Skip to content

Rename CTxinWitness -> CTxInWitness#8311

Merged
laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
AtakamaLLC:CTxInWitness
Jul 14, 2016
Merged

Rename CTxinWitness -> CTxInWitness#8311
laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
AtakamaLLC:CTxInWitness

Conversation

@mcelrath
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mcelrath mcelrath commented Jul 7, 2016

...in order to match the convention used elsewhere CTxIn (notice the capital 'I').

I'm mirroring these changes into python-bitcoinlib, which keeps all the same class names as Bitcoin Core. This incongruity in naming stuck out to me.

@petertodd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

petertodd commented Jul 7, 2016

Concept ACK

I don't really care what color the bikesheds are painted, but can we please just use the same colour again? :)

@dcousens
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dcousens commented Jul 8, 2016

utACK 36ae37a

@mcelrath
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

mcelrath commented Jul 8, 2016

Tested ACK

Been running this since shortly before I made the PR.

@paveljanik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

utACK 36ae37a

@laanwj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

laanwj commented Jul 11, 2016

Indeed, the precedent seems to be CTxIn.

@sipa do you agree with this naming change?

If we do this it should be merged before 0.13 to avoid having different spellings in different releases.

@laanwj laanwj added this to the 0.13.0 milestone Jul 11, 2016
@petertodd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@laanwj ack 0.13.0 milestone - I'd like to have naming consistent in python-bitcoinlib too.

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 36ae37a into bitcoin:master Jul 14, 2016
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2016
36ae37a Rename CTxinWitness -> CTxInWitness (Bob McElrath)
@laanwj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

laanwj commented Jul 14, 2016

trivial-ACK 36ae37a

@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants