-PROMPT-P0-TO-PRODUCTION.md as a copy-ready Goal for a future Codex agent. The stored artifact is a template only: this documentation task did not activate the Goal or begin Phase 1 implementation.
- Defined P0 as the 71 launch-blocking PRD requirements delivered through P0/R0–R9, not only the completed two-task P0 planning milestone and not only roadmap tasks whose Priority field is High.
- Kept the canonical baseline at 58 tasks: 55 P0/R0–R9 work packages and three conditional R10 tasks. R10 remains date-free unless its measured trigger is approved.
- Preserved the seven deferred P3/P4 requirement IDs outside R0–R9.
- Required truthful production completion through R9 owner UAT, Recovery Ceremony, immutable seven-day observation, and final human proceed authority; the Goal cannot simulate those acts.
- Requires the new agent to remain in the current Phase 1 worktree, preserve existing unpublished commits, read the complete authority/context sequence, and refresh live facts before acting.
- Creates a five-seat execution council for Technical Architecture, Product Management, independent QA, UI/UX Design, and Project Management, with role charters, stable execution artifacts, vetoes, and wave-based scheduling when concurrency is limited.
- Delegates routine R0–R8 decisions to the council while retaining non-delegable owner actions and a consolidated public-safe Owner Action Ledger.
- Defines the R0–R9 implementation, evidence, deployment, recovery, rollback, and release loop, plus the early-hard-trigger versus normal post-R9 branches for R10.
- Makes the GitHub issues/Project roadmap, Markdown plan, issue map, seven-sheet Excel workbook, Wiki, and running log synchronized living projections under
AGENTS.md. - Requires Project workflow snapshots/rollback, repeatable remote-main-pinned Wiki publication, private deployment authority before any private infrastructure read/write, AI-blind authentic-media handling, and a private credential-incident ladder.
- Gives standing authorization for direct append-only use of the
codex-project-running-logskill at release events and at least every 45 minutes when material state changes.
- A cold-reader agent, an adversarial authorization/safety agent, and an independent document validator returned final GO verdicts with no remaining P0/P1/P2 findings after revisions.
- Validated 176 Markdown destinations across the prompt and navigation edits: 169 local and seven external, with zero missing local targets.
- Reconciled the manifest to 12 releases, 58 tasks, 55 P0/R0–R9 work packages, 71 active requirements, seven deferred requirements, and null R10 dates.
- Verified balanced Markdown fences, unique headings, final newline, no trailing whitespace, and syntax-clean roadmap, GitHub-sync, and Wiki generator scripts.
- The frozen v10 prototype syntax check passed from
prototypes/calendar-ui. An initial root-level npm invocation correctly exposed that the repository root has nopackage.json; validation was rerun from the actual prototype package. - The protected changed-content scan found no absolute local path, task/session identifier, private Project node identifier, credential-like value, or private-key marker.
Created:
docs/project/CODEX-GOAL-PROMPT-P0-TO-PRODUCTION.md
Updated:
README.mddocs/INDEX.mdRUNNING_LOG.md
No roadmap status, manifest task, GitHub issue, Project item/field/view/workflow, Excel workbook, Wiki page, application code, infrastructure, credential, deployment, or production state changed. The three documentation files and this append are local and awaiting the scoped local commit at this entry.
Validate the complete staged candidate and create the local documentation commit. The Product Owner may then copy the prompt's Goal section into a new Codex Goal when ready; no Goal was started by this task.
Resumed the now-active autonomous Goal after Arun's explicit pause/resume and assembled a local P0 execution-control candidate. The candidate installs a task-specific Product Council Definition of Ready before any engineering implementation can start. It does not approve implementation: all 58 task dossiers remain Incomplete, all 58 remain on Hold, and executionAllowed is false for every task.
- Added the execution Council charter, authorization record, decision log, context digest, owner-action ledger, QA seat, P0 control review, and task Definition of Ready under P0-prefixed filenames.
- Added canonical task-state, readiness-override, and artifact-register JSON controls.
- Generated six P0-prefixed draft artifacts for each of the 58 existing roadmap tasks: Product PRD, technical plan, design spec, QA plan, delivery checklist, and Council readiness decision. The 348 artifacts are drafts, not specialist approvals.
- Made generation non-destructive by default: existing specialist-authored content is preserved, draft replacement requires explicit
--refresh-drafts, and non-draft artifacts are never overwritten by refresh. - Added a fail-closed validator for task/artifact identity, paths, hashes, scenario coverage, Council verdicts, private-authority requirements, health states, R4 conflict outcomes, R10 date invariants, and authentic-media boundaries.
- Extended the GitHub dry-run projection so each existing issue carries its task-specific DoR table and six exact artifact links, while the Roadmap projection manages 17 task-bound fields. No live issue, Project, view, or workflow state has been changed yet.
- Standardized the three R4 conflict outcomes to keep the Correction, display the newest upstream revision, or create a new Correction based on both.
- Standardized durable health states to
unknown,never run,success,delayed,failed, andblocked;recovery verifiedremains evidence detail rather than a health state. - Reconciled the Monthly Almanac as the sole chronological browsing destination, retained the Calendar/Almanac switcher near Search, kept management under Settings/More, and removed any persistent Calendar status overlay requirement.
- Preserved the privacy contract: R0 remains synthetic-only, R1 is the first authentic-text gate with consent, and authentic photos or photo-derived data remain structurally excluded from AI.
- Regenerated
outputs/phase1/Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsxand the P0-prefixed review copy atoutputs/P0-review-20260814-2106/P0-Life-in-Days-Phase1-Release-Plan.xlsxfrom the same in-memory workbook. - The two workbooks are byte-identical with SHA-256
6630f1a50a4b657ed8a3f94e67160283c5f209e23be9a6c2417175239c37c708. - Verified seven sheets, 58 unique canonical issue URLs, 348 task artifact projections, 78 requirements, all seven explicit deferrals, three blank-date R10 tasks, zero execution-authorized tasks, zero formula errors, and a healthy XLSX archive.
- Visually reviewed 20 rendered regions covering every row of every worksheet. The task, readiness, release, traceability, risk, and trigger-only states are legible and consistent with the manifest.
All substantive changes in this entry are local to the Phase1 project folder. Read-only GitHub/Wiki inspection was used where needed. No GitHub issue, Project field, view, workflow, Wiki page, infrastructure, provider, credential, authentic memory, application runtime, deployment, or production state was mutated. Deployment remains exactly Unknown — private read authority pending.
No owner input is required to finish the local/public P0 control package or prepare the existing-issue projection. Before later gated work, the owner must provide private deployment authority, the approved workflow-capture attestation needed before non-delivery/workflow mutation, an approved secret-delivery mechanism, and the release-specific consent/authentication/provider/spend/UAT/recovery decisions named in the Owner Action Ledger. Secrets must not be posted in tickets, documents, or chat.
Prove deterministic Wiki generation against the current live Wiki snapshot, run the complete local control suite, obtain fresh Product, Architecture, Design, independent QA, and Delivery verdicts on this exact candidate, then publish through a reviewed branch/PR before any issue or Roadmap synchronization. R0 implementation remains prohibited until its own task-specific dossier reaches Council Ready.
Fresh UI/UX review held the first P0 candidate because R4 still retained conflict-suggestion language, Calendar/Almanac guidance still contained rail/badge/Timeline contradictions, the Health Status Card inventory omitted exact states, and the validator did not machine-enforce task-level Design or individual council approvals. The local candidate was corrected; it has not yet received final five-seat acceptance or been published.
- Replaced R4 conflict-suggestion persistence with the exact recorded three-choice model: keep the Correction, display the newest upstream revision, or create a new Correction based on both.
- Removed stale user-facing Timeline, persistent-navigation-rail, and Calendar overlay-badge instructions; standardized the public chronological surface and API contract on Monthly Almanac.
- Made the Health Status Card inventory enumerate
Unknown,Never verified,Healthy,Attention — delayed,Failed, andBlocked, withNot configuredseparate. - Added structured six-artifact reviews, exact candidate revision and dossier digest binding, five named council-seat verdicts, task-bound journey/state/accessibility scenario coverage, specialist-concurred Architecture/Design not-applicable handling, published-revision/blob verification, and an opaque private-authority evidence reference gate.
- Adopted a non-self-referential sequence: six stable artifacts form candidate commit C; external attestations bind C and its digest; a later registry commit records those attestations without modifying the six artifacts.
- Refreshed only the 348 artifacts still marked
draft. A subsequent default generator run preserved all 348, proving that non-draft protection and the normal create-missing path remain intact.
- The execution-control validator passes with 78 requirements, 71 active, seven deferred, 58 tasks, 348 draft artifacts, 58 Incomplete dossiers, zero Ready, zero execution-authorized, and blank R10 dates.
- The GitHub dry run parses at 598,245 bytes and contains 58 task markers, 58 named artifact-review tables, 58 five-seat records, 58 structured Design-assurance sections, and 58
Execution allowed: Noprojections. - The seven-sheet workbook was regenerated from the revised manifest. The P0 review copy and grandfathered canonical copy are byte-identical at SHA-256
bf243b130813c775f6c18519b16146531d8365c4c1d9a03a52ddccc562938d21; 58 issue URLs, zero Ready/allowed tasks, three blank-date R10 tasks, 20 rendered regions, and zero formula errors remain asserted.
All changes remain local to the Phase1 project folder. No GitHub issue, Project field/view/workflow, Wiki page, private system, provider, authentic content/media, deployment, or production state was changed. Deployment remains exactly Unknown — private read authority pending; every implementation task remains on Hold.
Freeze a new exact candidate, obtain fresh Product, Design, Architecture, independent QA, and Project Manager publication verdicts on that candidate, then use the reviewed PR sequence before any live issue, Roadmap, or Wiki synchronization.
Product Management, UI/UX Design, Technical Architecture, independent QA, and Project Management each returned Go for publishing exact candidate 1391bea9abcc899aefcad446324d7c0a2b0199c2 as the P0 control package only. The control review now records that five-seat result and permits the normal branch/PR/check/merge publication sequence. This acceptance does not approve any task: all 348 artifacts remain draft, all 58 dossiers remain Incomplete/Hold, and executionAllowed remains false for every task.
- Product confirmed 78 requirements, 71 active, the exact seven deferrals, all 58 task Product artifacts, exact R4 outcomes, Health/Almanac truth, and owner gates.
- Design confirmed all four prior vetoes cleared and the named exact-revision review, five-seat, structured journey/state/accessibility, and specialist-concurred not-applicable controls present.
- Architecture confirmed the non-self-referential candidate/registry model, dossier digest, published-commit/artifact-byte checks, generator preservation, workbook/Wiki repeatability, and private-authority reference gate.
- Independent QA reran CI-equivalent checks, generator preservation, the 598,245-byte GitHub dry run, workbook/Wiki checks, prefix validation, and protected public-safety scans.
- Project Management reconciled 58 tasks/issues/items, 348 artifacts, 93 dependency edges, status/date counts, workbook/running-log parity, mutation order, rollback, and two-pass quiescent verification.
Repository publication and live synchronization have not occurred at this entry. Live verification still has the expected 660 pre-sync differences; the two Project views still use the broad issue filter. No private system, workflow, authentic content/media, deployment, or production state was accessed or changed. No owner input is required for public P0 publication or synchronization of the existing 58 delivery issues.
Rerun the complete control suite after this attestation-only delta, commit and publish through a reviewed PR, prove a clean fetched remote-main checkout, then stage both views, issue/Project synchronization, two parity passes, and Wiki publication. Keep every task implementation blocked.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: Arun's explicit Resume after pausing at the post-merge, post-Project-field/view checkpoint.
Complete the already accepted P0 control-package publication without beginning implementation: verify the reviewed commit on remote main, synchronize only the existing 58 delivery issues, require two quiescent zero-drift checks, publish the cumulative Wiki from the exact merged source, and record public-safe evidence. Preserve the fail-closed state for every task and leave private-system work behind its named owner gate.
- Confirmed the clean publication worktree, fetched
origin/main, and remotemainall resolve to merge commitdbd497b496c0bfb982d67a61d6b93ab29d7c59ad; reviewed P0 heada3701d2d3e14d7c87b39f9c30a26a03d098292cfis its ancestor. PR #64 is merged with successful checks. - Verified the resumed pre-sync drift was exactly 62 items: 58 issue bodies, two issue titles, and the two corresponding Project titles. The already-applied Project field/view stage remained correct.
- Reviewed the issue-only dry run, then ran
node tools/sync_phase1_github.mjs --apply --issues-onlywithout--close-done. The operation updated 58 existing issue projections, created no issue, changed no issue state, and left the public issue map unchanged. - Confirmed issue state remains 45 open / 13 closed, every issue has five expected labels and six task-bound P0 dossier links, all 12 milestone assignments match, and only #22 and #24 changed from Timeline to Almanac.
- Confirmed Project status remains 40 Backlog / 4 Next / 1 In progress / 13 Done. Independent Project Management repeated all 986 managed field comparisons, view/grouping checks, readiness checks, and issue/milestone checks read-only and returned
Go. - Ran two live
--verifysnapshots with a 15-second quiescent interval. Both returnedpassed: true,mismatchCount: 0, and are byte-identical at SHA-2564f94bf15d12ef1bfbdb2eda1679ec1ae836d301af8ef74109e5c6e67c1c2ccfc. - Built the Wiki twice from merged source
dbd497b496c0bfb982d67a61d6b93ab29d7c59adand the complete prior Wiki clone. Both 455-page candidates were byte-identical, mapped all 449 Markdown sources exactly once, and found no live-only page to preserve. - Published Wiki commit
29562d6863eadc61ac8e2e2fcf3bece7f1ceffdbnormally onmaster, without force. A fresh clone verified the remote head, clean tree, 455 pages, Home, Documentation Index, Page Audit, and Page Audit SHA-25697277551604f8f837b855d42372c9628ce1d0fe8b935941d797488a2c540090b. - Updated the P0 execution-control review and GitHub Project sync runbook with the actual merge, staged mutation, parity, Wiki, failure/recovery, and evidence-boundary facts on branch
codex/p0-publication-evidence.
- The existing 58 delivery issues and two canonical Project views were the only live planning surfaces changed. No workflow, non-delivery issue, draft item, private system, credential, authentic content, application runtime, infrastructure, or deployment was touched.
- All 348 task artifacts remain Draft, all 58 dossiers remain Incomplete/Hold, and
executionAllowedremains false for every task. The historicalIn progressroadmap status forSPK-R0-001is not implementation authorization.
- The first Status-view apply attempt before the pause failed before mutation because seven target fields did not yet exist. Populating Project fields first with
--project-only --skip-views, then applying each view separately, was the safe recovery and should remain the standard order for a fresh Project. - Issue state and Project status are separate mutation planes. Omitting
--close-donepreserved the reviewed 45/13 split while still refreshing issue bodies, labels, milestones, and non-Done open state idempotently. - The generated Wiki index is
Documentation-Index.md, notPage-Index.md; an initial fresh-clone assertion used the wrong expected filename, failed without mutation, and passed after checking the generated file set. - A zero-mismatch verifier snapshot is useful but insufficient alone for a stability claim; two byte-identical snapshots after a quiescent interval, plus an independent Project Manager read, provide the bounded planning-parity evidence used here.
- Repository P0 control package: merged through PR #64 at
dbd497b496c0bfb982d67a61d6b93ab29d7c59ad. - GitHub planning projection: 58 existing issues, 58 issue-backed Project items, 17 managed fields per task, and both canonical saved views reconciled with zero verifier drift.
- Wiki: published on
masterat29562d6863eadc61ac8e2e2fcf3bece7f1ceffdbfrom merged sourcedbd497b496c0bfb982d67a61d6b93ab29d7c59ad. - No application, infrastructure, private integration, recovery process, or production release was deployed.
