feat: build, chain-validate, and seed evo snapshot state - #7593
Draft
PastaPastaPasta wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
feat: build, chain-validate, and seed evo snapshot state#7593PastaPastaPasta wants to merge 4 commits into
PastaPastaPasta wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
5 tasks
…e validation First code PR of the assumeutxo M4 series (dashpay#7579 decomposition): the versioned interchange format for Dash's evo state alongside a UTXO snapshot - canonical serialization, DoS-bounded validating decode, and every validation invariant that needs no chain context. Chain-aware building/validation and dump/load integration follow in the next PRs of the series. Canonical ordering exists because snapshot content is hashed and cross-checked; per-object serializers are reused through a bounded stream wrapper, with bespoke code only at container level (ordering, bounds, per-entry budgets); decode-time checks deliberately stay out of the trusted hot EvoDB deserializers. AssumeutxoData gains the EvoSnapshotHash anchor the format is pinned by. Includes the aggregate rotation skip-list bound (lists accumulate across every quorum index and wrap the combined MN list), the CRangesSet bounded unserializer, and a vendored-immer shift-base ubsan suppression reachable only through the deliberately hash-colliding test fixtures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… sign change The mask for rejecting out-of-range trailing bits promotes through operator~ to a negative int before its implicit conversion back to uint8_t, which clang's implicit-integer-sign-change check reports for every bitset whose size is not a multiple of eight. The evo snapshot unit tests are the first to deserialize such bitsets under the sanitizer job. Same bits, stated explicitly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Second code PR of the assumeutxo M4 series: BuildEvoSnapshot() collects commitments, rotation snapshots, historical MN-list diffs, and modifiers from chain state; ValidateEvoSnapshotAgainstChain() verifies a decoded snapshot against the block index, deployments, and quorum reconstruction; and the EvoDB seeding surface (canonical MN lists, mined commitments, credit pool, MNHF signals, quorum snapshots and modifiers) writes exactly the state reconstruction later reads. GetHashModifier() prefers a seeded exact modifier when the work block's data is unavailable and cross-checks it against recomputation when it is; a mismatch throws SnapshotStateMismatchError, unreachable in production until the load-time integration seeds modifiers, at which point the next PR routes it into the controlled invalid-snapshot path. GetDeterministicMNListHash() switches to the canonical codec hash so completion markers and payload-derived hashes share an identity; nothing on develop compares the old and new encodings across an upgrade except a dev-channel node mid-snapshot-validation, which would fail completion conservatively. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…izon BuildEvoSnapshot() required every enabled LLMQ type to have exactly signingActiveQuorumCount active commitments plus the complete safety and rotation horizons, and both validation layers enforced the same equalities. A young chain, a freshly activated quorum type, or a rotation type whose first cycles predate its activation cannot satisfy that, so dumptxoutset would fail on perfectly valid chain state. Reported by review on the predecessor PR. The builder now emits the history that exists (clamped to the parameter-derived maxima), context-free validation treats the parameter counts as upper bounds, and chain-aware validation requires every carried entry to sit at a derived horizon position while tolerating absent ones. Withholding available history is not made easier by this: the completion-time CbTx quorum merkle root pins the active set exactly, historical-diff and modifier tallies must still mirror the carried commitments, and quorum reconstruction against chain state establishes sufficiency at completion. Two regression tests pin the young-chain builder path and the partial-history validation path; both fail against the previous exact-count enforcement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
PastaPastaPasta
force-pushed
the
feat/evo-snapshot-chain
branch
from
August 13, 2026 05:13
67f4773 to
0a41edc
Compare
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Stacked on #7592 — the first two commits shown here belong to that PR; this one adds the last three. It will be rebased once #7592 merges.
Part of the AssumeUTXO M4 decomposition (#7579 — see the series map there); stacked on the format-core PR and reviewable as one question: given the v3 format, how does snapshot content get produced from chain state, verified against it, and seeded back into EvoDB? The
dumptxoutset/load lifecycle wiring is deliberately absent — it is the next and final PR of the series.What was done?
Three layers, one commit each:
evo/snapshot.cpp):BuildEvoSnapshot()collects active/safety commitments, rotation snapshots, historical MN-list diffs, and exact score modifiers from chain state;ValidateEvoSnapshotAgainstChain()verifies a decoded snapshot against the block index, deployments, work-block ancestry, rotation horizons, and per-entry seeded modifiers.deterministicmns,llmq/blockprocessor,llmq/snapshot,creditpool,mnhftx,evodb):Seed*writers that store exactly the state reconstruction later reads, without publishing into the shared NORMAL-chainstate caches.GetHashModifier()prefers a seeded exact modifier when the work block's data is unavailable and cross-checks it against recomputation when it is; a mismatch throwsSnapshotStateMismatchError, which is unreachable in production until the load integration seeds modifiers (the next PR routes it into the controlled invalid-snapshot path — the plumbing is deliberately not wired here).GetDeterministicMNListHash()switches to the canonical codec hash so completion markers and payload-derived hashes share one identity.BuildEvoSnapshot()originally required every enabled LLMQ type to carry exactlysigningActiveQuorumCountactives plus full safety and rotation horizons, which a young chain, a freshly activated type, or a rotation type with pre-activation horizon cycles cannot satisfy —dumptxoutsetwould fail on valid chain state (flagged as blocking by review on backport: assumeutxo M4 — evo snapshot format v3 and LLMQ reconstruction #7579). The builder now emits the history that exists, context-free validation treats parameter counts as maxima, and chain validation requires every carried entry to sit at a derived horizon position while tolerating absent ones. This does not make withholding easier: the completion-time CbTx quorum merkle root pins the active set exactly, historical-diff and modifier tallies must mirror the carried commitments, and completion-time quorum reconstruction establishes sufficiency. Two regression tests (young-chain builder, partial-history validation) fail against the previous exact-count enforcement.One accepted dev-channel caveat: the
GetDeterministicMNListHash()encoding switch means a develop node that activated a snapshot before this change and completes validation after it would fail completion conservatively (marker hash mismatch) and re-sync from the base. No released version carries the old markers.How Has This Been Tested?
Full unit suite green on a
--enable-werrorbuild; the chain-aware test block exercises reconstruction from seeded state only, pre/post-DIP3 validation matrices, rotation bitset/work-list binding, and the two new partial-history regressions. Snapshot suites also run under a--with-sanitizers=undefined,integerbuild.Breaking Changes
None on any release branch (see the dev-channel caveat above).
Checklist: