fix handling 401 in actuator requests: distinguish between SBA security and target app actuator security. #2019
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: This PR based on #2018 , please review and merge #2018 first.
Example:
We want allow any user to access /applications.html but do not want to allow get heap dumps or inspect configuration properties.
Than we configure:
That when user open applications.html and then drill down to instance it will get 401.
This 401 should be handled and user should be redirected to login page.
But if user will get 401 from proxied request (target app security does not allow access endpoint) then no redirect should be performed.
To distinguish between SBA security and target app security I introduced new header. If it exists then user request bypassed SBA security and 401 was received from target app.