Updated:
-
docs/council/execution/releases/P0-P0-EXECUTION-CONTROL-REVIEW.md— changed the bounded P0 disposition from accepted/pending to published with exact live evidence. -
docs/project/PHASE1-GITHUB-PROJECT-SYNC.md— recorded the staged apply sequence, recovery, final counts, two-pass parity, and completed saved-view containment. -
RUNNING_LOG.md— appended this publication and reconciliation handoff without changing prior bytes.
- Complete independent Product, Project Management, and publication-safety review of the evidence-only diff, run the complete static-control suite, then publish the evidence branch through a second reviewed PR.
- After that evidence PR merges, regenerate and republish the Wiki once from the final merge commit so Page Audit points at final
main; verify the remote Wiki head and page set without making another repository edit. - Before any task can become Ready, harden the readiness control debts already identified: symmetric derived Artifact readiness, synthetic positive/negative execution fixtures, approval-registry current-checkout/merged-state checks, unique role-bound attestations, stronger private-authority evidence semantics, and generator protection for externally approved artifacts.
- Run the task-specific R0 Council readiness wave only after those gate controls pass. Do not implement
SPK-R0-001,ENG-R0-001, or another R0 task until its six artifacts and five seats approve one exact revision and the manifest recordsexecutionAllowed=true.
- No owner input is needed for the remaining public P0 evidence publication.
P0-OA-001is still required before any private-system read in the later R0 lane; credentials must use an approved private delivery mechanism and must not appear in issues, documents, logs, or chat. -
P0-OA-002remains required before any future non-delivery issue or Project workflow mutation. The current work deliberately did not cross that boundary.
- The first view apply should have been preceded by field-existence reconciliation; the failed pre-mutation attempt was harmless but avoidable. The runbook now records the corrected order.
- Parity JSON is retained only as sanitized temporary execution evidence; the canonical repository record stores its timestamp, size, hash, and result rather than the transient file itself.
- The Wiki will temporarily reference the first merged publication source until the evidence PR merges and the final one-way Wiki refresh completes. Do not call that final source alignment complete before the second Wiki verification.
- On
codex/p0-publication-evidence, inspect the specialist verdicts, rungit diff --check,node tools/P0-validate-execution-controls.mjs, the default GitHub dry run, the live read-only verifier, syntax checks, link/public-safety checks, and a deterministic Wiki build from the candidate commit. - Commit, push, open a draft PR, require the Phase 1 static controls to pass, mark ready, and merge with a merge commit.
- Fetch the final
origin/main, build the Wiki from that exact merge plus the complete current Wiki clone, publish normally without force, and verify fresh-clone Home/Documentation Index/Page Audit/source SHA. - Keep every implementation lane blocked while clearing the readiness-control debts and obtaining task-specific Council decisions.
- Current phase / version: P0 execution-control package published; live issue/Project parity and first Wiki publication verified; evidence-only reconciliation in progress.
-
Active branch:
codex/p0-publication-evidencefromdbd497b496c0bfb982d67a61d6b93ab29d7c59ad. - Working tree: Expected dirty only for the two evidence documents and this append until reviewed and committed.
- Deployed/runtime state: No application deployment. Deployment remains Unknown — private read authority pending. GitHub planning surfaces and Wiki only are published.
- Next milestone: Merge the evidence-only PR, align the Wiki to that final merge, then harden task readiness before any R0 implementation.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: independent Project Manager review of the 23:35 publication entry.
The 23:35 Cross-lane note said the existing 58 delivery issues and two canonical Project views were the only live planning surfaces changed. That sentence underreported the completed Project stage. The P0 live reconciliation also created or populated the required task-readiness fields across all 58 issue-backed Project items, producing 986 verified managed values: 17 fields for each task. No prior log text was rewritten; this entry corrects the record append-only.
The exact live mutation boundary was:
- the existing 58 delivery issue projections, with 45 open / 13 closed preserved;
- the 17 managed task fields across the existing 58 issue-backed Project items; and
- the filters/configuration of the two existing canonical Phase 1 views.
No Project workflow, issue state, non-delivery issue, private system, credential, authentic content, application runtime, infrastructure, or deployment was changed.
- Updated
AGENTS.mdto record that saved-view narrowing is complete while workflow containment remains unreadable/unapproved and therefore fail-closed. - Updated
docs/project/PROJECT-TRACKER.mdto record published P0 controls, reconciled planning surfaces, the evidence/readiness-hardening phase, and the continuing implementation Hold. - Updated
docs/INDEX.mdto distinguish the package-levelPublisheddisposition from all 58 task-level Holds. - Classified
docs/council/execution/P0-PHASE1-CONTEXT-DIGEST.mdexplicitly as the historical 19:51 pre-publication snapshot rather than current evidence.
- Current phase / version: P0 controls published; live issue, 17-field Project, saved-view, and first-Wiki reconciliation verified; evidence-only PR preparation continues.
-
Execution authority: 58 Incomplete/Hold, zero Ready, zero
executionAllowed; no implementation authorized. -
Next milestone: Obtain renewed independent GO on the reconciled diff, publish the evidence PR, then align the Wiki once to final
main.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: independent Product and publication-safety review of the evidence record.
