docs: register ai-config as a check-new-line-breaks consumer - #302
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Code reviewReviewed this one-line Fact-checked the citations in the added text:
One finding posted inline: the entry lists No other issues found — the added prose is otherwise accurate, well-cited, and consistent with the table's existing style (no AI-tell language, no broken links, no CLAUDE.md formatting violations). VerdictNeeds more work — hold until ai-config#703 merges (or move |
|
Claude finished review — View run Review posted. Summary: PR #302 ( Finding (posted inline on REVDEPS.md:31): The registration is premature. I fact-checked the cited references: VerdictNeeds more work |
ai-config#703 (the migration PR) hasn't merged yet, so ai-config isn't actually calling check-new-line-breaks from main. Follow the qwt row's precedent: list it as pending in Notes, not in Workflows used, until the migration PR merges.
|
Claude finished review — View run Code reviewThis is a follow-up review round on PR #302. The diff has changed since my last review (comment posted 2026-07-25T01:30:54Z, #302). Prior finding resolved. My previous inline comment on Re-verified the citations in the new text:
No new issues found. The updated row is well-formed Markdown (no broken table syntax), free of AI-tell language, and consistent with the table's existing style. VerdictReady for merge — the prior finding (premature registration) is fully addressed; no new issues introduced. |
d-morrison/ai-config#702/#703 migrates from its own localscripts/check-new-line-breaks.pyto this repo's newcheck-new-line-breaksreusable workflow (gha#300).
REVDEPS.mdsays "If your repo calls a ghaworkflow, please open a PR adding it below" — registering it here.
No code change;
REVDEPS.mdonly.Generated by Claude Code