feat(brand): evig repairs becomes evig technicians, and evig stops asking for printers

[catomean]

Three changes from the same focusing pass. Each is a case where the copy described an organisation the code had already outgrown.

The division is named after the person, not the service

evig repairs → evig technicians. "Repairs" names what happens; a user is looking for someone who will do it. The surface has worked that way for a long time — post a request, receive offers from technicians nearby, choose one, with a budget filter that already splits "Gratis / Community" from "Mit Budget". Only the naming lagged behind the product.

The rename is two lines in src/config/divisions.ts plus the divisions.items.<id> key in eight locales — the wordmark is composed (${ORG.name} ${id}) and every consumer derives from the array, so no component changed.

IT-Hilfe stops promising charity

The page called itself "Kostenlose Community-Reparatur" and said kostenlos three times over: meta title, meta description, subtitle, tagline. That framing does two bad things at once — it hides the marketplace the code implements, and it forecloses the half of the model where a technician actually earns.

Rewritten to what it is: describe the problem, get offers, choose. "Über die Community gratis oder fair bezahlt" keeps the free path visible without making it the whole promise.

Found and fixed alongside: itHelp.hub.subtitle was stored as literal English in es, fr, it, ja and ko. Not a missing key — a wrong value, so no fallback could catch it and no missing-key audit could see it. Five locales rendered an English sentence in the middle of a translated page.

No more printers

The donation pages solicited "Laptops, Desktop-PCs, Monitore, Tastaturen, Mäuse, Drucker" while the new homepage copy says evig does not deal in printers. One of the two had to go.

A printer is the archetype of what evig deliberately does not take: low value, hard to refurbish, and — per co2-impact.ts, which already refuses to publish a factor for the category — without a defensible open number, so we could not even honestly claim a saving for keeping one alive. GPUs take their place in the list, which is what the AI thesis actually needs.

The erfassung category '60' (Drucker & Scanner) deliberately stays. Existing inventory rows point at it, and deleting a category that historical records reference would corrupt them. Not soliciting new ones is the change; rewriting the past is not.

/revamped deleted

294 lines selling "die REVAMPED-Zertifizierung … unser exklusives REVAMPED-Label" — the previous organisation's name, as a product label, after the rebrand. It was orphaned from nav and footer but still listed in the sitemap, so it was indexable. It also advertised a certification for computers "we build" on behalf of a service flagged available: false, and its inbound CTA copy had sat unmaintained long enough to contain a German grammar error ("Hol sich deine" for "Hol dir deine").

Page, messages, sitemap entry, and the inbound certification block are all gone. If evig wants a quality label later, it belongs on the QC Prüfsiegel the intake pipeline already produces — not on a name evig no longer carries.

Also removed ROUTES.public.transparenzKennzahlen: a route constant used by nothing, pointing at a page that deliberately calls notFound().

One baseline moved, deliberately

Two new "wrong language" findings, both false positives of the same kind as the last batch: "Trovare un tecnico" (correct Italian) and "Encontrar a quien lo repare" (correct Spanish), each scored own 0 because the words are absent from the detector's word list for that language. Verified by reading before accepting.

Verification

npm run verify green on this exact tree: lint, umlauts, chrome, docs, compliance, typecheck, 7746 tests, production build.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code