- The 23:35 entry called
a3701d2d3e14d7c87b39f9c30a26a03d098292cfthe reviewed P0 head. Exact five-seat review binds candidate1391bea9abcc899aefcad446324d7c0a2b0199c2; PR #64 has no native GitHub review objects. PR #64 published sibling heada3701d2d3e14d7c87b39f9c30a26a03d098292cf. A tree comparison shows that the published head differs from the five-seat-reviewed candidate only inRUNNING_LOG.mdanddocs/council/execution/releases/P0-P0-EXECUTION-CONTROL-REVIEW.md, which carry the append-only log and final attestation record. The 348 task artifacts and other control bytes match the reviewed candidate. - References in the 23:35 entry to the “first Wiki publication” or “first-Wiki reconciliation” mean the P0 Wiki refresh. A prior 96-page Wiki already existed at
0e0b7276a9b0d907bdc0050ad4bbf6f14eab0ecf; the P0 refresh advanced it to the verified 455-page commit29562d6863eadc61ac8e2e2fcf3bece7f1ceffdb. - The two
mismatchCount: 0snapshots verify repository issues and GitHub Project state. Wiki publication is separate evidence established by the normal Wiki push and fresh-clone verification; it is not part of the issue/Project verifier. - PR #64 changed the repository static-controls CI workflow. The unchanged-workflow claim is limited to GitHub Project automation workflows/rules during live reconciliation, which were not mutated.
No prior log text was changed. The current package/task boundary remains unchanged: P0 package Published; 58 task dossiers Incomplete/Hold; zero Ready; zero executionAllowed; no implementation, private-system read, authentic-media processing, deployment, or production claim.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: the owner requirement that every implementation task have task-bound Product, Architecture, Design, QA, Delivery, and Council artifacts before work begins.
Use existing governance task PC-001 and issue #3 rather than creating a 59th task. Define a fail-closed readiness-control hardening slice, obtain Product Council approval on one exact six-artifact candidate, merge that planning packet through Gate A, and only then begin local/public control implementation on a separate branch and PR. Private-system reads, authentic content/media, R0 feature work, deployment, status churn, and Project workflow mutation remain outside this planning slice.
- Authored the six task-bound, P0-prefixed PC-001 planning artifacts covering Product, Technical Architecture, Design, QA, Delivery, and Council readiness. They remain
In review; the task remains Incomplete andexecutionAllowed=false. - Reconciled the plan to a single derived fail-closed evaluator; positive and one-gate-negative fixtures; candidate, approval-record, and exact-clean-main activation phases; stable role-bound reviewer identities and QA independence; structured owner-action/private-authority evidence; atomic protected draft refresh; value-only mapping across the existing 17 Project fields; rollback; privacy sentinels; and post-merge reconciliation.
- Rejected candidate
7d64fa1a54a37e056c1e0f9f34dba0c48cc0f4d1after Design found unmapped machine coverage, an obsolete artifact-state oracle, and an incomplete Project value mapping. A provisional digest built from filename keys was also discarded before approval. - Superseded the five-seat-approved R2 candidate
8bbd52d61f6955ad4a96a7d16a1a5e8e8c1ee37fafter two isolated workbook exports proved that packaging-only OOXML relationship IDs can differ without semantic drift. - Defined the corrected R3 artifact-specific determinism boundary: JSON/Markdown controls, sync payloads, and Wiki trees are byte-stable; canonical/review workbook copies from one export have equal hashes; isolated workbook builds must match all sheets, used cells, formulas, links, counts, R10 blanks, and 20 rendered ranges.
- Validated exact clean candidate
d44dbfbc8d040baddf46b7288476d4dc53c81e8cwith canonical dossier digestsha256:32deebe971b1321a7ccd4203d4c861d93c4ec3d45ba3bf4c9fab2ea048b9eaed. - Received fresh exact-candidate approvals from Product (
codex-agent:pc001-plan-product-r3-20260815), Design (codex-agent:pc001-plan-design-r3-20260815), Architecture (codex-agent:pc001-plan-architecture-r3-20260815), Independent QA (codex-agent:pc001-plan-qa-r3-20260815), and Project/Delivery (codex-agent:pc001-plan-project-r3-20260815). No planning-scope veto remains.
- Static validation passes with 78 requirements, 71 active, the exact seven deferred, 58 tasks, status distribution 40 Backlog / 4 Next / 1 In progress / 13 Done, 342 Draft artifacts, six In-review artifacts, 58 Incomplete tasks, zero Ready, and zero execution-authorized.
- Independent workbook visual QA separately remains Hold: long Requirement Map mappings are clipped, task-detail continuation renders are too small and lack repeated title/header context, and the Review Guide preview lacks its title. Planning approval accepts the repair/test contract, not the current workbook.
- Deployment remains
Unknown — private read authority pending; authentic-media access remains false.
- Commit the R3 five-seat review record and source projections without publishing the held workbook.
- Push a draft Gate A planning PR, pass repository controls, review, and merge the unchanged R3 artifact bytes.
- From exact merged
origin/main, implement the bounded local/public readiness controls and workbook render repairs on a separate Gate B branch. - Execute the complete
PC-001-CTL-P01,P02,N01..N07,R01,R02, andS01matrix, including independent visual QA. - Obtain fresh five-seat approval on the exact implementation candidate before merge, then reconcile issue #3, existing Project values, workbook, Wiki, append-only log, and two quiescent verifier snapshots.
No owner input is required for Gate A or the later local/public control-hardening implementation. P0-OA-001 still blocks every private-system read, and all later credential, provider, spend, deployment, recovery-material, or authentic-memory acts remain separately gated.
-
Active branch:
codex/p0-readiness-hardening-plan, three planning commits ahead oforigin/mainbefore the attestation commit. - Planning decision: exact R3 packet approved by all five seats; merge required before code.
- Workbook evidence: visual QA Hold; not accepted for publication evidence.
- Runtime/deployment: no application code, R0 feature, private read, authentic-media processing, infrastructure change, deployment, or release occurred.
Entry author: AI agent (Codex) · Triggered by: Arun's requirement that Product Council approve task-bound requirements and all Product, Architecture, Design, QA, Delivery, Council, issue, Roadmap, workbook, Wiki, and running-log evidence remain synchronized before implementation.
Complete the previously approved PC-001 Gate A planning packet, implement only the bounded local/public fail-closed control slice, obtain five fresh exact-candidate Gate B seats, publish through the audit-only registry and a normal merge, and reconcile only the existing 58 issue/Roadmap projections. Keep every delivery task on Hold and keep private-system reads, authentic media, R0 application work, credentials, deployment, release, and production outside the slice.
- Merged the five-seat-approved Gate A planning packet through PR #66 at
2fc31ec905f4c664b86bebdc511a87390a24a4e9before beginning implementation. - Implemented the bounded control slice as exact candidate
946a36e2e68796f4c7a0cd2156103fbd1416302d, a direct child of Gate A with 39 changed paths, five closed publication exclusions, and 34 exact task-file bindings: 27 implementation, six task artifacts, and one workbook evidence file. - Bound that candidate to task-files SHA-256
3272111f05758075cb5de0f42d05b94498d0c4eeca6f044e2d083fa7d2dcc448, task-contract SHA-256e53cc0fec7340946991c0e5e765b56bf548e74ac49bf80a76579ea25c6647730, canonical dossiersha256:1facc3894f745ab695d52d61fb034f6c7c42ae82cc810d0778095d4e28787dd6, and review context8efcd458442920dc0a9f050c691d677ec2c811e502dfb9555ae0c6c393a198b8. - Received fresh exact-candidate approvals with no vetoes from Product Management, UI/UX Design, Technical Architecture, independent QA, and Project Management. Each seat approved only normal merge and local/public control reconciliation; none approved task execution.
- Published the attestations in audit-only registry commit
6bf7da157220f59cb0fab6e07d0bf783e8b4265b. The registry keepstaskApprovals.PC-001absent andexecutionAllowed=false, so the control review cannot be used as a delivery-task approval. - Merged PR #67 normally at
0694e7ad548d15132171d7c910ce35d8bc05a4bc, preserving the exact candidate and later registry commits in history. Required repository checks passed. - Ran the exact-main existing-only GitHub reconciliation. Canonical delta digest
sha256:2b34c39c849ced1b92c79d77762fc000ab66ed1884f93592ed4b1a52a36f648ecovered 58 issue-body changes and 174 Project-value changes only. The operation created nothing, changed no issue state/status/label/milestone, changed no field/view/workflow definition, and did not rewrite the public issue map. - Confirmed built-in post-apply parity, then ran two separate quiescent read-only verifier snapshots. Both bind merged source
0694e7ad548d15132171d7c910ce35d8bc05a4bc, returnpassed: truewith zero mismatches, and are byte-identical at SHA-2562e3cc06bac969760809a12e4aef28d1e3fcb082207139fc5efa0c12b77bbe710. - Built the Wiki twice from exact merged source plus a complete prior Wiki clone. The 456-file trees were byte-identical. Published Wiki commit
25f438faa2adc57d42f62ef139a9f615de57af99normally, then cloned it afresh and proved a clean exact match, 450/450 Markdown-source mappings, zero live-only pages, and Page Audit SHA-256e0799bf18967e9c264547f729de4daf6e8a84d7ca8582d24a9ad0a1304b8a8b7.
- Readiness fixtures passed 341/341; audit-control history fixtures 35/35; exact-start verifier self-tests 62/62; GitHub sync tests 48/48; generated tracking covered all 352 canonical paths; the structural validator passed the exact all-Hold baseline.
- The default generators were run twice with zero second-pass drift, and two GitHub dry runs were byte-identical at 832,529 bytes and SHA-256
eeceaf5170f36a23c573fd807dc7cd279aebc49855a7a86a194e125e92162ba6. - The r14 review workbook and grandfathered canonical copy remain byte-identical at SHA-256
d8b21f955366a516bca0b0961b941b3f76c84b5aa2e9406e3740005ca7547994; Review Guide binds raw manifest SHA-25665060d958a3ac35e312112b180ffc2b7543f63dd02e1d346574c6804f0b64942. - Independent workbook QA checked all 20 renders plus archive structure and semantics: seven sheets, 58 unique tasks and issue URLs, 78 requirements, 2,009 formulas with zero errors, exact blank R10 dates/no bars, and no clipping, corruption, unsafe package part, external relationship, or sensitive/private content.
- The roadmap remains 40 Backlog / 4 Next / 1 In progress / 13 Done, with 45 issues open / 13 closed.
SPK-R0-001retains a historical In-progress roadmap label but has no execution authority. - All 58 task dossiers remain Incomplete/Hold. Artifact state remains 342 Draft plus six PC-001 artifacts In review. Zero tasks are Ready and zero have
executionAllowed=true. - No private system or authentic media was accessed. No credential, provider, spend, Project workflow, deployment, recovery, release, production, or R0 application action occurred. Deployment remains Unknown — private read authority pending.
- No owner input is required to publish this public-safe evidence-only reconciliation.
P0-OA-001remains required before any later private-system read; every later human-only action remains separately gated.
-
README.md— concise repository status for the completed bounded PC-001 control slice and continuing all-task Hold. -
docs/INDEX.md— current PC-001 Gate B/Gate C status, exact review/publication/parity/Wiki evidence, and audit-only registry role. -
docs/project/PROJECT-TRACKER.md— completed control-slice checkpoint and the still-held task-specific R0 boundary. -
docs/project/PHASE1-GITHUB-PROJECT-SYNC.md— exact PR #67 apply delta, two verifier reports, Wiki proof, and bounded claim. -
RUNNING_LOG.md— this append-only handoff; every prior byte remains unchanged.
- Review this evidence-only diff independently, run the proportionate static/document controls, and merge it through a normal PR without changing the reviewed control candidate, six PC-001 artifacts, manifest, or r14 workbook.
- Rebuild and republish the Wiki once from that final evidence merge so Page Audit points at final
main; verify a fresh clone without creating another repository edit. - Re-run final read-only issue/Project parity from final exact main. Keep all task execution blocked.
- Begin a task-specific R0 Council readiness wave only after selecting one decomposed task action, refreshing its six artifacts, and obtaining fresh exact-candidate five-seat approval plus any due owner evidence.
-
Repository main before this evidence-only branch:
0694e7ad548d15132171d7c910ce35d8bc05a4bcfrom PR #67. -
Wiki:
25f438faa2adc57d42f62ef139a9f615de57af99, exact deterministic build from that repository merge. - Planning surfaces: 58 existing issues and issue-backed Project items, zero verifier mismatches, no definition/workflow mutation.
-
Execution authority: 58 Incomplete/Hold, zero Ready, zero
executionAllowed; R0/private/authentic/deployment/release lanes remain blocked.
Generated from arunpr614/Life-Reflection@6b8b70b72148 · Canonical content lives in Git · Fictional prototype data only
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host runbook
- Life in Days — Phase1 implementation plan
- PID R10 — Conditional Object-Store Transition
- PRD R0 — Shared-Host Private Foundation
- PRD R1 — Manual Journal Archive
- PRD R2 — Telegram Photo Capture
- PRD R3 — Retrieval and Date Integrity
- PRD R4 — Source History and Lifecycle Safety
- PRD R5 — Prospective VoiceNotes Sync
- PRD R6 — Generated Text Reflection
- PRD R7 — Generated Artwork
- PRD R8 — Operational Scale and Resilience
- PRD R9 — Private Launch Acceptance and Stabilization
- Life in Days release documents
- Life in Days Phase 1 — AI agent resource index
- Codex Goal prompt — Phase 1 P0 requirements to private production
- P0 Codex Gold Goal prompt — complete P0 and R0 only
- Phase 1 GitHub Project V2 sync
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Release Plan
- Life in Days — detailed implementation plan
- Life in Days Global PRD
- Life in Days — project tracker
- Life in Days — prototype completeness tracker
- Life in Days — requirements traceability
- Life in Days — UX specification
- Life in Days — AI Artwork Model Evaluation
- Life in Days — AI Text Model Evaluation
- Initial product brief
- Life in Days: Private Media Storage Evaluation
- Requirements under discovery
- Product and integration research
- Project Git provenance
- Life in Days — proposed shared understanding
- Life in Days — Product Council planning-baseline review
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Independent QA Lead charter
- Agent charter — Project Manager
- Agent charter — Senior Product Manager
- Agent charter — Technical Architect
- Agent charter — UI/UX Design Lead
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 Owner Action Ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution context digest
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution authorization addendum
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution council charter
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution decision ledger
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 task Definition of Ready
- Life in Days Phase 1 — P0 execution-control review
- P0/R0 Stage 0 control-repair candidate review dossier
- P0/R0 Stage 0 delivery checklist
- P0/R0 Stage 0 rollback and recovery plan
- P0/R0 Stage 0 state contract
- P0/R0 Stage 0 test plan
- PC-001 readiness-control hardening — planning review
- Life in Days — Phase 1 Product Council Decision Record
- Life in Days Phase 1 — source baseline
- Life in Days Phase 1 — Product Council charter
- Life in Days — Product Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Project Manager Council Review
- Life in Days — Product Council UX Design Review
- Life in Days Product Council
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days — calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days — unified Calendar and Almanac prototype v3
- Life in Days — Museum Margin Calendar prototype v4
- Life in Days — private Settings and compact privacy prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days — Calendar contract prototype v7
- Life in Days — Cross-month Almanac prototype v8
- Life in Days — First-use Readiness prototype v9
- Life in Days — Resilient Application Shell prototype v10
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype
- Life in Days calendar UI prototype v2
- Life in Days unified calendar prototype v3
- Life in Days Museum Margin prototype v4
- Life in Days Settings prototype v5
- Life in Days — private Search prototype v6
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Calendar contract completion
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Cross-month Almanac
- Life in Days prototype v9 — First-use Readiness
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Resilient Application Shell
- v6 Product Council contract — Private Search State
- Life in Days prototype v7 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v8 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v9 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days prototype v10 — Product Council contract
- Life in Days v2 — design QA
- Life in Days unified prototype v3 — design QA
- Life in Days v4 — design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v5 design QA
- Life in Days v6 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days v7 — independent design and interaction QA
- Life in Days prototype v8 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v9 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v10 — independent design QA
- Life in Days prototype v5 — PRD feature audit
- AI agent operating contract — keep Phase 1 alive
- Contributing to Life in Days
- GitHub Projects Roadmap — current capability research
- Life in Days — Hetzner shared-host deployment spike
- Wayfinder for Life in Days Phase 1 — adoption and GitHub integration report
- Life in Days — GitHub Projects Roadmap design spike
- ARCH-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R0-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R1-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R2-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R3-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R4-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R5-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R6-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R7-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R7-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R8-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R8-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R8-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R8-001 — task technical plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ARCH-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- ARCH-R10-001 — task design specification
- ARCH-R10-001 — task product requirements
- ARCH-R10-001 — task QA plan
- ARCH-R10-001 — task technical plan
- AUD-001 — Product Council task readiness
- AUD-001 — task delivery checklist
- AUD-001 — task design specification
- AUD-001 — task product requirements
- AUD-001 — task QA plan
- AUD-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R0-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R0-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R0-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R0-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R1-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R1-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R1-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R1-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R2-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R2-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R2-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R2-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R2-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R2-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R3-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R3-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R3-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R3-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R4-002 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R4-002 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R4-002 — task design specification
- ENG-R4-002 — task product requirements
- ENG-R4-002 — task QA plan
- ENG-R4-002 — task technical plan
- ENG-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R5-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R5-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R5-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R5-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R6-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R6-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R6-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R6-001 — task technical plan
- ENG-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- ENG-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- ENG-R7-001 — task design specification
- ENG-R7-001 — task product requirements
- ENG-R7-001 — task QA plan
- ENG-R7-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R6-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- EVAL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- EVAL-R7-001 — task design specification
- EVAL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- EVAL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- EVAL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening Council record
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening delivery plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control evidence design specification
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening product requirements
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening QA plan
- PC-001 — readiness-control hardening technical plan
- PID-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PID-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- PID-R10-001 — task design specification
- PID-R10-001 — task product requirements
- PID-R10-001 — task QA plan
- PID-R10-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R0-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R0-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R0-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R0-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R1-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R1-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R1-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R1-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R2-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R2-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R2-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R2-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R3-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R3-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R3-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R3-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R4-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R4-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R4-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R4-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R5-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R5-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R5-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R5-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R6-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R6-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R6-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R6-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R7-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R7-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R7-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R7-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R8-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R8-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R8-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R8-001 — task technical plan
- PRD-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- PRD-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- PRD-R9-001 — task design specification
- PRD-R9-001 — task product requirements
- PRD-R9-001 — task QA plan
- PRD-R9-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R8-001 — task design specification
- QA-R8-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R8-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R8-001 — task technical plan
- QA-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- QA-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- QA-R9-001 — task design specification
- QA-R9-001 — task product requirements
- QA-R9-001 — task QA plan
- QA-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R0-001 — task design specification
- REL-R0-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R0-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R0-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R1-001 — task design specification
- REL-R1-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R1-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R1-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R2-001 — task design specification
- REL-R2-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R2-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R2-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R3-001 — task design specification
- REL-R3-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R3-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R3-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R4-001 — task design specification
- REL-R4-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R4-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R4-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R5-001 — task design specification
- REL-R5-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R5-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R5-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R6-001 — task design specification
- REL-R6-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R6-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R6-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R7-001 — task design specification
- REL-R7-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R7-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R7-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R8-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R8-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R8-001 — task design specification
- REL-R8-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R8-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R8-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R9-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R9-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R9-001 — task design specification
- REL-R9-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R9-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R9-001 — task technical plan
- REL-R10-001 — Product Council task readiness
- REL-R10-001 — task delivery checklist
- REL-R10-001 — task design specification
- REL-R10-001 — task product requirements
- REL-R10-001 — task QA plan
- REL-R10-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R0-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R0-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R0-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R0-001 — task technical plan
- SPK-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- SPK-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- SPK-R5-001 — task design specification
- SPK-R5-001 — task product requirements
- SPK-R5-001 — task QA plan
- SPK-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R0-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R0-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R0-001 — task design specification
- UX-R0-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R0-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R0-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R1-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R1-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R1-001 — task design specification
- UX-R1-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R1-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R1-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R2-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R2-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R2-001 — task design specification
- UX-R2-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R2-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R2-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R3-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R3-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R3-001 — task design specification
- UX-R3-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R3-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R3-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R4-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R4-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R4-001 — task design specification
- UX-R4-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R4-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R4-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R5-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R5-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R5-001 — task design specification
- UX-R5-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R5-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R5-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R6-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R6-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R6-001 — task design specification
- UX-R6-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R6-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R6-001 — task technical plan
- UX-R7-001 — Product Council task readiness
- UX-R7-001 — task delivery checklist
- UX-R7-001 — task design specification
- UX-R7-001 — task product requirements
- UX-R7-001 — task QA plan
- UX-R7-001 — task technical plan
- Life in Days — document index
- Life in Days
- Life in Days - Running Log
- Publication provenance
- Pull-Request-Template
- Life in Days
- Security and privacy reporting